Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2015 - 4:39 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

Never got into the whole hype about the ending of the first being so stunning, unexpected or iconic.

You had to be there in early 1968. It left you dumbstruck. Ask the makers of "Mad Men."


No it wouldn't. That unjustified claim...


How old are you? I'm 56 and was almost nine when I saw PLANET in early April 1968. The ending left me stunned. It's not one of the most famous film endings ever for nothing.

Now, BENEATH.... even as an eleven-year-old it bored me, and Oh! How it bores me still. One of the best examples ever of how you DON'T do a sequel. BENEATH is a mess.

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2015 - 6:48 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Never got into the whole hype about the ending of the first being so stunning, unexpected or iconic.

You had to be there in early 1968. It left you dumbstruck. Ask the makers of "Mad Men."


No it wouldn't. That unjustified claim...


How old are you? I'm 56 and was almost nine when I saw PLANET in early April 1968. The ending left me stunned. It's not one of the most famous film endings ever for nothing.

Now, BENEATH.... even as an eleven-year-old it bored me, and Oh! How it bores me still. One of the best examples ever of how you DON'T do a sequel. BENEATH is a mess.


Yeah I'll never forget how crushed I was with the sequel. It's my least favorite. The sequel felt like an unnecessary low budget cash grab. Well all the sequels were, but it's still the most unwatchable of the batch!

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2015 - 6:51 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)


And another thing: A metal statue that survives being partially IN the salty sea for more than 2000 years! Anyone who knows a little of chemistry and specifically redox-reactions know that thát ís some serious defiance of science.


I get it, You don't like the first film. But come on, your stretching it with arguments like that!

 
 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2015 - 7:17 PM   
 By:   Zooba   (Member)

How do we not know that maybe in the future of the world of the movie, someone invented a treatment that was lathered over The Statue of Liberty thus preventing it from decay that it would have normally suffered? We only know what is told to us or shown on screen. Other things could have happened. Oh and, it's a silly movie about Monkeys taking over the world! Please pass the popcorn.

I love all of the films in the series for what they individually are. Like the STAR TREK Features, some our stupendous, while others are laughable, but I think all contain likable elements throughout. These are fun popcorn movies. Please pass the Pepsi and the Goobers.

And there could have been a scene that happens between BENEATH and ESCAPE showing Dr. Milo taking a team of Ape O Divers to the Great Lake where Taylor's ship sank. The Ape O Divers precede to deep dive, having with them, Floatation devices (inflated once secured under Taylor's ship) that bring up the Spacecraft ala the 747 in AIRPORT '77! Now there you go.

There has to be deleted scenes or at least lost stills of the Ape O Divers somewhere!

 
 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2015 - 8:13 PM   
 By:   Jim Cleveland   (Member)

How do we not know that maybe in the future of the world of the movie, someone invented a treatment that was lathered over The Statue of Liberty thus preventing it from decay that it would have normally suffered? We only know what is told to us or shown on screen. Other things could have happened. Oh and, it's a silly movie about Monkeys taking over the world! Please pass the popcorn.

I love all of the films in the series for what they individually are. Like the STAR TREK Features, some our stupendous, while others are laughable, but I think all contain likable elements throughout. These are fun popcorn movies. Please pass the Pepsi and the Goobers.

And there could have been a scene that happens between BENEATH and ESCAPE showing Dr. Milo taking a team of Ape O Divers to the Great Lake where Taylor's ship sank. The Ape O Divers precede to deep dive, having with them, Floatation devices (inflated once secured under Taylor's ship) that bring up the Spacecraft ala the 747 in AIRPORT '77! Now there you go.

There has to be deleted scenes or at least lost stills of the Ape O Divers somewhere!


Okay... don't know why I'm going to put this out there.... but The Statue of Liberty might not have been that close to the shore 2,000 years before. There is this thing called EROSION, and the statue might have only been that close to the water for a relatively short time when Taylor came across it.

 
 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2015 - 11:52 PM   
 By:   chromaparadise   (Member)

Okay, just to clear up a couple of details about BENEATH from the APJAC files:

Scenes that were shot, in the first cut workprint and then subsequently deleted:
  • Some of Ursus' speech was cut, implying the ape population at large knew the history of the Forbidden Zone when they didn't.
  • The middle of the steam bath scene was cut because of the same thing.
  • Half of the scene between Zira, Cornelius and Dr. Zaius (with Brent eavesdropping) was cut. In this dialogue we learn there was a half-baked plea-bargain whereby Zaius admitted man came before the apes and Cornelius and Zira promised to keep it secret and thus stay out of jail. It was cut because it appeared that Zaius had no leverage over the chimps—which is bassackwards!
  • A scene with Brent and Nova being taken out of the wagon after the target practice sequence was cut, since Cornelius spoke to Brent in too close a proximity to some gorillas to be plausible.
  • The Ring-Around-The-Neutrons scene with the Mutant children was (as Rory pointed out) put into the "thought projection" images in the Interrogation Room.
  • Some of the Mutant interrogation of Brent was cut because it was deemed too repetitive.
  • The gorilla soldier that appears in the hole in the cell wall had originally stuck his rifle through and shot up the cell, though he saw nobody. Jacobs asked the question, “Why don't Taylor or Brent or both just grab the rifle barrel and rip it out of his hands?” And so, it was removed; however, after the close-up of the gorilla soldier to the wide shot as he walks away, the cell is full of smoke and dust.
  • The whole second half of the film was re-cut to move the ape army's invasion up. It was felt by Editor Marion Rothman and Director Ted Post that there wasn't a sense of urgency for the protagonists to escape, and thus less tension in the audience.

    Written and tested:
  • The half-human, half-ape child was NOT a progeny of the mutants. He was a child of the evolved apes and the sub-humans (like Nova) much farther into the future than the 3978 (or 3955) timeframe. There were a few test shots filmed in front of the St. Patrick's Cathedral Exterior set and the boy was costumed in a Mutant child's garb for convenience sake. Idea dumped because of issues with studio and MPAA feeling it implied bestiality. This concept was written by Ben Maddow, who was brought on to do uncredited revisions to the script in April 1969 prior to shooting due to general unhappiness with the final Dehn draft (who's contract and expensive extension had run out).
  • A concept for some Mutated gorillas that survived the underground war.

    Written and never filmed:
  • The whole film was conceived by Paul Dehn in a “frame” to be told by a narrator. At the end, the gorilla army, Ursus, Zaius and the Mutants would all be killed in an underground detonation of the nuclear bomb (not a doomsday device) and Taylor, Brent, Nova, Cornelius, Zira and all the peace loving citizens of the planet of the apes would try to learn from everyone's mistakes. The narrator turns out to be a teacher telling the story of Taylor, Brent and the Mutant war to school children.
  • As actor, budget and studio demands changed, the whole ending was re-written at least six times. The revised ending conceived by Maddow had the half-human/half-ape child as one of the school children in a decidedly far flung future from PLANET and BENEATH's 3978 (or 3955) where they have very high-tech 3D projection screens in their classroom.
  • When Heston demanded to be killed off (or not appear in the film after reading Dehn's more upbeat ending which Taylor survives just a few weeks prior to the start of shooting), the ending quickly devolved into the Alpha-Omega bomb storyline. All of these revision drafts were written by Ben Maddow. It was not ordered by Richard Zanuck because he was getting fired. That story is bogus. Zanuck didn't leave Fox until the end of 1970. He approved ESCAPE and was there during much of its production. He wasn't fired, his contract expired on December 31st and was not picked up. The same happened to Jerry Goldsmith shortly after that as well. So did Arthur Jacobs' deal after ESCAPE. It was all done to save money from the hemorrhaging Fox studio at the time—a studio Arthur Jacobs thought wouldn't be around to produce another APES sequel after ESCAPE.

    big grin!!

  •  
     
     Posted:   Sep 25, 2015 - 2:03 AM   
     By:   Mike_J   (Member)

    Okay, just to clear up a couple of details about BENEATH from the APJAC files:

    Thanks for all this. I'm a huge Apes fan and thought I knew pretty much everything but this included a few new things for me. Where did you get your info? It wasn't in the brilliant Planet of the Apes Revisited is it? I've not read that in years but I'm pretty sure some of those facts you've cited aren't mentioned in that excellent book.

     
     
     Posted:   Sep 25, 2015 - 2:25 AM   
     By:   chromaparadise   (Member)

    Okay, just to clear up a couple of details about BENEATH from the APJAC files:

    Thanks for all this. I'm a huge Apes fan and thought I knew pretty much everything but this included a few new things for me. Where did you get your info? It wasn't in the brilliant Planet of the Apes Revisited is it? I've not read that in years but I'm pretty sure some of those facts you've cited aren't mentioned in that excellent book.


    It's from the extensive research I did for my new book "Simians & Serialism" about Jerry Goldsmith's PLANET OF THE APES score. A good chunk of the book covers the production history of all 5 films because they really had a hand in who got hired and what they composed. Sadly the first print run on my book is Sold Out.

    When I started my research, I found that many of the books on the APES film relied too heavily on interviews done decades after the fact, and those interviews conflicted and contradicted a mile-long paper trail of memos in Arthur Jacobs' files. I also noticed the production timelines tend to get jumbled up and confuse the order in which things happened during development and production, which can lead readers to wrong conclusions. So I mapped out a huge timeline, identified gaps and sought out sources and collections that had never been tapped to fill those gaps.

    For people still interested in buying the book, I'm building a list of interested buyers. If there's enough demand, then there's a real possibility of a 2nd print run. If you want to add your voice to the list, drop me a line at orders @ PithikosEntertainment.com smile!

     
     Posted:   Sep 25, 2015 - 9:55 AM   
     By:   RoryR   (Member)

    What's detailed above goes to show why BENEATH is a failure -- it never had a good script. It's a hodgepodge of things that just didn't come together into a cohesive screenplay. The first half is a retread of the first movie, minus any deep ideas or great Michael Wilson dialogue, and the second half is ill-conceived and then half-baked. But the script's greatest failure is that it lacks completely any character development. You just don't get a good movie when all the characters are just ciphers. There was a proper way to go with a sequel to PLANET, but Heston threw a monkey wrench into the works when he told Fox he had no interest in doing a sequel. That proper, logical sequel should have been a further development of the Taylor character, away from a misanthrope towards a more caring humanitarian and a could be savior of his species and an exploration of whether or not that was even possible. Instead, we got BENEATH THE PLANET OF THE APES, the King Kong of nihilistic movies. Pointless.

     
     
     Posted:   Sep 25, 2015 - 11:36 AM   
     By:   Mike_J   (Member)

    Okay, just to clear up a couple of details about BENEATH from the APJAC files:

    Thanks for all this. I'm a huge Apes fan and thought I knew pretty much everything but this included a few new things for me. Where did you get your info? It wasn't in the brilliant Planet of the Apes Revisited is it? I've not read that in years but I'm pretty sure some of those facts you've cited aren't mentioned in that excellent book.


    It's from the extensive research I did for my new book "Simians & Serialism" about Jerry Goldsmith's PLANET OF THE APES score. A good chunk of the book covers the production history of all 5 films because they really had a hand in who got hired and what they composed. Sadly the first print run on my book is Sold Out.

    When I started my research, I found that many of the books on the APES film relied too heavily on interviews done decades after the fact, and those interviews conflicted and contradicted a mile-long paper trail of memos in Arthur Jacobs' files. I also noticed the production timelines tend to get jumbled up and confuse the order in which things happened during development and production, which can lead readers to wrong conclusions. So I mapped out a huge timeline, identified gaps and sought out sources and collections that had never been tapped to fill those gaps.

    For people still interested in buying the book, I'm building a list of interested buyers. If there's enough demand, then there's a real possibility of a 2nd print run. If you want to add your voice to the list, drop me a line at orders @ PithikosEntertainment.com smile!


    Any chance of a Kindle edition?

     
     
     Posted:   Sep 25, 2015 - 2:08 PM   
     By:   tarasis   (Member)

    I'd love a kindle or epub version, or better yet release it on Smashwords so its DRM free and I can choose either format (or both)

     
     
     Posted:   Sep 25, 2015 - 3:34 PM   
     By:   chromaparadise   (Member)

    I'd love a kindle or epub version, or better yet release it on Smashwords so its DRM free and I can choose either format (or both)


    I've explained on several other threads why there's no e-pub version of “Simians & Serialism.” The question does come up here and there so here's the detailed reasons (nothing's as simple or easy as it might seem!):

    1, I would have had to pay double everything to release print and e-pub versions (i.e. music print licenses, quotation licenses, ISBNs, copyrights, Library of Congress control numbers, massive differences in the preparation of the book layout, etc.), that would have necessitated a huge cash layout. 2, These expenses would have forced me to price the e-pub version of the book virtually the same as the print version, save the shipping cost—and many would have found that a turn-off.
    2, Some of the publishers I licensed material from were very hesitant about e-pub versions, particularly anything that might be DRM-free.
    3, In the “Film Score World,” people have demonstrated a desire for physical media, so I made the choice to go with a physical print book.
    4, Before the book was released, I counted up potential customers that e-mailed me and discussed it online. There was a greater than 40:1 physical vs. e-pub, so it kind of made the decision for me.

    Looking back at the first print run, at a 40:1 ratio, I'm glad I did what I did: the e-pub version would still have been way in the red at this point.

     
    You must log in or register to post.
      Go to page:    
    © 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
    Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.