Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 10:59 AM   
 By:   edwzoomom   (Member)

We finally received a return to office plan with dates and details. Interestingly enough, there is no reference to mask requirements, vaccination requirements and no offer to remain working from home on a permanent basis. That said, there was an encouragement to get vaccinated in order to assist in a smooth transition.

Already there are employee comments on both sides of the vaccine issue - some questioning the decision not to return during an elevated risk due to an uptick in case and others praising the company for no vaccine/mask mandate. This is not what I expected from a company that has been in the forefront for the positive way they have handled the concerns of employees and clients during this pandemic. I think it will be an evolving situation.


This combo, no vacc required and no mask required, it is just crazy. There will be no end in sight for this thing. And some people think that this virus will just go away. It will be here forever.


It frankly shocks me. This is one of the most diverse, pro-employee Fortune 500 companies out there. It's lazy and pretty shocking to all of us who have placed our trust in them.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 11:12 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

We finally received a return to office plan with dates and details. Interestingly enough, there is no reference to mask requirements, vaccination requirements and no offer to remain working from home on a permanent basis. That said, there was an encouragement to get vaccinated in order to assist in a smooth transition.

Already there are employee comments on both sides of the vaccine issue - some questioning the decision not to return during an elevated risk due to an uptick in case and others praising the company for no vaccine/mask mandate. This is not what I expected from a company that has been in the forefront for the positive way they have handled the concerns of employees and clients during this pandemic. I think it will be an evolving situation.


This combo, no vacc required and no mask required, it is just crazy. There will be no end in sight for this thing. And some people think that this virus will just go away. It will be here forever.


It frankly shocks me. This is one of the most diverse, pro-employee Fortune 500 companies out there. It's lazy and pretty shocking to all of us who have placed our trust in them.


Like a lot of workplaces yours is being run like Lord of the Flies, but considering how large they are, that makes very little sense.

John McMasters office is doing it the correct way

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 11:39 AM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

It frankly shocks me. This is one of the most diverse, pro-employee Fortune 500 companies out there. It's lazy and pretty shocking to all of us who have placed our trust in them.


I get a very strong sense that if the vax protocols are being left up to the discretion of the individual companies, then that unfortunately also means it's left up to the whims of whatever agenda may be in the minds of the leaders of those companies.
And it the lowly employees raise a ruckus with an anti-vax CEO (or equivalent of)... well... they'll probably be shown the door.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 12:04 PM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

I get a very strong sense that if the vax protocols are being left up to the discretion of the individual companies, then that unfortunately also means it's left up to the whims of whatever agenda may be in the minds of the leaders of those companies. And it the lowly employees raise a ruckus with an anti-vax CEO (or equivalent of)... well... they'll probably be shown the door.

Shareholders and social media may have a bigger say than a corporate officer. It depends on the stink made, however.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 12:15 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Shareholders and social media may have a bigger say than a corporate officer. It depends on the stink made, however.


Oh, absolutely.
That's what I meant by "CEO (or equivalent of)".
What a mess...
And it gets even more muddy when one considers how impermanent some people in those positions can be.
One minute you have pro-vax people in charge, a month later the opposite come walking in--or vice versa.
The employees can get whiplash from trying to keep up with the changes.

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 12:24 PM   
 By:   Advise & Consent   (Member)

Shareholders and social media may have a bigger say than a corporate officer. It depends on the stink made, however.


Oh, absolutely.
That's what I meant by "CEO (or equivalent of)".
What a mess...
And it gets even more muddy when one considers how impermanent some people in those positions can be.
One minute you have pro-vax people in charge, a month later the opposite come walking in--or vice versa.
The employees can get whiplash from trying to keep up with the changes.


@ Mr. Octoberman: do you have any specific examples?

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 12:32 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

@ Mr. Octoberman: do you have any specific examples?


No, not particularly.
I wish I did, but at the same time, I'm glad I don't.
But the world of corporate executives is both fast-paced and cutthroat, so it's well within the realm of possibility.
That's why I usually load my comments with qualifiers signifying what may or may NOT come to pass.

I think it also largely depend on how much or how little corporate suits can manage to keep such things out of the news.
We might only hear about such things through the dogged determination of a snoopy reporter, or actual whistleblowers.
When you think about it, it's not too hard to imagine some companies wanting employees to sign NDA's about such things.
It's pretty uncomfortable to even ponder.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 2:16 PM   
 By:   henry   (Member)

Solium, please stay safe my friend, I do worry about you!smile

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 4:48 PM   
 By:   Sir David of Garland   (Member)

Update- Three of my co-workers tested positive for Covid. frown mad

Some places seem fine, Solly reports this. Has the world changed forever?

 
 Posted:   Jul 27, 2021 - 8:03 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Solium, please stay safe my friend, I do worry about you!smile

Thanks buddy, don't know how I've gone this far unscathed. I've worked thru it all so far.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2021 - 10:20 AM   
 By:   Rexor   (Member)

This thread has been fascinating, from the "over-hype" origins, until now. Due to politics and name-calling, I thought everything would disappear. So, I want to thank the moderators for their patience and everyone for contributing. I was able to share some personal anecdotes, vent about occupational issues (during the early phase of the NY/NJ "lockdown"), and read about other people's experiences in the US and other countries.

After Mr. Kendall's threat to remove the thread, I reread some of the earlier post. One post, from Ado (in March 2020) sticks out:

... we can see it is made worse, because even here people are not taking it seriously. The potential real outcome, 600,000 US dead, and many thousands with life long damage to their lungs. Call me buzz kill, whatever, it is not funny. People need to take the science seriously...

It is hard to comprehend that this virus has been attributed to more than 600,000 deaths in the US. :0 It does not feel like this many people have died...

Just out of interest how many people on here are pro mandatory vaccination for everyone who will not have the vaccine (with a few caveats)?

The caveats... If a person had covid, why should she/he have to get a vaccination (and booster shots)? Also, if I had covid, will getting the vaccination and (incessant) booster shots cause any future health effects? I was going to write I am not for mandatory vaccinations, but, I see the quagmire. It almost like in the beginning of the thread where there was a debate over statistics - the death rate, the infection rate, the percentages, etc. Like before, I think we should focus on two numbers, the number of deaths and hospitalizations, but even if we focus on the number of deaths, less than 3000 of the 600,000 death's were for people under 30 years old. I don't want to get caught in the sand, but I can see how younger people might not fear the virus or want to take the (unapproved) vaccines.


...However, one thing I want to ask and have not seen while scrolling through this thread are any specific reasons here as to why some members don't trust the COVID vaccine....

I think it is more than not trusting the vaccine. It's not trusting the business or the government (the CDC). The CDC's marketing campaign promoting an annual flu vaccine and the department's evolving stance on the flu vaccine recommendations (age groups, nasal spray) can be a factor in someone mistrusting the agency. Mistrust could also be occurring because of the way the CDC calculates flu-death's (see article below). Then there is the issue of countries using, accepting, and banning certain flu vaccines.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-cdc-influenza-math-doesnt-add-up-exaggerating-death-toll-to-sell-flu-shots/

If we start to discuss business and mistrust, there is Johnson and Johnson (DuPont, etc). Johnson and Johnson was in the news recently regarding their billion dollar settlement for their role in the opioid crisis and there are the ongoing lawsuits about baby powder. Couple this with the potential ills of the vaccine - allergic reaction, blood clots, GBS, heart issues (and ????), and I could see why a young and healthy person would examine the numbers, roll the dice, and go with Nature (God?).

-Rex

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2021 - 11:10 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

@ rex,

I wish that I had been wrong back then, but, alas, the statistics today are at 611,000 US dead. And almost everyone in the health care community says that even this number is probably a serious undercount. It is also remarkable that 100,000,000 people in this country are eligible for the Covid-19 vaccine, but have not taken it. The only conclusion is that the death count is going to continue to climb, and a lot.

Herein, we have a solid contradiction of the folksy old American self congratulation, "we are grown up, responsible, and free, but we always do the right thing- we are capable of making the right decision" Well, no, pretty much 50% of the nation is not, has not. The politicizing of health care by demonizing mask wearing and taking the vaccine as being some indicator of being somehow "less patriotic" has been aggressive for the past year, and it continues even now. Something is sadly, very very wrong in this country. And I cannot see it getting better anytime soon.

The vaccines are extremely safe and effective.
If you do not want to use the JJ I can understand that

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2021 - 1:11 PM   
 By:   Advise & Consent   (Member)

@ rex,

I wish that I had been wrong back then, but, alas, the statistics today are at 611,000 US dead. And almost everyone in the health care community says that even this number is probably a serious undercount. It is also remarkable that 100,000,000 people in this country are eligible for the Covid-19 vaccine, but have not taken it. The only conclusion is that the death count is going to continue to climb, and a lot.

Herein, we have a solid contradiction of the folksy old American self congratulation, "we are grown up, responsible, and free, but we always do the right thing- we are capable of making the right decision" Well, no, pretty much 50% of the nation is not, has not. The politicizing of health care by demonizing mask wearing and taking the vaccine as being some indicator of being somehow "less patriotic" has been aggressive for the past year, and it continues even now. Something is sadly, very very wrong in this country. And I cannot see it getting better anytime soon.

The vaccines are extremely safe and effective.
If you do not want to use the JJ I can understand that


Do you have any evidence for these wild, scaremongering claims? It must be really depressing being you, cowering, afraid, worrying all the time.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2021 - 1:37 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Do you have any evidence for these wild, scaremongering claims? It must be really depressing being you, cowering, afraid, worrying all the time.


But no one is cowering.
What we are talking about here is provable, verifiable fact--not mere opinion.
Advising caution, using common sense and taking proven preventative measures recommended by the appropriate health agencies is not scaremongering.
I understand the point you are trying to make, but you are going about it the wrong way.
If you think the facts and numbers are wrong, then show how.
Then a more rounded perception can be examined.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2021 - 1:55 PM   
 By:   edwzoomom   (Member)

My organization has instituted a policy that all new hires must be vaccinated. We're working on a policy for mandatory vaccinations for existing staff that will incorporate EEO guidelines. The policies are being sent out through my email under the signature of the senior executives so I'm obviously in the loop. We are a healthcare organization with Federal contracts, plus New York City and State contracts, so the issue may be moot for us.

That's such good news John. Your employer is doing what's best for the employees. Unlike mine who suddenly decided to throw caution out the window. This may backfire on them and I so hope it does.

Edit: By backfire I mean I hope the employees balk at the return to work plan and it impacts the decision in our favor.

 
 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2021 - 4:17 PM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

611,128 deaths

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/covid-cases.html


Pretending it is not real - does not make it not real.
Wishing it to go away, will not make it go away.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2021 - 4:50 PM   
 By:   Advise & Consent   (Member)

611,128 deaths

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/covid-cases.html


Pretending it is not real - does not make it not real.
Wishing it to go away, will not make it go away.


Over 600 000 deaths from heart disease in the US, year in year out. Pretending that this is not real - does not make it not real. Why is the outcry? Why isn't this treated as a "health crisis"?

Wishing it to go away, will not make it go away, nor will cowering behind the moderator, manlet.

 
 Posted:   Jul 28, 2021 - 5:17 PM   
 By:   Lukas Kendall   (Member)


I have been dragged back into this thread for the last time. I am locking it. Don't start it again.

Lukas

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.