Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2011 - 6:22 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

While we're all obsessed with John Barry, can anyone tell me the track running order of the UK LP of Goldfinger, and where side 2 begins?

 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2011 - 6:34 PM   
 By:   WILLIAMDMCCRUM   (Member)

Side 1:


Main Title: 'Goldfinger' and 'Into Miami'

'Golden Girl'

'Alpine Drive' - 'Auric's Factory'

'Death of Tilley'

'Oddjob's Pressing Engagement'

'The Laser Beam'



Side 2:


'Bond Back in Action Again'

'Pussy Galore's Flying Circus'

'Teasing the Korean'

'Gassing the Gangsters'

'Dawn Raid on Fort Knox'

'The Arrival of the Bomb, and Countdown'

'The Death of Goldfinger' - End Title.

 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2011 - 6:44 PM   
 By:   WILLIAMDMCCRUM   (Member)

P.S. I've just checked on 'Soundtrack Collector' site, and they list an earlier LP than mine:

Track listing

1. Main Title-Goldfinger/Into Miami (03:14)
Sung by Shirley Bassey
2. Alpine Drive-Auric's Factory (03:15)

3. Oddjob's Pressing Engagement (03:05)

4. Bond Back In Action Again (02:29)

5. Teasing The Korean (02:12)

6. Gassing The Gangsters (01:03)

7. Goldfinger (02:22)
Instrumental Version
8. Dawn Raid On Fort Knox (06:43)

9. The Arrival Of The Bomb And Countdown (03:36)

10. The Death Of Goldfinger-End Titles (02:34)


Total Duration: 00:30:33

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2011 - 7:53 PM   
 By:   JimWynorski   (Member)

The first line up is correct. The second is the American LP track listing. I have both versions, and the Brit version always had four more tracks than the American - but deleted the rockin instrumental version.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2011 - 8:09 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

Thank you both!!!

 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2011 - 9:09 PM   
 By:   George Komar   (Member)

...but deleted the rockin instrumental version.

That instrumental was recorded in mono, for a 45 rpm single presumably.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 1, 2011 - 9:21 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

...but deleted the rockin instrumental version.

That instrumental was recorded in mono, for a 45 rpm single presumably.


MONO is better than stereo.

That track sounds like sh*t on the CD, BTW. Completely out of phase. Hope they docked the producer(s) for this egregious error.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 2, 2011 - 5:32 AM   
 By:   Membership Expired   (Member)



MONO is better than stereo


If you have one ear, maybe....

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 2, 2011 - 4:56 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)



MONO is better than stereo


If you have one ear, maybe....


I have two ears and I prefer mono for any pop/rock/jazzy stuff.

A great mono mix is better than a weak stereo mix. The proof is in the grooves.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 5, 2014 - 5:55 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

Recently picked up a minty stereo German pressing of the UK LP. I'd only had the US LP, and then when the expanded CD came out, heard the lost tracks only as bonus tracks tacked onto the end.

Aside from gorgeous sonics, this is a much better album. Sure, there are more tracks, but the flow makes much more sense. It generally runs in film order with a few things out of sequence for flow purposes.

I always thought side 2 of the US LP was weak. The transition from the beat group version of Goldfinger to the Dawn Raid track seemed like such an extreme jump.

So, if you have the CD, do yourself a favor and try sequencing the tracks in the UK LP order.

 
 
 Posted:   Sep 13, 2016 - 6:28 AM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

Bumping this thread.

Given that the Bond albums were the same for the US and UK, does anyone know why the US and UK track lineups of Goldfinger were so different? I understand that the US label wanted an instrumental version of the theme - which ironically is all over the score anyway - but why did they delete FOUR tracks to make room for ONE? They could have easily just replaced one of the tracks with the instrumental theme. Any ideas?

 
 Posted:   Sep 13, 2016 - 7:34 AM   
 By:   Stephen Woolston   (Member)

Bumping this thread.

Given that the Bond albums were the same for the US and UK, does anyone know why the US and UK track lineups of Goldfinger were so different? I understand that the US label wanted an instrumental version of the theme - which ironically is all over the score anyway - but why did they delete FOUR tracks to make room for ONE? They could have easily just replaced one of the tracks with the instrumental theme. Any ideas?


Actually the US and UK Bond LP's weren't always the same.

The UK LP of You Only Live Twice had a different version of the final track to the US LP.

And the US mono LP of Thunderball had a different version of Mr Kiss Kiss Bang Bang to the UK mono LP.

But these were, I think, the only differences.

Why? I don't know myself.

 
 Posted:   Sep 13, 2016 - 9:13 AM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

Bumping this thread.

Given that the Bond albums were the same for the US and UK, does anyone know why the US and UK track lineups of Goldfinger were so different? I understand that the US label wanted an instrumental version of the theme - which ironically is all over the score anyway - but why did they delete FOUR tracks to make room for ONE? They could have easily just replaced one of the tracks with the instrumental theme. Any ideas?


As guesses only:
To keep the running time under 30' so as to be commercial. All of the four tracks omitted are less main-theme orientated and only one, Pussy Galore's Flying Circus, is particularly melodic in an easy-listening way. We select film score fans love those under-score tracks but for the general public a pop-style arrangement of the main theme has to be preferable to the intense, repetitive cue which accompanies Bond being sliced by a laser beam.

Perhaps the title of the mentioned track - given the reported controversy of the heroine's name in the US at that time - lead to that track being omitted.

Coincidentally I've listened to the score twice in the last few days, having not played it for almost two years, and it remains a wonderful score albeit surpassed by several other JB~JB007 scores. My ripped version plays in approx. film order with the track Bond Back in Action Again providing the perfect start.

Mitch

 
 Posted:   Sep 13, 2016 - 9:38 AM   
 By:   Sean Nethery   (Member)

My LP encounter with Goldfinger was the 10th Anniversary James Bond Album Superpak, a double album featuring suites from Dr. No through Diamonds Are Forever. My favorite was side 2, which was absolutely killer in 1973, with the suite from Goldfinger and two tracks from Thunderball.

1. Goldfinger - Main Title/Into Miami (03:14)

2. Auric's Factory (02:28)

3. Bond Back In Action Again (02:29)

4. Goldfinger - Instrumental (02:08)

5. The Death Of Goldfinger - End Title (02:34)

6. Mr. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang (03:13)

7. 007 (02:30)

I loved this double album so much I never bought the full soundtracks on lp, though of course did later on cassette and CD. Though I would have sworn "Dawn Raid" was on here (clearly not), it was a great summary of the score.

 
 Posted:   Sep 13, 2016 - 1:54 PM   
 By:   nilnav45   (Member)

My first James Bond soundtrack purchase was also the 10th anniversary collection which did encourage me to go on to buy the individual soundtrack LPs.
I think the version that we got in Europe was the best - check out the artwork.

https://www.discogs.com/Various-James-Bond-Collection/master/173469

 
 Posted:   Sep 13, 2016 - 2:25 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

bRITISH ALBUMS OF 007, bEATLES ETC HAVE MORE TRACKS FOR A SIMPLE BUT OBVIOUS REASON: PUBLISHING ROYALTIES.

FOR EXAMPLE:
Rubber Soul" by The Beatles
if Capitol kept the 14 tracks of the UK EMI lp, they would have to pay out royalties to the composers of the 2 extra tracks.
SO, let us say the lp sells for 4 dollars and sells one million copies. Four million dollars gross.
If the 2 extra tracks earn 5 cents royalty per album -10 cents total- that is 100,000 dollars less for the record company!!!!
brm

 
 
 Posted:   Sep 13, 2016 - 9:04 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

bRITISH ALBUMS OF 007, bEATLES ETC HAVE MORE TRACKS FOR A SIMPLE BUT OBVIOUS REASON: PUBLISHING ROYALTIES.


Wow, so all of the UK Bond albums have additional tracks? I had no idea. Thanks for the heads up! I will seek them out!



 
 Posted:   Sep 14, 2016 - 2:54 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

bRITISH ALBUMS OF 007, bEATLES ETC HAVE MORE TRACKS FOR A SIMPLE BUT OBVIOUS REASON: PUBLISHING ROYALTIES.


Wow, so all of the UK Bond albums have additional tracks? I had no idea. Thanks for the heads up! I will seek them out!


Sorry, just GOLDFINGER

 
 Posted:   Sep 14, 2016 - 3:10 PM   
 By:   Stefan Huber   (Member)

I still think that the absence of the pre-1965 tapes is one of the saddest losses in the history of soundtrack collecting frown I think I would give much to hear the love music from "Goldfinger" from the original multi-channel masters. Will not happen...

Let alone the fact that the post-1973 scores DO exist and nobody wants to release them frown

 
 
 Posted:   Sep 14, 2016 - 4:55 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)


As guesses only:
To keep the running time under 30' so as to be commercial. All of the four tracks omitted are less main-theme orientated and only one, Pussy Galore's Flying Circus, is particularly melodic in an easy-listening way.


This is an interesting observation! The album tends to play more mono-thematically without those four tracks.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.