Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Mar 2, 2021 - 1:05 AM   
 By:   Hurdy Gurdy   (Member)

Waterloo
1971
"How this ponderous peculiarity was ever billed as a family action film at the time i dont know. I saw this with my mum n dad - never remembered being so bored. Its a spectacle, for sure, and to be admired for its epic scale, but dreary and heavy-going as the mud the battle was fought in. Rod Steiger's over-acting sometimes works in the roles hes in (Duck you sucker hes perfect) but in this even his exaggerrated whispering to himself is irritating. A very confusing battle, too, not very clearly explained"
6 out of 10
-----------------------------------

So, Bill, you call it PONDEROUS, BORING, DREARY, HEAVY-GOING, with Main Role OVER-ACTING and CONFUSING, NOT CLEARLY EXPLAINED BATTLE SCENES...

AND THEN GIVE IT A 6 OUT OF 10 !!!!!

Mitch...Have A Word wink

 
 Posted:   Mar 2, 2021 - 1:15 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

I gave it something for the spectacle and the epic size of it, and it was watchable, just slow and heavy.
I think 6 is fair. 7 and above makes it good.
Below 6 i thought i was being mean.
Ok 5.5.

You watch kev and see what you would give it.

 
 Posted:   Mar 2, 2021 - 1:48 AM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

Waterloo
...
AND THEN GIVE IT A 6 OUT OF 10 !!!!!

Mitch...Have A Word wink


Oh dear, my reputation precedes me smile

I admit that I, too, thought that "6" was high given Bill's descriptive review and it begs the question just how poor does a film have to be for him to give a low rating? I've not see Waterloo (1970) ... though did read Frederick E. Smith's novelisation of the screenplay shortly after the film's release ... so can't comment. I do hope to watch it one day (I managed to record the second half ... twice ... when it was recently broadcast frown)

In summary, Bill thought Waterloo was as entertaining as I did The Good, the Bad and the Ugly ... smile

... runs for cover!

 
 Posted:   Mar 2, 2021 - 2:30 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Its a fkn bad day in fsm when one after the other yer so-called mates put the boot in...and leave it in. frown

Ive already changed it to 5.5. Give us a bleedin break big grin

Bunch of bastards. wink

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 2, 2021 - 2:53 AM   
 By:   Hurdy Gurdy   (Member)

"You watch kev and see what you would give it"
----------------------
Are you Messin!!!
After that (6/10) Review !!! big grin
I wouldn't go near now it if it was titled STAR WARS Ep 10 RISE OF WATERLOO

 
 Posted:   Mar 4, 2021 - 10:54 AM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

The Victors (1963) ... 6-/10

My second viewing although as this is one of those films which has been chopped and re-assembled over time I don't know whether it was the same version. I do know I enjoyed - perhaps that should be appreciated - it more this time. I almost gave up after ten minutes or so but soon afterwards became engrossed in the storyline, not recalling too much.

A big, sprawling war movie ... with a difference: there's hardly any fighting. What we see is the devastation that the fighting brings to the survivors ... the victors of the title. No heroics, no glory ... just survival ... but not for all.

The film is intercut with numerous film reels and many scenes look fake. Having filmed on location, the close-ups are clearly studio bound and this mars the flow. And the cast is less than perfect: with Eli Wallach superb for the first two-thirds of the film, the last third suffers from his absence. George Peppard is very good and takes over for most of the film's remainder but when George [mannequin] Hamilton becomes lead for the last act the film dies. Earlier he had support from his co-stars and even looked good against Michael Callan but he lacked any personality on which to hang the finale.

Many later-to-be-well-known actors fill out the cast and together they tell us what we already know.

Sol Kaplan's score is involving and is more appropriate than the OST album would lead you to believe. However, I felt the use of the melodic theme during a rest period in Sicily was out-of-place and somewhat jarring.
Mitch

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 4, 2021 - 3:26 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

THE ABOMINABLE DR. PHIBES (1971) – 7/10

This campy horror film is set in 1920’s England, where “Dr. Anton Phibes” (Vincent Price), a famous organist, orchestrates a series of grisly murders of 10 doctors and nurses whom he blames for the death of his wife years earlier. "Inspector Trout" (Peter Jeffrey) is always one step behind Phibes, as Trout investigates the deaths of the victims, all of whom are murdered by one of the ten plagues that beset the Pharaoh of Egypt for enslaving the Israelites. Trout reaches the chief surgeon, “Dr. Vesalius” (Joseph Cotton) in time, but can he keep him alive, as Phibes, aided by his female assistant “Vulnavia” (Virginia North) strives to complete his revenge?

I originally saw this film in the theater, and it’s still a fun watch. The film has an art deco look, with great production design, along with a score peppered with songs of the period. The murders are inventive, along with some gruesome touches regarding Phibes himself. It’s a one-of-a-kind horror film (except, of course, for its less successful sequel, 1972’s DR. PHIBES RISES AGAIN!). THE ABOMINABLE DR. PHIBES took in $4.5 million at the U.S. box office, more than enough to prompt the sequel.

The music of the film has gone through many permutations. The original film featured a number of period songs, some of which were sung in the film and others which appeared as instrumentals. Between all of that was an original score by Basil Kirchin. American International Records released a mislabeled “soundtrack” LP that had some of the instrumental songs, none of the score, and replaced the sung songs with versions vocalized by Paul Frees, who impersonated everyone from Ronald Colman to Humphrey Bogart singing the songs (none of whom actually sang the songs in the film). This bastardization of the songs carried forward to the film’s early video releases on VHS and laserdisc, which replaced some of the songs, not with Frees’ versions, but with versions by yet other vocalists. This was rectified by the DVD /Blu-ray releases, which reverted back to the original song-tracks. As for Kirchin’s score, in 2003 it was released by Perseverance Records. The Frees LP remains unreleased on CD.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 4, 2021 - 3:26 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

Vincent Price in THE ABOMINABLE DR. PHIBES

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 4, 2021 - 3:56 PM   
 By:   Rameau   (Member)

Waterloo
1971
"How this ponderous peculiarity was ever billed as a family action film at the time i dont know. I saw this with my mum n dad - never remembered being so bored. Its a spectacle, for sure, and to be admired for its epic scale, but dreary and heavy-going as the mud the battle was fought in. Rod Steiger's over-acting sometimes works in the roles hes in (Duck you sucker hes perfect) but in this even his exaggerrated whispering to himself is irritating. A very confusing battle, too, not very clearly explained"
6 out of 10


I saw it when it opened in London's Leicester Square, I was really looking forward to it...& was really disappointed. Rod Steiger was pretty bad, & as you say, the battle is all over the place, you just don't know what's going on (& then you cease to care). I think it's more of a 3 out of 10.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 5, 2021 - 12:23 AM   
 By:   Rameau   (Member)

Now You See Me (2013) A bunch of super magicians engineer some mega robberies. All done very flashy with lots of style & it's enjoyable, but think about it for more than five seconds or apply any logic to it & it all falls apart.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 5, 2021 - 3:01 AM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)

All done very flashy with lots of style & it's enjoyable, but think about it for more than five seconds or apply any logic to it & it all falls apart.

The best description of Hollywood in ages. big grin

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2021 - 11:55 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

FALL OF A KINGDOM
2019
(Also known as The Rising Hawk apparently)
Perhaps it shouldve been entitled the Lame Duck or the Fall of scriptwriting)

Where do i start with this? A lazy script for naive 12 year olds who have never seen a film. Starts out a kind of West side story in Carpathia, and turns into a warring factions unite against the invading Mongols (kings of the sun plot anyone?). The highlight for me was Alison Doody's incredible cheekbones (remember her Last crusade and a bond film?). Score was utterly bland.

During one of the pathetic "rousing" speeches where the actors and the extras all ended up screaming in approval at the plan to stop the mongol army i was reminded of that Pekinpah story where he kicked back a chair and screamed at RG Armstrong "I dont believe a God****** word youre saying!!!"
Well, thats how i felt. But i didnt kick a chair.

4.5 out of 10, and 1.5 of that is for Doody cheekbones.

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2021 - 9:15 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Raya and the Last Dragon- 3-5

Giving it a fairly generous rating because as kids fodder its fine enough. The character animation for Raya was really superb. Kelly Marie Tran who was a complete bore in Star Wars put in a captivating performance as the voice of Raya. The evil cloud creatures were very cool and the score added a few high lights.

But the positives end there. The story was pretty ridiculous and thin. The basic theme was the same as The Dark Crystal. A magical gem must be healed to bring peace and prosper back to the land. Raya like every other modern day Disney girl is an expert fighter by the age of 10 (?) Raya is betrayed by a new friend and learns to trust no one. We jump ahead six years and 16 (?) year old Raya goes on a quest to find the shattered pieces of the magical gem and mend it so she can bring her father back to life.

The script was full of exhibition as everything had to be explained to us. Raya states at least ten times in the film she doesn’t trust anyone. Just to make sure we get her hang up I guess. Yet she constantly trusts the one person who’s betrayed her the most. The plot is your basic journey to find the MacGuffin(s). Other than The Dark Crystal they seem to borrow the evil cloud creatures from Little Nemo: Adventures in Slumberland. Something no one would pick up unless you’re an animation nerd like me.

The comedy was mostly the same tired stuff you get in animated films and the action sequences are to sped up and cut so fast they were a blur. There really wasn’t a single exciting action sequence in the film. I don’t know how to explain it but the body language for the characters were really annoying to, in that modern Hollywood this is how characters act kinda way.

The other characters are mostly annoying, especially the Dragon lady. Who’s smokers voice and wise cracks made her very annoying for most of the picture. The dragons design didn’t fit with the rest of the film either.
They look like they belong in another animated film and weren’t appealing looking. I won’t describe all the characters but theres also a toddler thief, which made no sense at all. How could a toddler have the mental and physical capabilities to to plan robberies or survive on its own? (with a bunch of monkeys)

Raya learns to trust again by trusting the one person who had betrayed her over and over again. Pretty stupid and a bad lesson for kids. Of course her trust paid off in the end.

Like I said in the beginning its decent enough for kids and they should enjoy the comedy and action. Though again the lessons learned are not wise ones nor earned. This is no Disney classic.

 
 Posted:   Mar 8, 2021 - 7:48 PM   
 By:   Viscount Bark   (Member)

STORMY MONDAY (1988)

This is the movie that really made people sit up and take notice of cinematographer Roger Deakins - and now I see why; the photography is top hole.

This is a noirish Brit crime drama - concerning a grapple between club owner Sting and rapacious American businessman Tommy Lee Jones (100% mustache-twirling villainous here) for the soul of Newcastle. (As Pet Shop Boy Neil Tennant once said, "Newcastle on a Saturday night - terrifying.")

The bruised innocents are a young Sean Bean and Melanie Griffith (looking the best I've ever seen her) hoping to outmaneuver Jones and Sting. There's also an almost buried subplot concerning a rumpled-faced Polish musician and the pretty blonde Polish woman he meets that becomes important by the climax. Jazz music plays a heavy part in this film along with writer-director Mike Figgis' soothing but sinister synths.

Quite heavy-handed in its view of American business (Jones' character is crass and manipulative) and there is some sort of "America Week" going on with a huge Pepsi bottle placed in the center of the town square. Subtle, Figgis.

But the cliches of the basic story are not the thing here. It's the mood, atmosphere, character interactions that matter. Griffith and Bean's first date at midnight is a mellow meeting, evoking a true sense of outside and inside a bar - it has a realness that so many movies lack. (One nice little moment: The bartender lists the Scotch he has in stock in a rhythmic, mellifluous manner without tripping over his tongue. Griffith laughs lightly in appreciation.)

Someone on imdb put it better than I did: "The atmosphere of the movie makes you feel as if you're having a nice evening out on the town, making your way from pub to pub. You can almost taste the beer, and smell the smoke."

Figgis and Deakins' handling of the look and feel of the film truly make this a keeper - even if the plot contrivances and attempts at true noir sometimes fumble.

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 8, 2021 - 9:04 PM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Mark, there are some great images in that film for sure. Decent film, too.

 
 Posted:   Mar 8, 2021 - 9:18 PM   
 By:   Viscount Bark   (Member)

Mark, there are some great images in that film for sure. Decent film, too.

Yes, it has a special flavor. I'm wondering if we have any Newcastle people here at FSM who have seen it.

 
 Posted:   Mar 9, 2021 - 2:03 PM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

Thoroughly Modern Millie (1967) ... 6/10

I don't recall this being broadcast before and was impressed with the glorious picture quality and excellent sound. But several times I came close to stopping ... enough is enough. I stuck with it and am glad I did because there are several great fun sequences, albeit I concluded that the overall film is not as good as the sum of these scenes.

Overlong and a mix of styles don't help but the cast, mostly, are worth watching and the underlying story threads do come to a nice conclusion. IMDb describes it as Comedy, Musical, Romance each being right and wrong. There was only one scene which had me laugh out loud ... otherwise I smiled a lot; there were a few musical numbers but this is no R&H or L&L extravaganza; and the romance is so limited that if you blinked at the wrong times you'd miss the few kisses and clinches.

Julie Andrews is superb and Carol Channing bests her in the musical numbers ... despite her voice! I enjoyed James Fox's performance and John Gavin took the part that Rock Hudson would have portrayed on his day-off a decade earlier. Only Mary Tyler Moore, of the main stars, seemed out-played but was still good in her role.

Elmer Bernstein's score is supplemented by several old standards and the dance sequences are scored by Andre Previn, For the first half I struggled to pick out any noticeable work by the former but happily I think the later part demonstrated his talents as he mimicked (paid tribute to) the scoring of the silents with wonderful pastiche scoring of James Fox and Julie Andrews seeking to out-do Harold Lloyd.

&

Captain Apache (1971) ... no score

I stuck with it through the awful titles and for about 15 minutes .. end of ... no more! Atrocious.

 
 Posted:   Mar 9, 2021 - 2:13 PM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

"Ive got a date...with an april morning"

Did you not know it was fairly awful tosh, mitch?
Shouldve asked me.
Not quite as bad as Bad mans river!

 
 
 Posted:   Mar 9, 2021 - 4:11 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

THE ABSENT-MINDED PROFESSOR (1961) – 7/10

This is the classic Disney comedy-fantasy in which Medfield College’s “Professor Ned Brainard” (Fred MacMurray) invents “flubber,” a gravity-defying substance that bounces higher each time it hits the ground. The film gets off to a raucous start, with Brainard blowing up classrooms and workshops on his way to accidentally inventing the magical substance, all while missing his impending nuptials (for the third time) to the college Dean’s secretary, “Betsy Carlisle” (Nancy Olsen). The first half of the film culminates in a wild laugh-out-loud basketball game full of special effects that took three days to shoot.

After that, the pace slows down, as Brainard gets involved in foiling a scheme by businessman (and chief Medfield financier) “Alonzo Hawk” (Keenan Wynn) to get his hands on the flubber. And when Brainard tries to give his invention to the Government, the Pentagon bureaucracy, the competition between the Services, and Hawk’s conniving all combine to overload the film with plot threads. Still, it’s an enjoyable picture, and MacMurray is perfect in his part.

Also appearing are Tommy Kirk as Hawks’ son, Ed Wynn (Keenan’s father) as a fire chief, and Edward Andrews as the Defense Secretary. George Bruns’ score is OK, but the best music in the film is the spirited Medfield Fight Song written by the Sherman Brothers, their first song for Disney. The $2 million production took in $9 million on its initial release, and re-releases over the years have brought the total theatrical receipts to over $29 million.

 
 Posted:   Mar 9, 2021 - 11:57 PM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Bob, As a very small boy i had no nuts to laugh off but that basketball match with the bouncy flubber trainers killed me.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.