Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Feb 24, 2015 - 5:17 PM   
 By:   tgjackson93   (Member)


Almost 100% of the 'big awards' went to the wrong person.

Disgraceful!

[url]https://tgjackson93.wordpress.com/2015/02/24/another-year-gone/[/url]

https://tgjackson93.wordpress.com/2015/02/24/another-year-gone

 
 Posted:   Feb 24, 2015 - 5:26 PM   
 By:   Ron Pulliam   (Member)

Your link disagrees with your hyperbole.

As a matter of fact, the actors who won took home every award this year. SOMEbody must think they deserved them.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 24, 2015 - 5:39 PM   
 By:   Thgil   (Member)

Another reason I can't stand award season: people thinking the awards went to the wrong people. It's all subjective. Get over it.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 24, 2015 - 5:49 PM   
 By:   tgjackson93   (Member)

I wouldn't say my article contradicts my hyperbole necessarily.

Also I can't stand Awards Season because it's full of people who say they hate Awards Season because they're so above populist films and film recognition. I can appreciate that all the awards are subjective but inevitably some people are predisposed to like certain films over others, such as ourselves and the not-so-impartial Academy.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 24, 2015 - 6:09 PM   
 By:   John Mullin   (Member)

It also isn't about film music. Shouldn't it be over in "Non-Film Score Disussion"?

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 24, 2015 - 8:45 PM   
 By:   MOsdtks   (Member)

It also isn't about film music. Shouldn't it be over in "Non-Film Score Disussion"?

Way to much speechifying on this show.
Go up get your little statue say thank you to those who have helped you. Be gracious then get off.
A.K. Simmons acceptance speech was classy.
Alexandre Desplat was charming and genuine. (there is your film music discussion)
But there was bloviating about gay rights, civil rights, women's rights, veterans, immigrants, ALS awareness , Alzhiemer awareness, government spying awareness. Not that any of these things aren't real concerns, but enough already.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 24, 2015 - 10:30 PM   
 By:   barryfan   (Member)

Desplat's Budapest Hotel was the best of the lot because it added the most to its movie.

I saw the trailer for The Theory of Everything and I leaned over to the person I was with and said, "That kid will win Best Actor." No lie.

JK Simmons was the best choice out of the Supporting Actors. I have loved his work since his Law and Order days. And his J. Jonah Jameson scenes in Raimi's Spider Man movies were the best scenes in those movies.


I am lukewarm on the overrated Boyhood, but Patricia Arquette was indeed the best thing about it.

Haven't seen Julianne Moore's Still Alice.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 5:33 AM   
 By:   CinemaScope   (Member)

Apart from the people nominated (& their family & parents), does anyone really care who won or didn't win. It's all a load of nothing.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 5:47 AM   
 By:   Graham Watt   (Member)

Apart from the people nominated (& their family & parents), does anyone really care who won or didn't win. It's all a load of nothing.

Yeah, I'm still smarting from that smack in the face back in '69 when Barbara Streisand beat Kate Hepburn, Butterfly McQueen beat Goldie Hawn, Michael J. Pollard beat Bradford Dillman, Arthur Hiller beat Franklin Schaffner, Doodie Wilson beat Alfred Newman, Dick Bush beat Owen Roizman, William Goldman beat Jimmy Sangster, and Dorothy Pavillion beat Edith Head... or was that actually in '68...?

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 8:36 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

The Oscars, like the Grammys, are a relic of a time when awards mattered to the public, I think that the internet and it's blogs and boards and armchair movie critics with websites have thoroughly eroded the relevance of these awards.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 9:21 AM   
 By:   MikeP   (Member)

The Oscars, like the Grammys, are a relic of a time when awards mattered to the public, I think that the internet and it's blogs and boards and armchair movie critics with websites have thoroughly eroded the relevance of these awards.



These internet armchair critics or "Look, I have my own awards" blogs do not matter a bit to the industry. The public though, yeah, probably already get their fill from the great unwashed online razz

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 9:30 AM   
 By:   tgjackson93   (Member)

The Oscars, like the Grammys, are a relic of a time when awards mattered to the public, I think that the internet and it's blogs and boards and armchair movie critics with websites have thoroughly eroded the relevance of these awards.



These internet armchair critics or "Look, I have my own awards" blogs do not matter a bit to the industry. The public though, yeah, probably already get their fill from the great unwashed online razz


It amuses me when people use that criticism. I can't imagine many people who write something similar to what I've written think that what they say has any impact on the industry. It's just written for a bit of fun, to entertain and express your views and spark discussion, not to actually impart wisdom.

Evidently the Oscars still have some prevalence to the film society, even with a 16% drop in the US they were viewed by 36.6m people - that's not counting global audiences. Bear in mind the 'stars' that turn up and claim it to be the pinnacle of their achievements too, the Oscars still matter - they're iconic. Also their relevance is not eroded by armchair critics as the Academy tends to be experienced and of expertise. Clearly unlike myself and everyone else here..

 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 9:33 AM   
 By:   Ron Pulliam   (Member)

Obviously Oscars DO matter! Look at the posts to this thread. Especially the ones foaming over about them not mattering at all.

Apparently, they do.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 9:52 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

The Oscars, like the Grammys, are a relic of a time when awards mattered to the public, I think that the internet and it's blogs and boards and armchair movie critics with websites have thoroughly eroded the relevance of these awards.



These internet armchair critics or "Look, I have my own awards" blogs do not matter a bit to the industry. The public though, yeah, probably already get their fill from the great unwashed online razz


It amuses me when people use that criticism. I can't imagine many people who write something similar to what I've written think that what they say has any impact on the industry. It's just written for a bit of fun, to entertain and express your views and spark discussion, not to actually impart wisdom.

Evidently the Oscars still have some prevalence to the film society, even with a 16% drop in the US they were viewed by 36.6m people - that's not counting global audiences. Bear in mind the 'stars' that turn up and claim it to be the pinnacle of their achievements too, the Oscars still matter - they're iconic. Also their relevance is not eroded by armchair critics as the Academy tends to be experienced and of expertise. Clearly unlike myself and everyone else here..



That was a highly skilled and well written completely missing the point of what I said.
I would say that was expert level missing the point.

Pretty good chance you work in the industry and maybe even a voting member.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 9:54 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

The Oscars, like the Grammys, are a relic of a time when awards mattered to the public, I think that the internet and it's blogs and boards and armchair movie critics with websites have thoroughly eroded the relevance of these awards.



These internet armchair critics or "Look, I have my own awards" blogs do not matter a bit to the industry. The public though, yeah, probably already get their fill from the great unwashed online razz


Congrats, you actually got the point, unlike someone else who joined the board - just today.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 9:56 AM   
 By:   tgjackson93   (Member)

The Oscars, like the Grammys, are a relic of a time when awards mattered to the public, I think that the internet and it's blogs and boards and armchair movie critics with websites have thoroughly eroded the relevance of these awards.



These internet armchair critics or "Look, I have my own awards" blogs do not matter a bit to the industry. The public though, yeah, probably already get their fill from the great unwashed online razz


Congrats, you actually got the point, unlike someone else who joined the board - just today.



I hardly think that how recently anyone joined the board has any relevance

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 9:58 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

The Oscars, like the Grammys, are a relic of a time when awards mattered to the public, I think that the internet and it's blogs and boards and armchair movie critics with websites have thoroughly eroded the relevance of these awards.



These internet armchair critics or "Look, I have my own awards" blogs do not matter a bit to the industry. The public though, yeah, probably already get their fill from the great unwashed online razz


Congrats, you actually got the point, unlike someone else who joined the board - just today.



I hardly think that how recently anyone joined the board has any relevance


Yeah, you are surely in the industry, and your surely joined ruffled of the feathers, and if I think it is relevant to me, then it is relevant. So what do you do in the industry?

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 10:03 AM   
 By:   tgjackson93   (Member)

Can't argue with your overwhelming logic and you've arrived at a great conclusion, congrats.

You think just because someone can write eloquently and disagrees with you must be "in the industry"?

Or you're being sarcastic which is very clever. And mocking me for thinking I ought to be "in the industry".

Whichever it is, they're both excellently crafted arguments, well done!!

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 10:08 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

Can't argue with your overwhelming logic and you've arrived at a great conclusion, congrats.

You think just because someone can write eloquently and disagrees with you must be "in the industry"?

Or you're being sarcastic which is very clever. And mocking me for thinking I ought to be "in the industry".

Whichever it is, they're both excellently crafted arguments, well done!!


I love it when people call themselves eloquent, eloquent is up for debate, smug and arrogant, that is for sure. Welcome to the blocklist.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 25, 2015 - 10:09 AM   
 By:   tgjackson93   (Member)

Can't argue with your overwhelming logic and you've arrived at a great conclusion, congrats.

You think just because someone can write eloquently and disagrees with you must be "in the industry"?

Or you're being sarcastic which is very clever. And mocking me for thinking I ought to be "in the industry".

Whichever it is, they're both excellently crafted arguments, well done!!


I love it when people call themselves eloquent, eloquent is up for debate, smug and arrogant, that is for sure. Welcome to the blocklist.


It's an honour.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.