Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Mar 18, 2023 - 11:25 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

OPERATION FORTUNE: RUSE DE GUERRE (2023) – 7/10

This film is a cross between James Bond and Mission: Impossible. Cary Elwes is “Nathan,” the head of a freelance group of operators who usually hire out their services to the British government. “Orson Fortune” (Jason Statham), their main operator, has a taste for expensive wines and lavish private jets. The British are alarmed by a theft from a top-secret private computer lab. But since all the lab personnel were killed, they don’t know what was stolen, only that it is for sale on the black market to the highest bidder. It’s Fortune’s job to find out what was taken, who is selling it, and who the buyer is.

Much to Fortune’s displeasure, he has been assigned two new helpers, because his prior main assistant has been poached by a rival group. Along with Fortune on this mission is computer expert “Sarah” (Aubrey Plaza) and weapons expert “JJ” (Bugzy Malone). Fortune takes care of all the hand-to-hand combat. The team needs to get close to “Greg” (Hugh Grant), a suave multi-billionaire who acts as the facilitator for the illicit transaction, bringing buyer and seller together for a cool $10 billion finder’s fee. In order to get an invitation to one of Greg’s parties, the team dragoons Hollywood action star “Danny” (Josh Hartnett) into the plan, since Greg is a big fan of Danny’s.

Hugh Grant, in his third film for director Guy Ritchie, gives a performance that is worth the price of admission here—just the right combination of polish, imperiousness, and menace. Statham is the same as he is in every film—terse, a tad too serious, and quick with a punch. Aubrey Plaza, who had a much meatier role as the star of last year’s EMILY THE CRIMINAL, is mainly eye candy here, notwithstanding her character’s prodigious and (as is standard for these types of roles) hard-to-believe tech abilities.

This film is a lot more straight-forward and less convoluted plot-wise than Guy Ritchie’s British crime films. The characters are less quirky as well. That adds up to a more routine experience than one expects from a Ritchie film. In OPERATION FORTUNE, Ritchie feels boxed in, as he was by the conventions necessary for his 2015 THE MAN FROM U.N.C.L.E. Only in this case, it’s a strait jacket of Ritchie’s own making.

Christopher Benstead provides a standard action score for the film. The production cost $50 million, more than double what the superior THE GENTLEMEN (2019) cost. So far, OPERATION FORTUNE has only grossed $37 million worldwide, compared to $115 million for THE GENTLEMEN. At least the money is up there on the screen, with plenty of lavish homes, yachts, and planes in view.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 21, 2023 - 2:59 PM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)

Knock on any Door(1949)7/10
With Humphrey Bogart, John Derek and George McCready

Derek is arrested for murdering a coppa. Humph is defending him. McCready is the prosecutor. Cue some flashbacks to explain how Derek arrived where he was. Also plenty of courtroom sparring, obviously.
Recorded off the telly and billed as 'little seen'. I certainly wasn't familiar with it. It was a change seeing Bogey playing an honest guy. I think he pulled it off, especially in his final court summation. McCready was also good. And while not playing the villain he still managed to be slimey.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 23, 2023 - 12:14 AM   
 By:   Moonlit   (Member)

Some I'd been meaning to revisit....

Florida Project (2017)- was one of my favorites at the time. It feels almost effortless. About a young irresponsible mother who lives in a hotel by the highway.

It Came At Night (2014)- about the black plague.

It Follows (2015)- about STDemons and possibly sexual assault as one put it. Running and staying ahead of death. Rather unique idea.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 23, 2023 - 1:09 AM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT (2022) – 8/10

This is the third filming of Erich Maria Remarque’s 1928 novel. The 1930 U.S. film won the Oscar for “Outstanding Production” (precursor to “Best Picture”), and the 1979 British-American television adaptation won the Golden Globe Award for “Best Motion Picture Made for Television.” This current film of the experience of a German soldier during the First World War is the first film adaptation by Germany. It recently won the Oscar for “Best International Feature” as well as the BAFTA Award for “Best Film.”

Set in 1917, three years into World War I, the film follows 17-year-old “Paul Bäumer” (Felix Kammerer) as he enlists in the Imperial German Army alongside friends “Albert Kropp” (Aaron Hilmer), “Franz Müller” (Moritz Klaus), and “Ludwig Behm” (Adrian Grünewald). They listen to a patriotic speech by a school official and unknowingly receive uniforms from soldiers killed in a previous battle (a gruesome opening to the film). After they are deployed in Northern France near La Malmaison, they are befriended by “Stanislaus ‘Kat’ Katczinsky” (Albrecht Schuch), an older soldier. Their romantic view of the war is quickly shattered by the realities of trench warfare on the Western Front, where thousands of men perish fighting over hundreds of yards of territory.

Everyone knows that the novel and its films are no flag-wavers and are decidedly anti-war films, illustrating the futility, hypocrisy, and horror of the war. This film is a triumph of production design, deservedly winning a Oscar for it, along with the photography of same. It looks as if a considerable portion of Czech countryside was torn up to construct the trenches, bunkers, and battlefields riddled with shell craters for the film (reportedly, 30-acres filled with two and a half thousand extras). Color-wise, everything that is not muddy or bloody is gray.

You can’t fault the performances. But the Oscar-winning score by Volker Bertelmann is sparsely used in the film. I heard the three-note motif from the score more in the Oscar telecast than I did in the picture. The rest is mainly tonal drones or screeches. The film has been hard to see on the big screen. It was given a two-week run in select theaters last fall before moving on to Netflix on 28 October 2022, where it remained in the site’s Global Top 10 Films for 11 weeks. Because of this, box office returns for the $20 million production are not readily available, nor are they particularly relevant.


 
 Posted:   Mar 24, 2023 - 11:49 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Luther..the fallen sun.

Netflix film 2023

Oh dear. In the first few series of this, the serial killers were genuinely chilling. But here they have made the killer so far-fetched and so elaborate they become silly. Didnt help that they cast animation movement specialist Andy Serkis, who was about as chilling as half an ice cube.

And in turn Luther's (Idris Elba) solving the case to get to the killer from almost no clues at all is equally silly.
The ending got dafter n dafter, and they end up on the snowy wastes of Norway.

If the original series were probably 8.5/9 out of 10, this would be a 7.

Equally hideous was the end title song, originally perfect for Massive Attack and Hope Sandoval's voice, is instead "sung" lee-marvin-like, by Idris Elba. frown

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 24, 2023 - 3:29 PM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)

Young Guns of Texas(1962) 4/10
With Chill Wills, James Mitchum, Jody McCrea, Alana Ladd and Gary Conway

Conway is searching for $30000 in army money. It's been stolen by his brother. He is joined by the others in his quest. Along the way Mitchum and Ladd get married, complicating things. Her dad dislikes her new hubby.
A pretty pedestrian affair with the feel of a TV movie. The main draw is the young stars, children of three of the greats. While they are fine they don't mage to lift the film. Old timer Wills adds a bit of quality. Not much happens until the end.shoot out with some Indians.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2023 - 11:35 AM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

SHAZAM! FURY OF THE GODS (2023) – 7/10

I enjoyed this film more than I thought I was going to. Certainly Shazam! is the least serious of the DC franchises (and most of the Marvel franchises as well), so that helps. And there’s not much of a complicated back story of which you need to be aware, so that’s a boon as well.

Teenage “Billy Batson” (Asher Angel) lives with his foster parents “Rosa and Victor Vasquez” (Marta Milans and Cooper Andrews). He and his siblings have been bestowed superpowers from an ancient wizard (Djimon Hounsou), which they invoke by shouting “Shazam!” That also gives them adult bodies, although they still have the minds and emotions of teenagers. In the film, the adult Shazam (Zachary Levi) must battle two ancient gods, “ Kalypso” (Lucy Liu) and “Hespera” (Helen Mirren) for control of earth. These gods are able to summon a gigantic dragon and a plethora of other demons to destroy Shazam and his super hero siblings—“Freddy” (Adam Brody), “Eugene” (Ross Butler), “Pedro” (D.J. Cotrona), and “Darla” (Meagan Good).

The plot is fairly straight forward, the super hero fights are standard, and the special effects are good. Zach Levi handles the comic moments without making them seem lame. Christophe Beck provides a bombastic score (better than his recent one for ANT-MAN) that includes a good fanfare for Shazam.

Unlike many of the Marvel films, which seem to take place in fantasy worlds, the DC films generally take place on a recognizable Earth. In this case, the major battles take place in Philadelphia, with super heroes and evil gods repeatedly hurling each other through skyscrapers. While we watch an occasional civilian being killed by a dragon or demon, the unseen human carnage in these destroyed buildings must be tremendous. Maybe everyone is working from home these days.


 
 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2023 - 3:14 PM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)

Winchester '73(1950) 7/10
James Stewart, Stephen McNally, Shelley Winters, Dan Duryea
Jimmy is after McNally for reasons that become apparent. Along the way he wins the titular rifle, then loses it, and wants it back.
I hadn't watched this for ages, so time for another watch. It's one from a Stewart box set. It's an oldie but still a goodie. As well as the main cast there were some early roles for Tony Curtis ( billed as Anthony) and Rock Hudson ( billed as Pebble). Duryea stands out, as usual.

 
 Posted:   Mar 26, 2023 - 5:03 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT
2022

Ive seen the other versions so i finally got in the mood to sit through this. Very haunting imagery and cinematography, and the futility of war is rammed home with a mallet. I liked the concept of how they showed the dead soldier's uniforms with bullet holes n blood stains being repaired by an army of seamstresses.

Much has been said about the score so i watched with an open mind. The doom-laden 3-note motif occurs enough so you notice it (much like Williams's 3 mote motif in War of the worlds) and is very effective albeit a little awkward. What was worse was the random bursts of drums. As Bob says above, the rest is fairly routine drones and noises.
Overall it just about does a perfunctory job in the film, but oscar winner material? No, it aint in a million years. If i was the winning composer, id be embarrassed. Id take my oscar and walk across the stage n hand it to a more deserving recipient.

Film for me gets an 8. Score a 6.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 26, 2023 - 6:45 AM   
 By:   Tall Guy   (Member)

ALL QUIET ON THE WESTERN FRONT
2022

Ive seen the other versions so i finally got in the mood to sit through this. Very haunting imagery and cinematography, and the futility of war is rammed home with a mallet. I liked the concept of how they showed the dead soldier's uniforms with bullet holes n blood stains being repaired by an army of seamstresses.

Much has been said about the score so i watched with an open mind. The doom-laden 3-note motif occurs enough so you notice it (much like Williams's 3 mote motif in War of the worlds) and is very effective albeit a little awkward. What was worse was the random bursts of drums. As Bob says above, the rest is fairly routine drones and noises.
Overall it just about does a perfunctory job in the film, but oscar winner material? No, it aint in a million years. If i was the winning composer, id be embarrassed. Id take my oscar and walk across the stage n hand it to a more deserving recipient.

Film for me gets an 8. Score a 6.



I’ll say it again: Get with it, grandad! big grin

 
 Posted:   Mar 26, 2023 - 7:08 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

You can say it again n again, but in this case it does not apply. Ive never had a problem with largely-electronic scores and there has been some classics over the years from Halloween, Thief, Starman, loads. Apart from the effective but simple 3-note motif, this was very routine, bordering on run-of-the-mill, TG. We've all heard it before and better.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 26, 2023 - 7:28 AM   
 By:   Tall Guy   (Member)

Have you heard the half-hour suite, Bill? I wasn’t sure I’d like it away from the film (where honestly I thought it was stupendously effective) but I also enjoyed it in isolation. It worked for me; I’m sorry you didn’t care for it. Life goes on!

 
 Posted:   Mar 26, 2023 - 8:33 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

No, not listened to it outside of the film.
But it won for best score, not best 30-minute suite, right? Lol.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 26, 2023 - 10:23 AM   
 By:   joan hue   (Member)

The ending got dafter n dafter, and they end up on the snowy wastes of Norway.

If the original series were probably 8.5/9 out of 10, this would be a 7.


I agree with you, Bill. I liked the original series more than the movie. Still, I'd be open to another Luther movie.

 
 Posted:   Mar 26, 2023 - 10:54 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Yes joan, even stabbed and in freezing waters for a few minutes, Luther survived. Lol.

 
 Posted:   Mar 27, 2023 - 6:37 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Dragonslayer (Remastered) 4.5-5

I'm sure Ive reviewed this film before. There's some quirky bits of dialog, weak takes and unintentionally funny moments. But for the most part the performances are really top notch and on Game of Thrones level. I always found Peter MacNicol's acting rather amateurish and its unfortunate as hes the main protagonist.

For the record I watched the 4K remaster downsized to 1080p since I have a 1080p television. I thought the video quality was very uneven. Some scenes were crisp and clear while others seemed muddy, grainy and out of focus. They did the best they could with cleaning up matte lines.

Another member here commented on the "clouds rolling in" scene at the end of the film. They certainly don't look right to me. After doing some research on Blu-Ray.com some believe they used to much DNR for the last act of the film. That would explain its flatness and lack of detail.

The audio quality and sound design was amazing, at least with my stereo set up. Ive already commented on my feeling regarding the score which I found mostly out of place and distracting.

Some plot details are a bit questionable but over all its a solid film.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 27, 2023 - 11:46 AM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

THE DUELIST (2016) – 7/10

Not to be confused with 1977’s THE DUELLISTS, this film takes place in 1860 St. Petersburg, Russia, where the Tsarist noblemen are constantly challenging each other to duels for seemingly the smallest slight. But the (unwritten) rules of the time allow a person to have a proxy do one’s dueling for them. “Yakovlev” (Pyotr Fyodorov) is such a proxy. But he has carried it to a new level. Through an intermediary, he periodically receives a card with a name on it from an unknown source, along with payment. His assignment is to cross paths with the intended target and challenge him to a duel—then kill him.

Yakovlev has a back story. Once a nobleman himself, he was charged with a crime he didn’t commit by the powerful “Graf Beklemishev” (Vladimir Mashkov), stripped of his title, whipped within an inch of his life, and sold into service on a merchant ship bound for the Aleutians. When the ship sank, he was saved by some natives and has now returned under the identity of one of his dead shipmates, looking for retribution.

Written and directed by Aleksey Mizgiryov, this Russian film was nominated for ten Russian Golden Eagle film awards, winning for its stunning art direction, cinematography, and costumes. Igor Vdovin’s nominated score is not as sweeping as one would like. The performances are fine, particularly Yuliya Khlynina as a fiery “Princess Martha Tuchkova,” the one spot of beauty in this otherwise dark and male-dominated film.

Although the film becomes overwrought at times (one critic called it a “Putin fantasy” of manly Russia), it moves at a decent clip and holds one’s interest. Reportedly, the film was a commercial flop, costing (a relatively cheap) $11.4 million to produce, but grossing just $6.1 million worldwide. It was barely shown in U.S. theaters at all. But it’s worth catching on cable if you come across it.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 27, 2023 - 1:00 PM   
 By:   jenkwombat   (Member)

WAR OF THE WORLDS (1953)
8.5 / 10

I saw this film about 50 years ago when I was a child, and it frightened me because of its sense of claustrophobic impending doom. Seeing it now (on Criterion Blu-Ray), it's a very good film that stands the test of time quite well. Excellent special effects for the day, too.

 
 Posted:   Mar 27, 2023 - 1:13 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

WAR OF THE WORLDS (1953)
8.5 / 10

I saw this film about 50 years ago when I was a child, and it frightened me because of its sense of claustrophobic impending doom. Seeing it now (on Criterion Blu-Ray), it's a very good film that stands the test of time quite well. Excellent special effects for the day, too.


Great film. Remains memorizing.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 27, 2023 - 1:15 PM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)



Great film. Remains memorizing.


C'mon Sol. 'Mesmerising '!

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.