Why bother calling it the Man From U.N.C.L.E then? The TV show was ripe for updating but that IP has now been tarnished for years because of Ritchie’s charmless, unconnected effort. And if they remade King Kong but it substituted a small kitten in place of a giant gorilla would you say critics of that decision were “too stuck in the past”?
You need to find an analogy that has a better chance of happening if you want me to answer your question.
Actually, the analogy is spot on. "Chance of happening" is irrelevant.
Ritchie’s U.N.C.L.E. Movie had zero resemblance to the TV show and wasn’t helped by the two leads who appear to have gone through a charisma and talent by-pass.
Fortunately the movie flopped so there isn’t too much chance of us being inflicted with a sequel.
Cavill and Hammer have plenty of charisma and talent.
And who cares if it bore zero resemblance to the TV show. Why are you so stuck on the past?
Why bother calling it the Man From U.N.C.L.E then? The TV show was ripe for updating but that IP has now been tarnished for years because of Ritchie’s charmless, unconnected effort.
And if they remade King Kong but it substituted a small kitten in place of a giant gorilla would you say critics of that decision were “too stuck in the past”?
You need to find an analogy that has a better chance of happening if you want me to answer your question.
I’m really not that interested in your answer to be honest.
Ritchie’s U.N.C.L.E. Movie had zero resemblance to the TV show and wasn’t helped by the two leads who appear to have gone through a charisma and talent by-pass.
Fortunately the movie flopped so there isn’t too much chance of us being inflicted with a sequel.
Cavill and Hammer have plenty of charisma and talent.
And who cares if it bore zero resemblance to the TV show. Why are you so stuck on the past?
Why bother calling it the Man From U.N.C.L.E then? The TV show was ripe for updating but that IP has now been tarnished for years because of Ritchie’s charmless, unconnected effort.
And if they remade King Kong but it substituted a small kitten in place of a giant gorilla would you say critics of that decision were “too stuck in the past”?
You need to find an analogy that has a better chance of happening if you want me to answer your question.
I’m really not that interested in your answer to be honest.
Ritchie’s U.N.C.L.E. Movie had zero resemblance to the TV show and wasn’t helped by the two leads who appear to have gone through a charisma and talent by-pass.
Fortunately the movie flopped so there isn’t too much chance of us being inflicted with a sequel.
Cavill and Hammer have plenty of charisma and talent.
And who cares if it bore zero resemblance to the TV show. Why are you so stuck on the past?
Why bother calling it the Man From U.N.C.L.E then? The TV show was ripe for updating but that IP has now been tarnished for years because of Ritchie’s charmless, unconnected effort.
And if they remade King Kong but it substituted a small kitten in place of a giant gorilla would you say critics of that decision were “too stuck in the past”?
You need to find an analogy that has a better chance of happening if you want me to answer your question.
I’m really not that interested in your answer to be honest.
So why did you ask the question in the first place?
THE UNBEARABLE WEIGHT OF MASSIVE TALENT---photo of Nicolas Cage on the Croatian film set of the movie in which he is paid $1 million to attend the birthday of a billionaire who is really a drug lord who has kidnapped his wife and daughter and the Mexican president's daughter.
They shoulda kidnapped that jacket!
I must say the only thing that sticks out about this thread is the pink jacket.
Ritchie’s U.N.C.L.E. Movie had zero resemblance to the TV show and wasn’t helped by the two leads who appear to have gone through a charisma and talent by-pass.
Fortunately the movie flopped so there isn’t too much chance of us being inflicted with a sequel.
Cavill and Hammer have plenty of charisma and talent.
And who cares if it bore zero resemblance to the TV show. Why are you so stuck on the past?
Why bother calling it the Man From U.N.C.L.E then? The TV show was ripe for updating but that IP has now been tarnished for years because of Ritchie’s charmless, unconnected effort.
And if they remade King Kong but it substituted a small kitten in place of a giant gorilla would you say critics of that decision were “too stuck in the past”?
You need to find an analogy that has a better chance of happening if you want me to answer your question.
I’m really not that interested in your answer to be honest.
So why did you ask the question in the first place?
