I do have a lot of issues hearing dialogue though.
Lol. Maybe Sol was thinking of the old Maine chestnut, 'You can't get there from here." Although every word is capitalized so maybe he's pitching a movie title which has an intentional misspelling like "The Pursuit of Happyness." But then, I think a better title would be "The Unbearable Lightness of Hereing."
I'm using the MV defense of "Not enough characters allowed in the subject line".
I do have a lot of issues hearing dialogue though.
Lol. Maybe Sol was thinking of the old Maine chestnut, 'You can't get there from here." Although every word is capitalized so maybe he's pitching a movie title which has an intentional misspelling like "The Pursuit of Happyness." But then, I think a better title would be "The Unbearable Lightness of Hereing."
I'm using the MV defense of "Not enough characters allowed in the subject line".
But this is a simple spelling error...and might I remind you, he ducked your question and never did explain that "oop" title.
I think it's probably because about 95% of films has utter shit dialogue. Quotable dialogue like the abundance of golddust from 60s n 70s films is ...er a thing of past. Lol
I think it's probably because about 95% of films has utter shit dialogue. Quotable dialogue like the abundance of golddust from 60s n 70s films is ...er a thing of past. Lol
If people can't be bothered to fix a typo in their topic title, why should move makers care if you can hear the dialog. Like Stephen Woolston with a title post about "Unversal Music releases" and preferred to "double down" by using that incorrect spelling within his post. Kind of stupid.
Geez, how juvenile are you? Must you always play the gotcha game or take personal jabs? Grow up.
As mentioned in the video, many actors are mumblers nowadays and haven't been trained to enunciate their speech. If one can't understand what someone's saying in real time, how can you expect a sound editor to create an intelligible result without looping? Garbage in....garbage out.
If people can't be bothered to fix a typo in their topic title, why should move makers care if you can hear the dialog. Like Stephen Woolston with a title post about "Unversal Music releases" and preferred to "double down" by using that incorrect spelling within his post. Kind of stupid.
Geez, how juvenile are you? Must you always play the gotcha game or take personal jabs? Grow up.
Considering what most of us write here, I don't see how you can seriously take umbrage to the point of name calling. There's no realistic comparison to our posts and what film makers do, so I thought it was obvious I was joking, or making explicit what our jokes were about. I assume you left the typo as a joke. If I was making a personal jab, it was about Woolston since I assume he wanted his topic to be taken seriously. Sorry for offending you.
I appreciate that. My apologies in return if I took your comments the wrong way.
As mentioned in the video, many actors are mumblers nowadays and haven't been trained to enunciate their speech. If one can't understand what someone's saying in real time, how can you expect a sound editor to create an intelligible result without looping? Garbage in....garbage out.
Totally true. One main difference according to the video was studios don't want to spend the money re-recording lines in the studio anymore. Which is really weird since they spend hundreds of millions of dollars on re-shoots.
