Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 12:02 PM   
 By:   nuts_score   (Member)



This is so awesome! Thanks for sharing, Francis!!

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 12:12 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

And for a completely different opinion someone said this on another board...

I saw Mad Max: Fury Road. I don't get it. And yet I see rotten tomatoes gives it 99%.

Imagine that The Road Warrior was remade by Micheal Bay. Transformers:Outback. Giant machines fight each other, with some people hanging on.

I didn't care about anything or anyone. Just a big video game.

Tom Hardy has a muffled, semi-Bane voice.


Well, it does have 98% critical consensus. There's always guaranteed to be 2% that just simply won't get it. I'm hoping you'll like it, for a change, Solium. Bring your buddy Ado along! big grin


I don't know if I'll go to the theater, if I do it will be an impulse decision. But I eagerly await the BluRay or streaming option. smile

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 12:16 PM   
 By:   nuts_score   (Member)

I don't know if I'll go to the theater, if I do it will be an impulse decision. But I eagerly await the BluRay or streaming option. smile

Can I send you some Fandango credits to get you into the theater?

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 12:29 PM   
 By:   nuts_score   (Member)

I was just reading a think-piece on Avatar's flash-in-the-pan popularity. It got me thinking: if James Cameron wants to stay "the King" of this epic Action cinema, he's gonna need to copy some pages from George Miller's new playbook.

 
 
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 12:36 PM   
 By:   henry   (Member)

And for a completely different opinion someone said this on another board...

I saw Mad Max: Fury Road. I don't get it. And yet I see rotten tomatoes gives it 99%.

Imagine that The Road Warrior was remade by Micheal Bay. Transformers:Outback. Giant machines fight each other, with some people hanging on.

I didn't care about anything or anyone. Just a big video game.

Tom Hardy has a muffled, semi-Bane voice.


Well, it does have 98% critical consensus. There's always guaranteed to be 2% that just simply won't get it. I'm hoping you'll like it, for a change, Solium. Bring your buddy Ado along! big grin


I don't know if I'll go to the theater, if I do it will be an impulse decision. But I eagerly await the BluRay or streaming option. smile


solium, this film is a theater experience if there ever was one. You really should go see it. I'm going for my third time this week.

 
 
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 12:44 PM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)

I've seen it twice in the cinema, and I'll see it again there.

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 12:56 PM   
 By:   mastadge   (Member)

This movie is an experience. For the plot-oriented (as with the earlier films in the series) there's not necessarily much there. But this is an astonishing visual visceral accomplishment. Comparing it to Michael Bay is ridiculous. Michael Bay's a guy with a decent eye who latched onto some cinematic techniques to blow everything to epic proportions*. Miller actually has a solid grasp of cinematography and uses the whole visual lexicon to create a whole experience. Bay finds violence sexy. Miller understands that it's insane. Bay ignores physics in his quest for the cool. Miller embraces physics and so his violence feels so much more grounded than most of what Bay does -- because it's really happening there.

I do agree, though, that Hardy's surprisingly high-pitched voice and not-Australian accent were a surprise that took a lot of getting used to.

*

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 1:14 PM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

Tom Hardy has a "high-pitched" voice? Sounded fairly middle-of-the-road to me.

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 1:14 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

I loved ROAD WARRIOR and the reviews sound like its basically a remake with just-as-good action sequences.So, why do i need to see this?

bruce

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2015 - 1:57 PM   
 By:   nuts_score   (Member)

I loved ROAD WARRIOR and the reviews sound like its basically a remake with just-as-good action sequences.So, why do i need to see this?

To my dearest Bruce:

It has a few things in common with The Road Warrior: same franchise, same lead character, auto chases and mind-blowing stunts. Otherwise its hardly a remake of The Road Warrior. You loved The Road Warrior? So did the others on this board and other places whom are finding this film a remarkable change of pace against the current superhero and Michael Bay action cinema. You answered your basic question just by referencing your basic affection for The Road Warrior. Simple enough, huh?

___

Also, I picked up the new Shout Factory Blu Ray of Mad Max over the weekend. I had already owned Warner's previous trilogy set from a couple of years ago. But the new interviews on this (relatively budgeted: $10.99) release made it worth it -- I also found the new cover art to be very spiffy. So, yes, again this weekend I breezed through the previous three Mad Max films with my lady and came into my third viewing of Fury Road retaining all of those visual flourishes and tics that Miller has kept up for all of these years. I love the shots that dolly from the revving V8 engines to a wide shot of the front of the car. It's such a classic camera move. I love the sweeping car-mounted camera glides across the highway; the intimate close-ups are also such a beautiful highlight of why Miller's visual storytelling works. And I love that even in Fury Road, Miller has retained an editorial knack for removing frames from anxious sequences. Scorsese and the wonderful editor Thelma Schoonmaker still regularly employ this tic and honestly I regret that no one else does. From a "palette" perspective, it is a technique that really heightens the surreality of 24fps and makes a film and action sequences move that much faster.

 
 
 Posted:   May 21, 2015 - 12:16 AM   
 By:   groovemeister   (Member)

Been waiting 30 years for this, and holy crap, was it worth it !!!!!


'Bonkers' and 'Insane' are two words created specifically in the English dictionary for this film !

GO SEE IT, with a good box-office result, Miller's planning on making another one ! ! !

 
 
 Posted:   May 21, 2015 - 1:19 AM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)

I think "Bat-shit crazy" is the most correct descriptive.

Pure cinema, unbridled and undiluted by the look and feel of it.

 
 Posted:   May 21, 2015 - 8:41 AM   
 By:   nuts_score   (Member)

A nagging criticism I'd like to address is some group of viewers noting that Max Rockatansky plays second fiddle or hardly has anything to do in this film. Or that Tom Hardy is barely in it. I question their abilities to not only pay attention, but also if they have seen The Road Warrior or Beyond Thunderdome.

That is ridiculous. The characters of Max and Furiosa are interdependent on one another. Tom Hardy "barely in it"? He's in the whole thing!


I agree completely Drop Forge. There's a reason why the first title card of the movie features Hardy and Theron right next to each other, announcing their co-lead status. I'd argue that this film juggles dual protagonist better than almost most, simply because the plot revolves around them working together to accomplish the goal established from the beginning. The plotting of the film is airtight.

 
 Posted:   May 21, 2015 - 10:01 AM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

There's a reason why the first title card of the movie features Hardy and Theron right next to each other, announcing their co-lead status.

That should be evidence enough, right?

 
 Posted:   May 21, 2015 - 9:28 PM   
 By:   nuts_score   (Member)

There's a reason why the first title card of the movie features Hardy and Theron right next to each other, announcing their co-lead status.

That should be evidence enough, right?


To you and me and 85% of the audience it seems. You can never help the dim-witted, though.

 
 
 Posted:   May 22, 2015 - 1:44 AM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)

The emotional beats of the plot belong more to Furiosa then Max, because she is the one driving (no pun intended) the narrative with her escape from the Citadel to the "Green Place".

Max is a very reluctant bystander who gets taken along for the ride. And only very late in the film does Max actually decide to participate.

But the same thing actually happens in The Road Warrior, where Max ends up in the compound not wanting to get involved.

 
 Posted:   May 22, 2015 - 10:36 AM   
 By:   nuts_score   (Member)

Max is a very reluctant bystander who gets taken along for the ride. And only very late in the film does Max actually decide to participate.

But the same thing actually happens in The Road Warrior, where Max ends up in the compound not wanting to get involved.


And similar plotting occurs in Beyond Thunderdome once Max comes into contact with Auntie Entity. According to Miller in the recent Q&A with Jeff Goldsmith podcast, this is essentially the "formula" of the Mad Max sequels. Max will likely always take the position as the reluctant protagonist. This approach is also what sets Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom apart for me, as well. It's the narrative when Indiana find himself reluctantly drawn into a larger plot, and ultimately the only film in that series where his quest is greater than fortune and glory.

 
 Posted:   May 23, 2015 - 4:52 PM   
 By:   TominAtl   (Member)

Faaaantastic movie. And putting Theron in it sealed the deal. It's the greatest thrill ride I've had in a movie house in a very long time.

 
 Posted:   May 24, 2015 - 3:32 AM   
 By:   JohnnyG   (Member)

Max is a very reluctant bystander who gets taken along for the ride. And only very late in the film does Max actually decide to participate.

But the same thing actually happens in The Road Warrior, where Max ends up in the compound not wanting to get involved.


And similar plotting occurs in Beyond Thunderdome once Max comes into contact with Auntie Entity. According to Miller in the recent Q&A with Jeff Goldsmith podcast, this is essentially the "formula" of the Mad Max sequels. Max will likely always take the position as the reluctant protagonist. This approach is also what sets Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom apart for me, as well. It's the narrative when Indiana find himself reluctantly drawn into a larger plot, and ultimately the only film in that series where his quest is greater than fortune and glory.



What's greater than fortune and glory? big grin

 
 Posted:   May 24, 2015 - 2:50 PM   
 By:   nuts_score   (Member)

What's greater than fortune and glory? big grin

Well, not much but when the stakes are the liberation of enslaved children and communities I think we can make amends. big grin

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.