Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Jan 22, 2018 - 9:37 PM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Hobo With A Shotgun 1/10

Thank You, Jeeves (1935) 3.5/10

Ultraviolet minus-50/10 Probably the worst film ever made with no redeeming qualities. Astonishingly awful.

Cellar Dwellar 1/10

Zombie Nightmare 2/10 or 7/10 if yer laughing at it with a bemused audience

The Kindred 5/10

The Puppet Masters 7.5/10

Gilbert 7/10

No Escape (1993) 7/10

Ruggles of Red Gap (1935) 7/10

Children of the Corn 1/10

Escape To Athena 7.3/10

The Quiller Memorandum 6.8/10

Mortal Kombat 3/10

Mortal Kombat Annhiliation 1/10

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 22, 2018 - 11:08 PM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Thor Ragnarok 7.3/10 Enjoyable but a bit odd and tiresome. SPOILERS.

Established side characters are killed off in an off-hand way and Thor never even asks about them. It's more a comedy with sci-fi elements, even more than Guardians was (a film it is clearly trying to emulate in parts). Thor loses an eye and it doesn't bother him. Odin sort of gets bored of life or something, like Luke Skywalker did, and dies for some reason, turning into CGI fairy dust. Thor and Loki are sad for 5 seconds. The planet is basically destroyed and when you see it happen another character makes a joke. Thor isn't that bothered. Neither was I.

Much like other Marvel films or The Last Jedi the humour seems to be there at the expense of decent storytelling and real emotion. God forbid a serious moment is allowed without shoehorning in a gag, half the time ruining the moment.

It's like any attempt anything approaching real feelings wouldn't work for the gags they want to throw in. It also suffers from the usual super hero stuff of loads of punching without anyone being hurt until the plot needs someone to be hurt. Loads of CGI everywhere but it feels better done than Justice League.

That said, i enjoyed it more than i thought. Jeff Goldblum is always a delight to watch and Cate Blanchett was super slinky and on great form as the villainous Hela.

 
 Posted:   Jan 22, 2018 - 11:46 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

Hickock (2017)
O stars

I stopped watching this turkey after Hemsworth took off his shirt to reveal a shaved and buffed 21st century torso.
Ten minutes in I knew not to continue.

 
 Posted:   Jan 23, 2018 - 12:59 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)


Oh. Is that about his mustache



I reckon.


"...a moustache...a moustache...you just gotta getta moustache..."

 
 Posted:   Jan 23, 2018 - 1:02 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Sicario

i enjoyed it, first newish film ive enjoyed in a while.
7.5 out of ten.

 
 Posted:   Jan 23, 2018 - 7:42 AM   
 By:   Nicolai P. Zwar   (Member)

Trumbo (USA 2015, Jay Roach) 6/10

OK movie about famed screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, who gets blacklisted because of HUAC pressure and turns to writing B-Fare for a low budget producer, wins an Academy Award he can't accept, and gets finally vindicated writing movies for Kirk Douglas and Otto Preminger. Some funny scenes and some flashy Hollywood background are at times entertaining, but can't hide the fact that the movie is out of its depth; one can't help but sense that there could have been a larger, richer story to be told. Most of the movie's characters remain pretty two dimensional. Though Helen Mirren is deliciously spiteful as Hedda Hopper, the show stealing performance is the comparatively small part by John Goodman as Frank King (which of course reminds one of his similar role as Lawrence Woolsey in Matinée).

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 23, 2018 - 8:46 PM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Mother! 1.5/10 Good acting, Jennifer Lawrence is especially good, and great advertising to generate interest for something this mediocre and dull, but there's nothing much to the film and only one "shock" moment that everyone i watched it with saw coming a mile off. Never really that interesting to watch, which was a problem. Like a poor Twilight Zone episode strung out 4 times too long. Pap.

 
 Posted:   Jan 24, 2018 - 9:54 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

A United Kingdom (2017) 8/10
A delightful drama telling a story many people are unfamiliar with. I primarily watched it for the lovely soundtrack that I fell in love with after a few listens. The story is inspiring and well-done, showing us a powerful fight against injustice and imperialism.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2018 - 1:18 AM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

War Machine 3.5/10 Bit of a dull slog and heavy-handed. Lots of famous people in bit parts so they probably thought the story was "worthy" or something. Brad Pitt is okay and at least a bit fun as a cartoonish character. The music was pretty nice now and again, sort of dreamlike.

 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2018 - 7:17 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Battle for moscow
2016. Russian made with eng subtitles.
Realistic russian front 1941-set ww2 film. First half establishes the quirky characters among a rag tag red army rifle platoon, expecting a german panzer attack and being short of food, weapons, ammunition and equipment, digging in, knowing they face tanks and a grim future. Second half comes the attacks, and what terrific action as this outnumbered group start destroying tanks with every means available to them, from field guns, armour-piercing rifles and home-made molotovs. The panzers looked real to me so dunno if they were part cgi, merely plated over cars or genuinely preserved originals.

I'd go 7 out of ten. Recommend to anyone who likes Ww2 movies, made airfix models and likes their tanks with realism.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2018 - 8:56 AM   
 By:   Tall Guy   (Member)

Battle for moscow
I'd go 7 out of ten. Recommend to anyone who likes Ww2 movies, made airfix models and likes their tanks with realism.



Watched this yesterday and would agree with your assessment in all respects. Did you notice it was crowd-funded? Actually thought of you at the beginning when one of the soldiers was being criticised for his levity, and another said that was just his way and that he’d even joke under fire.

 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2018 - 9:31 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Yes i nearly mentioned that. It said something like This film has been made possible because of 1,846 citizens funded it. Something like that. Bit like a CD kickstarter i guess!!

There was a whiff of soviet propaganda, especially with the ending, but they made fun of this earlier in the film with exaggerrated stories being read out. - and mocked - from their morale-boosting pamplets.

Yes i saw the guy you mean, TG - im not sure if being crushed under panzer wheels was imminent that cracking gags would be high on my agenda. Going to the latrine might be!

There was one scene very realistic when the panzer rolled over the foxholes/trenches, then stopped, reversed and ground down on the earth to crush soldiers crouching below - a common tactic used by tank drivers on the russian front. It may well date back to the rudimentary tanks in the trenches of WWI but it was certainly a trick used when the enemy was dug in.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2018 - 9:59 AM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Bill, did you ever see the German Stalingrad film from the 80s? They show a German being squished by a Soviet tank in the very way you describe. It's not graphic but the raspberry ripple effect in the snow after it happened was horrible enough.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2018 - 10:01 AM   
 By:   Tall Guy   (Member)

It was more like 30-odd thousand people that funded it! You can read up about the actuality by googling Panfilov’s 28. It seems that six of them survived, contrary to the much better legend that they all died in the defence of the Motherland, and one of them even surrendered to the Germans, joined their police force and was arrested by the Soviets in 1947 on charges of high treason. I reckon that was you, pal!

Xebec - I think I remember that but this film was rated 12!

 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2018 - 10:22 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Sorry xeb i dont believe i did see that one.
You may be right about the volume of producers in that film TG.
I must admit the statues by the railway made me think if i went to moscow id wanna check out paniflavs 28.
But given wild horses couldnt drag me there for the world cup i guess its a bucket-list item i can file under No chance!

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 26, 2018 - 3:05 PM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Green Zone 7.7/10 Matt Damon on good form, good fast-paced action, a bit too much shaky-cam but i enjoyed it. Solid.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2018 - 12:01 AM   
 By:   The Wanderer   (Member)

Bedknobs and Broomsticks 8.4/10 Great fun and mad as fish.

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2018 - 7:40 AM   
 By:   DeputyRiley   (Member)

Green Zone 7.7/10 Matt Damon on good form, good fast-paced action, a bit too much shaky-cam but i enjoyed it. Solid.

Yeah I thought it was great. Jason Isaacs, Greg Kinnear, Amy Ryan were all great supporting actors. The movie felt different, fresh, and exciting. The final chase was killer. Having said all that, it was also quite smart, not just war/action.

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2018 - 7:46 AM   
 By:   DeputyRiley   (Member)

Hey Mr. Marshall, that movie Into the Forest that we talked about before (and with Joan H. too) has left such a lasting impression on me I've ordered the book and will begin reading it soon. I remembered you mentioning that you read it and how much you enjoyed it. Did you ever see the movie? I'm going to probably watch that again soon too.



 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2018 - 7:54 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)



Is there a low-sodium version of this film we can watch?

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.