Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2020 - 4:19 PM   
 By:   dragon53   (Member)

LINK: https://nerdist.com/article/pentagon-identified-ufos/

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2020 - 4:45 PM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

LINK: https://nerdist.com/article/pentagon-identified-ufos/

The New York Times recently spoke with Davis, who currently works for the defense contractor, Aerospace Corporation. In the article, which comes via Boing Boing, Davis says that some of the materials taken from found UFOs have so far been unidentifiable.

Boing Boing? Then it must be true!

Davis claims even though the DoD says the program’s been shut down, it hasn’t. And he’s still working for it. He also says that he has recently given briefings to Pentagon officials regarding "off-world vehicles not made on this earth."

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2020 - 6:15 PM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)

Combined with the US Navy's recent releases, I hope this promising trend continues. Reasonable **honest** disclosure is required.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2020 - 6:19 PM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

"Davis says that some of the materials taken from found UFOs have so far been unidentifiable."

So they can't even identify the flying object - never mind the materials found on it. Probably in the wrong business.

(Of course, it's all total bollocks.)

Wait, if only some of the materials are unidentifiable, why isn't he telling us about the bits that they could identify?

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2020 - 6:31 PM   
 By:   Moonlit   (Member)

Wait, if only some of the materials are unidentifiable, why isn't he telling us about the bits that they could identify?

.....oh yeah, kinda an important point to leave out. roll eyes

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2020 - 6:36 PM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

Wait, if only some of the materials are unidentifiable, why isn't he telling us about the bits that they could identify?

Probably because they were from manmade unidentified flying objects (mentioned in the Harry Reid blurb) and therefore irrelevant to the interview with this "consultant astrophysicist" about alien proofs.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2020 - 8:29 PM   
 By:   solium   (Member)

Nothing to see here. Nothing new, just same old stories. Its propaganda so they can justify investing billions into the Space Force. Its nothing more than another handout to the industrial war complex.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 12:17 AM   
 By:   Rameau   (Member)

"Davis says that some of the materials taken from found UFOs have so far been unidentifiable."

I can't identify this object, it must be extraterrestrial.

It's a Coke bottle sir.

Stow that talk, soldier.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 1:31 AM   
 By:   Jehannum   (Member)

YouTuber Thunderf00t's recent videos debunking the UFO footage were a real eye-opener for me as to how gullible people can be when dodgy data seems to fit their pet narratives. This applies to not only your everyday conspiracy chumps but to highly-qualified people.

This is the first of 3 videos on the subject and is definitely worth a watch (unless you want alien visitors to be real so much you will not accept the obvious - in that case give it a miss).


 
 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 3:28 AM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Hah. Thanks, Jeh. Tucker Carlson, whoever he is, seems thick as a Flat Earther.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 7:04 AM   
 By:   solium   (Member)

"Davis says that some of the materials taken from found UFOs have so far been unidentifiable."

I can't identify this object, it must be extraterrestrial.

It's a Coke bottle sir.

Stow that talk, soldier.


LOL! Is that a Gods Must Be Crazy joke?

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 7:07 AM   
 By:   solium   (Member)

Hah. Thanks, Jeh. Tucker Carlson, whoever he is, seems thick as a Flat Earther.

Besides all the conspiracy theorists, nut jobs and gullible ppl, even professionals with good intentions can get things wrong. One needs irrefutable evidence in order to make a claim.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 7:43 AM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)


Besides all the conspiracy theorists, nut jobs and gullible ppl, even professionals with good intentions can get things wrong. One needs irrefutable evidence in order to make a claim.


I don't think Albert Einstein possessed irrefutable evidence to present his theory of relativity.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 7:58 AM   
 By:   Grecchus   (Member)

"Einstein was probably one of them." fairly heavy southern accent must be applied

Team leader, Close Encounters Of The Third Kind.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 8:24 AM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)


Besides all the conspiracy theorists, nut jobs and gullible ppl, even professionals with good intentions can get things wrong. One needs irrefutable evidence in order to make a claim.


I don't think Albert Einstein possessed irrefutable evidence to present his theory of relativity.


A mathematical proof is not the same as inferring that ETs must have made unidentifiable material. A biological analogy involving germs might be a better analogy. Their existence was inferred as the cause for illness (as opposed to a troll living in your stomach).

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 9:17 AM   
 By:   solium   (Member)


Besides all the conspiracy theorists, nut jobs and gullible ppl, even professionals with good intentions can get things wrong. One needs irrefutable evidence in order to make a claim.


I don't think Albert Einstein possessed irrefutable evidence to present his theory of relativity.


Einstein presented theories, most of which have been proven fact through scientific observations and pier review. About the only time he was wrong was when he second guessed himself.

Alien conspiracists make the same dodgy claims with nothing but horror stories, fuzzy pictures and grainy videos. Never once have they ever produced an alien body or alien tin foil.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 9:23 AM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)


Besides all the conspiracy theorists, nut jobs and gullible ppl, even professionals with good intentions can get things wrong. One needs irrefutable evidence in order to make a claim.


I don't think Albert Einstein possessed irrefutable evidence to present his theory of relativity.


A mathematical proof is not the same as inferring that ETs must have made unidentifiable material. A biological analogy involving germs might be a better analogy. Their existence was inferred as the cause for illness (as opposed to a troll living in your stomach).


There's a Troll living in my stomach?!?

BLEAAAAAAA-HAH-HAH-HAAAAAAA!!!

(crazed terror scream)

Actually, that's kind of cool. Can I temporarily release him to conduct mayhem upon others? Just asking.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 9:25 AM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)


Besides all the conspiracy theorists, nut jobs and gullible ppl, even professionals with good intentions can get things wrong. One needs irrefutable evidence in order to make a claim.


I don't think Albert Einstein possessed irrefutable evidence to present his theory of relativity.


Einstein presented theories, most of which have been proven fact through scientific observations and pier review. About the only time he was wrong was when he second guessed himself.

Alien conspiracists make the same dodgy claims with nothing but horror stories, fuzzy pictures and grainy videos. Never once have they ever produced an alien body or alien tin foil.


Radar records, flight recordings. Note recent official US Navy fighter pilot bits.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 9:34 AM   
 By:   solium   (Member)


Besides all the conspiracy theorists, nut jobs and gullible ppl, even professionals with good intentions can get things wrong. One needs irrefutable evidence in order to make a claim.


I don't think Albert Einstein possessed irrefutable evidence to present his theory of relativity.


Einstein presented theories, most of which have been proven fact through scientific observations and pier review. About the only time he was wrong was when he second guessed himself.

Alien conspiracists make the same dodgy claims with nothing but horror stories, fuzzy pictures and grainy videos. Never once have they ever produced an alien body or alien tin foil.


Radar records, flight recordings. Note recent official US Navy fighter pilot bits.


Its the same ambiguous "evidence" which can be interpreted to mean anything. Show me an alien spaceship, an alien body , alien technology, something. We have satellites that can read your license plate. We can detect the composition of far away planets with light. We can take pictures of planets orbiting other star systems. It's not the 50's anymore. Everyone has an HD 4K camera in their pocket. I can't imagine what technology the government really has for surveillance. All this yet still no clear picture of an alien spacecraft.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2020 - 11:12 AM   
 By:   Last Child   (Member)

A mathematical proof is not the same as inferring that ETs must have made unidentifiable material. A biological analogy involving germs might be a better analogy. Their existence was inferred as the cause for illness (as opposed to a troll living in your stomach).

There's a Troll living in my stomach?!?

BLEAAAAAAA-HAH-HAH-HAAAAAAA!!!


It was a Medieval theory, popularized in an SNL skit. To make an additional point, it shows how people typically look for an intelligence that causes events (like claiming Zeus throws lightning bolts). So it's prudent to be skeptical.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2020 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved...