 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None of this stuff ever happened anyway. Vulcan blew up a long time ago. J.J. says so.
Screw "Live long and prosper."
It's "May the Force be with you" now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, my bad.
What I meant to say was, "Vulcans have this long-forgotten 'inner eyelid' that prevents Romulan loonies from blowing up their home world. No worries, mates."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Aug 26, 2015 - 7:45 AM
|
|
|
|
By: |
Lee S
(Member)
|
Also, perhaps Sarek and Amanda had some inkling that they had betrothed their only child to an adorable 7-year-old girl who turned into a sociopath and they decided they didn't need to see all that happen.
Well, Vulcans strive to attain some sociopathic traits, but her actions werent motivated from cruelty. She wanted Stan - Stun, whatever. The Challenge duel was the only way out of the arranged marriage, and choosing Kirk saved Stan from harm. True, involving Kirk was a tad heartless, but he was merely collateral damage, as real life sociopaths would say.
They weren't motivated by cruelty, but her actions surely show a depraved indifference to life. She acknowledges that she is willing to cheat on Spock if they were to marry ("...it would be the same. You would be gone; I would have your name and your property, and Stonn would still be there."), but she still takes action that ensures the death of either Kirk or Spock. It's also clear that Spock has the power to call off the relationship at a certain point ("You would free me..."), but rather than telling him that she wants to be with Stonn and doesn't want Spock's money, she devises this Byzantine scheme with a body count.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old Spock just needed to use the Guardian Of Forever to go back and prevent Nero from ever being born. Vulcan restored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
