Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Mar 22, 2024 - 2:47 PM   
 By:   Indy1981   (Member)

Graham Chapman
John Cleese
Eric Idle
Terry Jones
Michael Palin

or Terry Gilliam?

Discuss.

 
 Posted:   Mar 22, 2024 - 2:53 PM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

All had different strengths and specialities.

Cleese n Palin were funnier to me, but that's just individual humour taste. But equally the others all had sketches and performances that were faultless.

 
 Posted:   Mar 22, 2024 - 3:24 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Cleese always stood out the most, I don’t know why. Maybe because he played the straight man? They were all funny.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 22, 2024 - 3:32 PM   
 By:   Indy1981   (Member)

Cleese was whom I wanted to be. He was among my comedic heroes, but Eric Idle was so good in the Rutles movie and such an appealing, endearing sort of fellow, so I've always had a soft spot for him.

 
 Posted:   Mar 22, 2024 - 3:53 PM   
 By:   Nicolai P. Zwar   (Member)

Graham Chapman
John Cleese
Eric Idle
Terry Jones
Michael Palin

or Terry Gilliam?

Discuss.


Monty Python was all of these. They were a unit.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 23, 2024 - 1:53 AM   
 By:   Doc Loch   (Member)

Carol Cleveland.

 
 Posted:   Mar 23, 2024 - 3:26 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Carol Cleveland.

That's funny.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 23, 2024 - 4:10 AM   
 By:   Indy1981   (Member)

Carol Cleveland.

Now if you're going to split hairs, I'll piss off.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 23, 2024 - 1:13 PM   
 By:   Doc Loch   (Member)

Hey, I'm just honoring the decision in the All-England Summarize Proust Competition.

 
 Posted:   Mar 23, 2024 - 1:39 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Dave Foley.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 23, 2024 - 3:00 PM   
 By:   Indy1981   (Member)

The job interview scene from The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin is imo the most Pythonesque non-Python scene ever made.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 23, 2024 - 3:01 PM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

Chapman was the real genius, I think. I remember hearing or reading something about him being responsible for the more absurd skits, which I prefer. But obviously, Cleese was and is the towering figure.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2024 - 4:28 AM   
 By:   Indy1981   (Member)

I liked Monty Python and the Holy Grail and parts of Life of Brian, but I much prefer the TV series over the films. I don't care for Monty Python's Meaning of Life. The loud, "big budget" 1980s aesthetic imo just doesn't suit Python, though there are worthy comedic moments.

 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2024 - 4:38 AM   
 By:   Nicolai P. Zwar   (Member)

I agree that Monty Pythons was best in its absurdist comedy TV show, and Monty Python's first feature length movie, And Now for Something Completely Different was basically just selected sketches from that show. (So that movie feels like one longer Monty Python Flying Circus TV show.)

 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2024 - 5:19 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Holy grail was comedy genius from beginning to end.

Despite one or two pythonesque characters (terrific race, the romans), Life of Brian changed to more general humour to get a bigger audience (the whole biggus dickus giggling sequence and Welease Woger) was not very python at all, although still funny.

People forget but huge swathes of the episodes, sometimes whole episodes, were unfunny crap. And this admission from a fan who watched from the beginning and bought the LPs (and has rewatched the lot in recent years). When the sketches were good, they were great classics. And these are the ones people remember. When they didn't really work, they were awkward.

Their highlights stuff - like And Now for something completely different film - and the LPs - were always well-chosen. The cream at top was delicious, but a lot of the milk underneath was very ordinary yoghurt.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2024 - 5:54 AM   
 By:   Indy1981   (Member)

Their highlights stuff - like And Now for something completely different film - and the LPs - were always well-chosen. The cream at top was delicious, but a lot of the milk underneath was very ordinary yoghurt.

In other words, Python were just like every other pop culture or artistic phenomenon: 99% crap!

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2024 - 5:57 AM   
 By:   Indy1981   (Member)

Holy grail was comedy genius from beginning to end.

When watching the film, I am always impressed by just how good Graham Chapman was as a "leading man."

 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2024 - 6:00 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Their highlights stuff - like And Now for something completely different film - and the LPs - were always well-chosen. The cream at top was delicious, but a lot of the milk underneath was very ordinary yoghurt.

In other words, Python were just like every other pop culture or artistic phenomenon: 99% crap!



Nooo, more like 65% crap 35% utter genius wink

 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2024 - 6:01 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

I’ve only seen snippets of Flying Circus. Like Bill said it was a crap shoot. Holy Grail was my favorite film but I find Life of Brian funnier now and quit ingenious. Meaning of Life was unfunny and gross. What I saw of it at least.

 
 Posted:   Mar 25, 2024 - 6:05 AM   
 By:   Nicolai P. Zwar   (Member)

Holy grail was comedy genius from beginning to end.

Despite one or two pythonesque characters (terrific race, the romans), Life of Brian changed to more general humour to get a bigger audience (the whole biggus dickus giggling sequence and Welease Woger) was not very python at all, although still funny.


I agree, these were are funny films to this day.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.