Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Jul 23, 2017 - 5:02 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

In ST:VI (on the Klingon ship), and the evil universe in an Enterprise episode, there's demonstrations of anti-grav deck plating. I dunno if "inertial control" is also a form of anti-grav.

Yeah, I was trying to remember if B9 was equipped with thrusters, but I couldnt firmly recall so I didnt bring it up. Knowing LIS, it's so improbable that it must be true.



I was joking about the Robot having rocket thruster's. I think there's an episode where he's floating in space helplessly just like an un-tethered astronaut.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 23, 2017 - 6:36 PM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

In ST:VI (on the Klingon ship), and the evil universe in an Enterprise episode, there's demonstrations of anti-grav deck plating. I dunno if "inertial control" is also a form of anti-grav.

Yeah, I was trying to remember if B9 was equipped with thrusters, but I couldnt firmly recall so I didnt bring it up. Knowing LIS, it's so improbable that it must be true.



I was joking about the Robot having rocket thruster's. I think there's an episode where he's floating in space helplessly just like an un-tethered astronaut.


I could swear there's some implication that he could blast off (maybe I'm thinking of Tom Servo), but that's a good point about that untethered scene - he didnt jet around then. Maybe they mention it later in the series. Btw, that's actually a pretty amazing scene for all it suggests (I say suggest because it's not the best executed scene). The Professor goes out to rescue B9 framed in Sistine Chapel imagery. While he often refers to it as valuable equipment rather than sentient, the scene suggests otherwise. I wonder if fundamentalists have criticized it for being sacrilegious.

 
 Posted:   Jul 23, 2017 - 8:18 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

In ST:VI (on the Klingon ship), and the evil universe in an Enterprise episode, there's demonstrations of anti-grav deck plating. I dunno if "inertial control" is also a form of anti-grav.

Yeah, I was trying to remember if B9 was equipped with thrusters, but I couldnt firmly recall so I didnt bring it up. Knowing LIS, it's so improbable that it must be true.



I was joking about the Robot having rocket thruster's. I think there's an episode where he's floating in space helplessly just like an un-tethered astronaut.


I could swear there's some implication that he could blast off (maybe I'm thinking of Tom Servo), but that's a good point about that untethered scene - he didnt jet around then. Maybe they mention it later in the series. Btw, that's actually a pretty amazing scene for all it suggests (I say suggest because it's not the best executed scene). The Professor goes out to rescue B9 framed in Sistine Chapel imagery. While he often refers to it as valuable equipment rather than sentient, the scene suggests otherwise. I wonder if fundamentalists have criticized it for being sacrilegious.



One thing I love about "old" sci fi are clunky robots. (all the way up to Star Wars 77) Nowadays with CGI, robots move swiftly, transform, and are basically robotic Swiss army knives who always have the right tool or equipment for the moment. (R2D2 became the all in one droid from Empire on)

I still think slow, clunky robots with limited abilities are cool and effective sci fi props.

 
 Posted:   Jul 24, 2017 - 10:07 AM   
 By:   jackfu   (Member)

In ST:VI (on the Klingon ship), and the evil universe in an Enterprise episode, there's demonstrations of anti-grav deck plating. I dunno if "inertial control" is also a form of anti-grav.

Yeah, I was trying to remember if B9 was equipped with thrusters, but I couldnt firmly recall so I didnt bring it up. Knowing LIS, it's so improbable that it must be true.



I was joking about the Robot having rocket thruster's. I think there's an episode where he's floating in space helplessly just like an un-tethered astronaut.


I could swear there's some implication that he could blast off (maybe I'm thinking of Tom Servo), but that's a good point about that untethered scene - he didnt jet around then. Maybe they mention it later in the series. Btw, that's actually a pretty amazing scene for all it suggests (I say suggest because it's not the best executed scene). The Professor goes out to rescue B9 framed in Sistine Chapel imagery. While he often refers to it as valuable equipment rather than sentient, the scene suggests otherwise. I wonder if fundamentalists have criticized it for being sacrilegious.



Don't know if fundamentalists criticized it, haven't read of any that did. I wonder if atheists criticized it for having Sistine Chapel imagery religious overtones.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 24, 2017 - 11:36 AM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

Don't know if fundamentalists criticized it, haven't read of any that did. I wonder if atheists criticized it for having Sistine Chapel imagery religious overtones.

Touche, I guess that framing could imply an analogy with the intelligent creator theory. I never considered the biblical scene reality, just part of historical art and fiction, and how it symbolically gives B9 more stature than mere machine.

 
 Posted:   Jul 24, 2017 - 7:24 PM   
 By:   Metryq   (Member)

"Not the Craw, the Craw!!

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 8:34 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

A Star Trek TOS question:

Which "real-life" Earth nations, if any, do the Klingons, Romulans, Andorians, etc. represent?

Thanks in advance.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 8:41 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

A Star Trek TOS question:

Which "real-life" Earth nations, if any, do the Klingons, Romulans, Andorians, etc. represent?

Thanks in advance.


They're not from Earth. Unless they attacked and occupy areas of the planet, (which I never heard of) it would be none.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 8:44 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

A Star Trek TOS question:

Which "real-life" Earth nations, if any, do the Klingons, Romulans, Andorians, etc. represent?

Thanks in advance.


They're not from Earth. Unless they attacked and occupy areas of the planet, (which I never heard of) it would be none.


Apologies, old sport. I meant in an allegorical sense. I'm pretty sure the Klingons were supposed to be the Soviet Union.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 9:28 AM   
 By:   Metryq   (Member)

Jim Phelps wrote: Apologies, old sport. I meant in an allegorical sense. I'm pretty sure the Klingons were supposed to be the Soviet Union.

Maybe, maybe not. That's the thing about allegories. The Soviet Union was the big opponent of the west during the Cold War. So while your answer is not wrong, I don't feel there is a 1:1 relationship with the different opponents in the series. "Balance of Terror" is The Enemy Below set in space, but that doesn't make the Romulans the Nazis in that episode, or any other.

You might argue a good case with episodes like "A Private Little War" in which Kirk even mentions Korea and Vietnam indirectly. However, trying to nail down an allegory so firmly does an injustice to the message being conveyed.

Still, nothing beats a Canadian actor reading the Preamble of the US Constitution ("The Omega Glory") with such flair.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 9:32 AM   
 By:   Justin Boggan   (Member)

That was the things about The Undiscovered Country -- it was meant to sort parallel the real life fall of the USSR and things changing.


Best I can tell, Romulous is an equivalent of China.

Cardassians, based upon the occupation of Bajor and crimes committed, were probably loosely connected to National Socialist Part (Nazi's) Germany.


I think others alien races are simply just filler.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 9:41 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

Jim Phelps wrote: Apologies, old sport. I meant in an allegorical sense. I'm pretty sure the Klingons were supposed to be the Soviet Union.

Maybe, maybe not. That's the thing about allegories. The Soviet Union was the big opponent of the west during the Cold War. So while your answer is not wrong, I don't feel there is a 1:1 relationship with the different opponents in the series. "Balance of Terror" is The Enemy Below set in space, but that doesn't make the Romulans the Nazis in that episode, or any other.

You might argue a good case with episodes like "A Private Little War" in which Kirk even mentions Korea and Vietnam indirectly. However, trying to nail down an allegory so firmly does an injustice to the message being conveyed.

Still, nothing beats a Canadian actor reading the Preamble of the US Constitution ("The Omega Glory") with such flair.


As I've stated before: Shakespeare sounds best in the original Shatner. wink

"Balance of Terror" is fairly early in the series, is it not? A chunk of the audience watching ST circa 1966-67 would have lived through WWII though I suppose anyone watching would have recognized the submarine duel parallel. Perhaps the Klingons-as-Soviets emerged later, or the allegory itself is a nebulous thing in that it serves whatever point about the 1960s geopolitical situation it is trying to make at any given time.

As often as the Romulans appeared in the post-TOS era, I always felt they were under utilized and that a lot more could have been done with them and that the Cardassians (tee hee!) took away valuable screen time that should have belonged to the Romulans. I see the Romulans as a stand in for Red China. Perhaps nowadays some viewers might see them as North Korea to Vulcan's South Korea.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 9:47 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

A Star Trek TOS question:

Which "real-life" Earth nations, if any, do the Klingons, Romulans, Andorians, etc. represent?

Thanks in advance.


They're not from Earth. Unless they attacked and occupy areas of the planet, (which I never heard of) it would be none.


Apologies, old sport. I meant in an allegorical sense. I'm pretty sure the Klingons were supposed to be the Soviet Union.


Went over my head. LOL Thanks for clarifying.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 10:18 AM   
 By:   Metryq   (Member)

Which alien opponent they used from week to week may have depended on the budget for pointed ears and the like. (Klingons didn't have bumpy foreheads back then.)

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 10:22 AM   
 By:   Justin Boggan   (Member)

Which alien opponent they used from week to week may have depended on the budget for pointed ears and the like. (Klingons didn't have bumpy foreheads back then.)

Until "Enterprise" decided they did. A sin "Star Trek: Discovery" is repeating.

Even the Deep Space Nine episode "Trials and Tribbulations" had the decency to allow Klingons to be shown in the old TOS footage as they were and give us at least a throw away line from Worf when asked about it (by O'Brien, I think): "We do not speak about it with outsiders."

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 2:12 PM   
 By:   Metryq   (Member)

Wait until the "Lucasing" catches up with later Trek episodes. "Trials and Tribble-ations" will be retconned to feature the horseshoe crab foreheads motion tracked in by the digital makeup department. Old copies of the episode will become collector's items, selling for ridiculous amounts of money on eBay, and the "We do not talk of it with outsiders" clip will become a popular ring tone on otaku smartphones.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2017 - 2:23 PM   
 By:   Justin Boggan   (Member)

But only if all phasers are replaced with hand communicators.

 
 Posted:   Sep 15, 2017 - 4:46 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

It always bothered me the script for Star Trek: TMP went with the fictional Voyager 6. Shouldn't they re-dub it Voyager 1 or 2? The Voyager 6 line always takes me out of the film. I don't understand why they did that to beginning with. Obviously there was never going to be a Voyager 3 much less 6.

 
 
 Posted:   Sep 15, 2017 - 6:09 PM   
 By:   Joe E.   (Member)

Which alien opponent they used from week to week may have depended on the budget for pointed ears and the like. (Klingons didn't have bumpy foreheads back then.)

Until "Enterprise" decided they did. A sin "Star Trek: Discovery" is repeating.

Even the Deep Space Nine episode "Trials and Tribbulations" had the decency to allow Klingons to be shown in the old TOS footage as they were and give us at least a throw away line from Worf when asked about it (by O'Brien, I think): "We do not speak about it with outsiders."


Wait until the "Lucasing" catches up with later Trek episodes. "Trials and Tribble-ations" will be retconned to feature the horseshoe crab foreheads motion tracked in by the digital makeup department. Old copies of the episode will become collector's items, selling for ridiculous amounts of money on eBay, and the "We do not talk of it with outsiders" clip will become a popular ring tone on otaku smartphones.

Nah. There's a multi-episode arc in Enterprise that actually explains exactly what happened, and how the Klingons go from their now-familiar ridged look to the smooth-headed, essentially human look seen in TOS.

 
 Posted:   Sep 15, 2017 - 6:44 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

It always bothered me the script for Star Trek: TMP went with the fictional Voyager 6. Shouldn't they re-dub it Voyager 1 or 2? The Voyager 6 line always takes me out of the film. I don't understand why they did that to beginning with. Obviously there was never going to be a Voyager 3 much less 6.

If they used the real Voyager craft they'd have had to pay a licensing fee to NASA. Read that someplace.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.