|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thats funny coz Batman says Tarantino isnt very interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Tell me about it. Why'dya think I gave him rubber Bat-nipples?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm no expert, but isn't the original 'Batman' a sort of tortured genius who was traumatised by his parents' assassination in front of him, and whose intent was to incarnate the darkest fears of the criminal? Isn't it an ego/shadow thing that US comic books play on to illuminate the adolescent's identity crises, like Spidey and Peter Parker? As such, there's plenty of scope for genuine development in the model. Not that it's ever been exploited properly. To take it back to period might be an idea? Didn't the original comic-book franchise strip back all the silliness ('Robin', the bat-cave etc.), somewhere in the late '60s and return him to his Gothic roots? At one point, didn't Robin go to college, and Batman travel the world? And even more so later? I haven't seen more than two of these movies, but it would seem, as ever, that the 'frnachise exploiters' have already added more and more anal-retent trappings and maguffin nonsense once more, and he needs streamlined back to health again. I've no vested interest, 'just sayin'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|