Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 4:27 AM   
 By:   Originalthinkr@aol.com   (Member)

At tonight's record-signing/Q&A session at Borders Books in Westwood, California, Elmer Bernstein went on the record and said that it was Weinstein who stripped GANGS OF NEW YORK of the score EB had written, over the vigorous objections of Martin Scorsese.

Obviously, the studio paid for the work, and they do have final say over what goes out with their name on it, but it was, without doubt, an appalling creative decision on Miramax's part, stripping Scorsese's thirty-year vision of the dramatic and emotional glue needed to hold it together.

Bernstein's been in the business long enough to be philosophical and cheerful about it (at least publicly), but he really does want the music to be heard and appreciated by his public, and will try to secure permission to bring it to disc in the not-too-distant future, that notorious music critic, Harvey Weinstein, permitting.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 4:59 AM   
 By:   JohnSWalsh   (Member)

It would have taken a lot more than Bernstein's score to save GANGS. It kept my interest for 3 hours, but DeCaprio's and Diaz's characters were not just thin, they were non-existant. They were types, not characters.

(Was anyone surprised at all when DiCaprio stopped the assasination attempt? He CARES for the man he got close to in order to kill--how ironic! And the left-for-dead-nursed-back-to-avenge thing is older than old.)

A big, beautiful and interesting movie when it focused (though barely) on the draft riots (though it soft-pedalled the race angle), the settings, Day-Lewis, and the political machinations. I thought I was about to see greatness when the movie opened with that great pull-back of the immigrant's prison-like chambers, and then the opening fight (some hate it, I thought it was terrific).

Bernstein could have helped it, but this was one of those projects that became such an obsession that, IMO, it was just worked to death over 2 decades. It had no blood. It didn't breathe. Pity.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 5:28 AM   
 By:   Ford A. Thaxton   (Member)

At tonight's record-signing/Q&A session at Borders Books in Westwood, California, Elmer Bernstein went on the record and said that it was Weinstein who stripped GANGS OF NEW YORK of the score EB had written, over the vigorous objections of Martin Scorsese.

Old news, I posted this information WEEKS ago.

:-)

I'm hoping that Elmer gets his CD at some point in the near future.


Ford A. Thaxton

 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 7:11 AM   
 By:   Sigerson Holmes   (Member)

I wonder what Elmer, or Howard Shore for that matter, thinks of Bono's GOLDEN-GLOBE-WINNING song Miramax tacked on at the end?

I also wonder who finally decided NOT to use the original song Janet Jackson wrote for the end credits of "Chicago." That could have been another Golden Globe winner right there.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 9:31 AM   
 By:   manderley   (Member)

"......it was Weinstein who stripped GANGS OF NEW YORK of the score EB had written, over the vigorous objections of Martin Scorsese....."

Especially curious, then, that Scorsese made a point of thanking all the various music contributors to the film (but excluding Bernstein) in his Golden Globes acceptance speech...

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 12:16 PM   
 By:   Ed Kattak   (Member)

"......it was Weinstein who stripped GANGS OF NEW YORK of the score EB had written, over the vigorous objections of Martin Scorsese....."

Especially curious, then, that Scorsese made a point of thanking all the various music contributors to the film (but excluding Bernstein) in his Golden Globes acceptance speech...


Yes, but how can you thank someone who's music wasn't even used in the final theatrical picture. I think Scorcese probably wanted to avoid creating any more controversy than there already was.

It is a shame though. I'd love to hear Elmer's score.

Truly Gau Jus
Ed

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 12:24 PM   
 By:   Greg Bryant   (Member)

Weinstein(s) seem to be a general meance to movie music, not to mention movies in general.

First, they / he pulls Bernstein's music from Gangs of New York;

Then he tries to pick a fight with Elliot Goldenthal of Frida.

It's too bad that he just won't go away. He has too much power in Hollywood.

I don't see as many Miramax films as I used to because they just aren't as good as they used to be...

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 12:25 PM   
 By:   Greg Bryant   (Member)



Old news, I posted this information WEEKS ago.


So?

Have you and Harvey Weinstein ever been seen together? How do we know if the two of you are not actually the same person?

 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 2:17 PM   
 By:   swoony   (Member)

Go to New York magazine's website and type in Harvey's name and Scott Rudin's name. Their fight over "The Hours" is becoming legendary, including their fight over Philip Glass's score.

 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 2:26 PM   
 By:   SchiffyM   (Member)

Especially curious, then, that Scorsese made a point of thanking all the various music contributors to the film (but excluding Bernstein) in his Golden Globes acceptance speech...


I'm sure Scorcese IS grateful to those various music contributors. As for his not going on the record, for now, about Bernstein's rejection, it would simply not be in his best interest. Why would he let on that his film is, in any way, less than what he wanted it to be? Why would he tell the public that it is damaged goods? He wants people to see it, after all.

- Mike

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 2:26 PM   
 By:   Greg Bryant   (Member)

Go to New York magazine's website and type in Harvey's name and Scott Rudin's name. Their fight over "The Hours" is becoming legendary, including their fight over Philip Glass's score.

Both Rudin and Weinstein have reps in Hollywood as very powerful AND very difficult.

Does it matter that they made a great film (The Hours)? I suppose it does, and I will more likely pay attention to the film than I will the clash of the titans.

It's just a shame though what happened to grandmaster Elmer Bernstein. He's the one who deserved a helluva lot more repsect than he got, and ended up being treated that badly. Certainly Weinstein would not have gotten away with this with John Williams and (to a lesser extent) Jerry Goldsmith.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 2:55 PM   
 By:   Howard L   (Member)

One can only dream what Herrmann would have told Harvey if Mr. W pulled that act on him. I am not familiar with the Goldenthal score, and it may very well be of award-winning merit, but a small part of me wonders if we may be witnessing another Andrews/Hepburn consolation prize, albeit in a very oblique manner.

 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 3:11 PM   
 By:   JJH   (Member)

people that go down in history for being great usually are not known for being moderates.

Weinstein may be a musical dumbass and asshole, but he lives or dies by whatever the final product is, and it dosen't seem GONY has done all that well.



 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 6:25 PM   
 By:   Justin Doring   (Member)

I knew it, I knew it, I knew it! That Weinstein guy is a real prince. I really hope Bernstein gets the Oscar, and while I'm sorry he didn't get the Golden Globe, I was glad to see Goldenthal get it, because it's a nice slap in the face to Weinstein after his behavior regarding Frida. Of course U2 winning the Golden Globe for best song and Scorsese thanking them and all the other music contributors was kind of a slap in the face to Bernstein, but he may have his revenge with the Oscars, and Scorsese probably didn't want any more controversy.

Bernstein's score could not have saved Gangs of New York, but it would have helped considerably, and it deserves to be heard ala "Music Inspired by the Film Last Man Standing."

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 7:48 PM   
 By:   Originalthinkr@aol.com   (Member)

Howard, if you're familiar with Miklos Rozsa's memoir, "A Double Life," then you'd know it's too bad that the composer George Antheil didn't write the score to GANGS OF NEW YORK. In response to Harvey Weinstein's brutal dictatorial interference, Antheil, the self-styled "Bad Boy of Music" (the title of his autobiography) would surely have pulled out a pistol and blown Weinstein's head off.

 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 8:10 PM   
 By:   Essankay   (Member)

Bernstein's score could not have saved Gangs of New York, but it would have helped considerably, and it deserves to be heard....


Orig is quite right when he states "Bernstein... does want the music to be heard and appreciated by his public, and will try to secure permission to bring it to disc in the not-too-distant future..." I was there too and Bernstein was very clear about this.

So once the brouhaha has abated and GONY is out of the theaters, we may be lucky enough to actually hear what Bernstein created for the film. But as for "Harvey Weinstein permitting", unless Elmer is a really sly old fox and has a clause in his contract that will allow him to release the music without Weinstein's permission, that could prove to be a real obstacle. On the other hand, if Elmer wins an Academy Award this year, maybe Weinstein will figure he can exploit that fact and make a little moolah off the unused score.

Hmmm, tough call. Regardless of Bernstein's intentions, I'm going to keep my fingers crossed on this one.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 21, 2003 - 10:56 PM   
 By:   Howard L   (Member)

...but he lives or dies by whatever the final product is...

Well goody-goody for him. This faux admirable quality is often the bane of they who have the power (read: money) but lack the authority (read: artistic integrity). In other words, it's always nice to play The Brave Soul when the only thing in your 'favor' is you can afford to!

Antheil, the self-styled "Bad Boy of Music" (the title of his autobiography) would surely have pulled out a pistol and blown Weinstein's head off.

Now THAT is what I call authority.smile

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 22, 2003 - 1:46 AM   
 By:   Joe E.   (Member)

Obviously the video release will reflect the final theatrical release, but DVD being what it is, it surely would be possible to include alternate audio tracks with Bernstein's score, letting the viewer choose which version of the film to watch/listen to. Is there anything we can do to persuade the studio to give us this option on the DVD?

 
 Posted:   Jan 22, 2003 - 2:39 AM   
 By:   JJH   (Member)

I would also like to point out that Miramax all but disowned that horror film called Below, which actually had a lot going for it.
Certainly it was better than many other recent horror films.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 22, 2003 - 2:44 AM   
 By:   Ford A. Thaxton   (Member)

Obviously the video release will reflect the final theatrical release, but DVD being what it is, it surely would be possible to include alternate audio tracks with Bernstein's score, letting the viewer choose which version of the film to watch/listen to. Is there anything we can do to persuade the studio to give us this option on the DVD?

Your kidding right???

There isn't a chance in hell that will happen at his point in time.


Ford A. Thaxtoin

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.