|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I actually prefer the top poster more... though the movie sucks! I didn't THINK it sucked when it first came out, but man... I now know what is meant when some people talk a about film "not aging well"!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I find it kind of normal that Marlon Brando and Gene Hackman got first billing over Christopher Reeve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I notice that the tagline changed from describing the film as "the ultimate confrontation" to the more hyperbolic "cosmic battle for world supremacy." (Isn't that a contradiction in terms? Why would a cosmic battle be concerned with supremacy on a single measly world?) That was almost the case in Back to the Future Part II, although "Granted, that's a worse case scenario. The destruction might in fact be very localized, limited to merely our own galaxy." The new Zod and Superman sure made a mess of New York and killed thousands in that atrocity called MAN OF STEEL. I've always believed in this simple credo: If Superman is in trouble... RUN. Don't look, just RUN. We've got... something. I AIN'T SAYIN' WHAT IT IS, just trust me...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, as usual, I am one of the more annoyingly contrary voices: I - LOVE - this film. Even today. The theatrical cut is a wonderful continuation and it was a huge success among my friends back in the day. Some reviewers even preferred it to the original. I didn't, but i still really enjoy it. I really don't like the Donner Cut, but feel a mash up edit of both would make an even better film. I have a preference for the second poster because that's the one I remember most and was on the LP, which I still have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|