Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Feb 18, 2019 - 5:28 AM   
 By:   Tall Guy   (Member)

RoGoPaG -
6/10 for Rosselini’s segment
7/10 for Godard’s segment
10/10 for Pasolini’s segment
8/10 for Gregoretti’s segment

Four stories allegorically illustrating the start of the end of the world. Rossellini has a beautiful Italian air hostess harassed by an American salesman attracted by her innocence and chastity. Godard’s main character finds that post-apocalyptic Paris is the same as before, but with subtle alterations to attitude. Pasolini shows the hypocrisy of filming a rich technicolour version of the death of Christ in a poor monochrome society. Gregoretti’s family of consumers find the strength to resist temptation while a commentary on refining consumerism overshadows them.

Music by Carlo Rustichelli which works like gangbusters in the film but would probably be mystifying away from it.

 
 Posted:   Feb 18, 2019 - 3:06 PM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

John Wick (2014) ... 2/10

I didn't know what to expect and as time passed the story did not develop in the way I'd assumed ... actually: the story did not develop ... FULL STOP. Once we'd seen the first shoot out (in JW's house) it was as if the film was stuck in a loop because that's all that kept happening.

The story, for what there was, appeared to be a cross between Mel Gibson's Payback (1999) and Tom Hanks' Road to Perdition (2002) but somewhere in the mix they left out all of the characterisation, humour, humanity ... and entertainment.

Oh, and the music score was awful.

And to think there's a sequel - unbelievable!
Mitch

 
 Posted:   Feb 18, 2019 - 7:13 PM   
 By:   Mr. Jack   (Member)

John Wick (2014) ... 2/10

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 18, 2019 - 10:12 PM   
 By:   Tall Guy   (Member)

John Wick (2014) ... 2/10

I didn't know what to expect and as time passed the story did not develop in the way I'd assumed ... actually: the story did not develop ... FULL STOP. Once we'd seen the first shoot out (in JW's house) it was as if the film was stuck in a loop because that's all that kept happening.

The story, for what there was, appeared to be a cross between Mel Gibson's Payback (1999) and Tom Hanks' Road to Perdition (2002) but somewhere in the mix they left out all of the characterisation, humour, humanity ... and entertainment.

Oh, and the music score was awful.

And to think there's a sequel - unbelievable!
Mitch



Sorry you found this out the hard way, Mitch. I’ve watched the first two films and dismissed them on these pages as being thoroughly valueless. Keane shoots many people in the head. Big deal!

 
 Posted:   Feb 19, 2019 - 2:04 AM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

John Wick (2014) Sorry you found this out the hard way, Mitch. I’ve watched the first two films and dismissed them on these pages as being thoroughly valueless. Keane shoots many people in the head. Big deal!

What? You watched the sequel even though you'd see this ... ? Brave man!

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 19, 2019 - 5:18 AM   
 By:   Tall Guy   (Member)

John Wick (2014) Sorry you found this out the hard way, Mitch. I’ve watched the first two films and dismissed them on these pages as being thoroughly valueless. Keane shoots many people in the head. Big deal!

What? You watched the sequel even though you'd see this ... ? Brave man!



big grin I couldn't believe the second one could be as bad - but it was. I have a thing about giving additional chances of redemption.

That's also why I don't have anyone on ignore. No, not even - now you didn't really expect me to name anyone, did you, or maybe you did!

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 20, 2019 - 12:09 PM   
 By:   The Wanderer   (Member)

John Wick (2014) Sorry you found this out the hard way, Mitch. I’ve watched the first two films and dismissed them on these pages as being thoroughly valueless. Keane shoots many people in the head. Big deal!

What? You watched the sequel even though you'd see this ... ? Brave man!



big grin I couldn't believe the second one could be as bad - but it was. I have a thing about giving additional chances of redemption.

That's also why I don't have anyone on ignore. No, not even - now you didn't really expect me to name anyone, did you, or maybe you did!


I went to the pictures to watch John Wick 2 because my friend wanted to go watch it but not on their Tod. I liked the first well enough, which is surprising, as it's usually the kind of film i have no time for.

John Wick 2 was garbage from beginning to end. It looked like shite and was as fun as watching someone play a shoot-em-up computer game. Actually, it was less fun than that. It was utter shite.

Now, if it was directed by an italian chap, TG would have been all over it with his 8 and 9 ratings.

 
 Posted:   Feb 20, 2019 - 1:29 PM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)


That's also why I don't have anyone on ignore. No, not even - now you didn't really expect me to name anyone, did you, or maybe you did!


Oh i wouldve!!! big grin

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 21, 2019 - 1:07 AM   
 By:   Rameau   (Member)

John Wick (2014) ... 2/10

I didn't know what to expect and as time passed the story did not develop in the way I'd assumed ... actually: the story did not develop ... FULL STOP. Once we'd seen the first shoot out (in JW's house) it was as if the film was stuck in a loop because that's all that kept happening.

The story, for what there was, appeared to be a cross between Mel Gibson's Payback (1999) and Tom Hanks' Road to Perdition (2002) but somewhere in the mix they left out all of the characterisation, humour, humanity ... and entertainment.

Oh, and the music score was awful.

And to think there's a sequel - unbelievable!
Mitch


But they...killed his dog!

I quite enjoyed them in a guilty pleasure kind of way. There's a third one coming out in May, rumour has it that he shoots a lot of people in the head. Sorry, I should have put a spoiler on that.

 
 Posted:   Feb 21, 2019 - 2:18 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

"....rumour has it that he shoots a lot of people in the head. Sorry, I should have put a spoiler on that..."

Damn cinemascope you have utterly destroyed my enjoyment of the 3rd film now! wink ha ha

 
 Posted:   Feb 21, 2019 - 6:20 AM   
 By:   Adventures of Jarre Jarre   (Member)

  • "....rumour has it that he shoots a lot of people in the head."

    Every damn night? ON THE TELEPHONE???

  •  
     
     Posted:   Feb 22, 2019 - 7:36 PM   
     By:   Xebec   (Member)

    Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter
    1.5/10

     
     Posted:   Feb 22, 2019 - 10:24 PM   
     By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

    THE LAST MOVIE
    2-10

    Yet another "movie I always wanted to see"AND wish I had not.
    frown
    brm


    p.s.does anybody think
    really think Dennis Hopper is a good actor?

     
     
     Posted:   Feb 22, 2019 - 11:35 PM   
     By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

    Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter
    1.5/10



    Basically a silly film, but it had great 3-D during the ending railroad sequence.

     
     
     Posted:   Feb 23, 2019 - 1:26 AM   
     By:   Tall Guy   (Member)

    Now, if it was directed by an italian chap, TG would have been all over it with his 8 and 9 ratings.


    Or Spanish, or Japanese, or Swedish....

    In which case it might have had some DEPTH, or some LAYERS, or even some MEANING. And there are also some Hollywood directors who would have given it a third dimension.

    (And yes I know you were taking the mickey)

     
     
     Posted:   Feb 23, 2019 - 1:50 PM   
     By:   The Wanderer   (Member)

    Now, if it was directed by an italian chap, TG would have been all over it with his 8 and 9 ratings.


    Or Spanish, or Japanese, or Swedish....

    In which case it might have had some DEPTH, or some LAYERS, or even some MEANING. And there are also some Hollywood directors who would have given it a third dimension.

    (And yes I know you were taking the mickey)


    I don't know if you like football, but you'd have loved a manager called Allardyci.

     
     
     Posted:   Feb 24, 2019 - 4:01 PM   
     By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

    ALITA: BATTLE ANGEL (2019) - 7/10

    Rosa Salazar plays "Alita," a deactivated female cyborg who is revived by "Dr. Dyson Ido" (Christoph Waltz), but cannot remember anything of her past life. She goes on a quest to find out who she is. As you might expect from something co-produced and co-written by James Cameron, CGI is the order of the day, and it is spectacularly detailed. The main action set pieces consist of cyborg-on-cyborg combat, and except for a few shots during a couple of "motorball" sporting tournaments, the action is easy to follow. ("Motorball" is pretty much a cyborg version of "Rollerball.")

    This is a fairly decent start to what I'm sure the film-makers hope will be a franchise. As such, it needs to spend a lot of time setting up its world of the terrestrial "Iron City" and "Zalem," the city hovering in the sky holding society’s upper class over the heads of the poor below. Alita also has various flashbacks, as her past comes into focus. There seem to be plenty of directions for subsequent films to go, since the world of Zalem is scarcely seen during this film, except for its prime villain, who for reasons yet to be revealed desires the destruction of Alita.

     
     Posted:   Feb 24, 2019 - 4:58 PM   
     By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

    TRANSPORTER REFUELLED
    2015
    So bad it hasnt even got jason statham in it!
    Action nonsense. Couple heists quite slick but car chases and fight scenes had that false choeography that looks like dance steps!
    6 out of 10.

     
     Posted:   Feb 24, 2019 - 10:40 PM   
     By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

    BLACKKKLANSMAN
    7-10

    I have to laugh at the , predictable, complaints of "historical inaccuracy'!
    Director Lee directs (and writes)in a highly stylized , personal, style that lets the audience know he is not making a gritty documentary of a real life event. If you don't get that, don't blame the filmmakers.
    (just one example: all the girls at the rally have huge Afros and are gorgeous!)

    An off-beat approach to the subject that works just fine!

     
     Posted:   Feb 25, 2019 - 5:18 AM   
     By:   Nicolai P. Zwar   (Member)

    Sin City (USA 2005, Robert Rodriquez/Frank Miller) 6/10
    Stylish and slavishly faithful adaptation of Frank Miller's collection of graphic novelettes (which describes it more correctly than "graphic novel", I'd day). The movie is certainly interesting and captures the look and style of Miller's comic book -- er, well, -- to the letter (and to the graphic imagery). Perhaps too slavishly, because what works great in a panel of a comic book seems excessively violent in live action scenes. Wisely, the style of the picture tones down the violence (blood at times is white, some of it is in silhouette... still, this ain't no Archie comic book).

    Also, since the mind is allowed to linger over panels of a comic book, but the film keeps moving along at a zipping speed, the characters betray their comic book origin and feel more one dimensional, whereas ironically they seemed more "fleshed out" when they were confined to the black ink of the comic book page.

    If you can stomach the violence, it's still worth seeing for the impressive visuals, which really nail the tone of Frank Miller's (who co-directed) comic book, and some great performances, particularly an over-the-top Mickey Rourke as a tough street thug determined to avenge the death of a prostitute, and an unassuming, quiet Elijah Wood as your ultra-creepy next door serial killer.

     
    You must log in or register to post.
      Go to page:    
    © 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
    Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.