Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Aug 28, 2020 - 9:53 AM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Xebec, are theaters open where you live? I ask because you saw Tenet. None of our theaters are open in my area at this point.

Yes but we have almost no cases at the moment and when we do they're almos entirely Hutterite community.

The spacing between seats was massive and the theatre was almost empty anyway. Was never close to anyone. Half the patrons wore masks until they hit their seats anyway and all the workers did. Also went to a restaurant beforehand where there were 12 diners in a place that seated about 50. Never came near anyone except the masked server. Hand sanitizer everywhere these days too.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 28, 2020 - 10:24 AM   
 By:   joan hue   (Member)

Thanks for this information, Xebec. Maybe I'll move.wink

 
 Posted:   Aug 28, 2020 - 3:31 PM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

The Fourth Protocol (1987) ... 6/10

Enjoyable, if stupid, modern-day cold way spy thriller. With a cast of mostly Brits & Irish actors, excellent in their roles (well most of them had played such roles time and again) the only mistake is Ned Beatty (happily on screen for a few minutes only). Pierce Brosnan, in his first major role is good, and Michael Caine is sure-footed.

It's stupid because the plot tries to be too clever ... once you know the end you realise it doesn't hold-up ... far too much was left to chance; but without the twist we are left with a scenario in which a foreign state has sought to carry-out a terrorist act on British soil ... which, of course, couldn't happen ... smile

The film's structure (plot-line) is uneven (e.g. the opening sequence proving Caine/Preston is good at his job takes far too long ... and it's not central to the film's plot) and the detailed double-dealings setting up the act are too distinct from Caine's lead role.

There is some lovely scenery (Lapland, Finland ... and Essex frown) and a few good action scenes but this is more Smiley than Bond. The score by Lalo Schifrin is downbeat and not very interesting but good enough not to be intrusive.

As an aside, I do have memories of seeing it on its release in 1987 in Swansea: we were with friends staying on the Gower coast for the weekend and I recall having a discussion (argument?) with our host after I said it was the best film I'd seen that year; he challenged me re: it being a better film than Crocodile Dundee which he claimed was far more original ... clearly he had not seen many films. smile
Mitch

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 28, 2020 - 3:47 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

The Godfather (1972) ... 8/10

Also, storywise I have trouble with the timeline of the final act: Michael is attending the baptism of his nephew ... is this meant to be the child Connie is carrying when her husband (Paulie?) attacks her, so setting Sonny up? Surely not. But are we meant to accept that Paulie was allowed to remain within the family after this wife-beating?

Mitch



Connie's husband is "Carlo Rizzi" (Gianni Russo). "Paulie Gatto" (John Martino) is Don Vito's driver. "Sonny" (James Caan) later instructs "Clemenza" (Richard Castellano) to kill Paulie because of his role in setting up Don Vito for ambush. (Paulie had called in sick the day Don Vito was attacked.)

While it may not be that obvious, in the timeline of the film, a year passes between the time Micheal returns home from Sicily and when he sends Carlo and "Tom" (Robert Duvall) to Las Vegas. That allows plenty of time for Connie's baby to be born and then subsequently be baptized (which usually occurs within 3 months of birth). By the way, the baby in the baptism scene is Sofia Coppola.

As for Carlo being allowed to stay in the family after beating Connie, he is, of course, sent off to Vegas, away from Connie, and is later killed for conspiring with Barzini (Richard Conte) to have Sonny murdered.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 28, 2020 - 9:28 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

HELLBOUND (1994) - 7/10

While it's unclear as to whether HELLBOUND ever had a theatrical release, it still stands as one of Chuck Norris' better films. While I'm not a big fan of occult themes in westerns (see my review of THE DUEL above), I'm more accepting of the theme showing up in other genres. Here, it's combined with a police thriller.

When a dead prostitute literally drops into the laps of "Sergeant Frank Shatter" (Chuck Norris) and his black partner "Detective Calvin Jackson" (Calvin Levels), the two Chicago cops also find a dead Israeli rabbi and a strange artifact at the scene of the crime. After the murder, Shatter and Jackson’s presence is requested in Israel so the two can answer the questions of the local police force in Jerusalem. This sets off a "Da Vinci Code" type pursuit for the scattered pieces of an ancient scepter, in which our two cops get involved with a strange professor (Christopher Neame), his beautiful assistant (Sheree J. Wilson), and an emissary from Satan himself known as Prosatanos.

The film has good location shooting in Israel, a decent mystery, and plenty of action, all helmed by Chuck's brother Aaron Norris. There is also an OK score by George S. Clinton. This would prove to be Chuck Norris' last film for Cannon Pictures, mainly because the company went bankrupt soon thereafter.

Immediately after completing this film, Norris would begin playing another cop in the CBS series "Walker, Texas Ranger." Walker also had a black partner, played by Clarence Gilyard Jr. And Sheree Wilson would co-star with the pair as the local Asst. D.A. The three would remain together through the entire eight-season run of the show.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 28, 2020 - 10:44 PM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Bill and Ted Face the Music
1/10

Sadly, it's utter rubbish without a laugh in it. The daughters are quite good though.

 
 Posted:   Aug 29, 2020 - 2:10 AM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

The Godfather (1972) ... 8/10

Also, storywise I have trouble with the timeline of the final act: Michael is attending the baptism of his nephew ... is this meant to be the child Connie is carrying when her husband (Paulie?) attacks her, so setting Sonny up? Surely not. But are we meant to accept that Paulie was allowed to remain within the family after this wife-beating?

Mitch



Connie's husband is "Carlo Rizzi" (Gianni Russo). "Paulie Gatto" (John Martino) is Don Vito's driver. "Sonny" (James Caan) later instructs "Clemenza" (Richard Castellano) to kill Paulie because of his role in setting up Don Vito for ambush. (Paulie had called in sick the day Don Vito was attacked.)

While it may not be that obvious, in the timeline of the film, a year passes between the time Micheal returns home from Sicily and when he sends Carlo and "Tom" (Robert Duvall) to Las Vegas. That allows plenty of time for Connie's baby to be born and then subsequently be baptized (which usually occurs within 3 months of birth). By the way, the baby in the baptism scene is Sofia Coppola.

As for Carlo being allowed to stay in the family after beating Connie, he is, of course, sent off to Vegas, away from Connie, and is later killed for conspiring with Barzini (Richard Conte) to have Sonny murdered.


Thanks, Bob, for the correction re: the name of Connie's husband ... Carlo (how could I forget: I have an Italian cousin with than name smile). Yes, I recall the family dealing with the driver, Paulie but it is the timeline re: Carlo's treatment of Connie (so as to set-up Sonny) - their child's baptism which bothers me.

Sonny's murder happens whilst Michael is hiding in Sicily and, as you confirm, Michael is back in the US for a year (his own words) before he meets up with Kay; who knows how much time passes (during which he has sent Carlo to Las Vegas) before he can arrange the killings of the other Dons. Yet Connie surely gives birth within the first half of that 12 month period following Michael's return, so to suggest that Michael and Kay attend the baptism of a 3 month old stretches plausibility. Also, since Michael knows of Carlo's involvement in Sonny's murder I don't see him sending Carlo to Las Vegas. Added to which the killings of the Dons is far too easy.

These events (sloppy script), plus star Brando (over-acting, etc.), rob the film of one point for my rating.
Mitch

 
 Posted:   Aug 29, 2020 - 2:46 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

You are a disgraceful task master Mitch, splitting such hairs with perfection. big grin

You wait till i start on Dancing with dwarves ! wink

 
 Posted:   Aug 29, 2020 - 4:41 AM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

You are a disgraceful task master Mitch, splitting such hairs with perfection. big grin

You wait till i start on Dancing with dwarves ! wink


Bring it on ... I can take it! But, when you've watched the extended version you may have trouble finding any criticisms.

And the title with which I had confused the film (in those prehistoric - i.e. pre-internet - days) was Dance of the Dwarfs (1983) which starred the lovely Deborah Raffin. I recall John Barry's name had been linked with this earlier film but that could be poor memory.

 
 Posted:   Aug 29, 2020 - 6:13 AM   
 By:   Bill Carson, Earl of Poncey   (Member)

Luv ya buddy. Even if judgement is madder than a box of wasps shaken up!! 8 for the godfather??? Theyve locked people in asylums for less than that!! Lol. big grin

Funniest line in our chat the other night was your comment about not knowing what Dances with wolves was about before you saw it and Tg's killer sarcasm about What about Snakes on a Plane? Yeah what was that about?!!! Oooh it was about dogs on a bus!!! big grin big grin sorry, little things amuse tiny minds but i needed oxygen!!! smile

 
 Posted:   Aug 29, 2020 - 8:37 AM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)

The Dark Tower

8/10

Very good yarn.

Knowing little about the books, except that there are 6 or 7 of them, this film told a tight enclosed tale well... something it had to do in just a single film.

Were a studio in charge to greenlight a multi-chapter production ala LOTR I am sure many legitimate critiques of the movie could be ameliorated. They didn't. Even Stephen King himself on the special features grappled with the challenge of doing his opus in a single film. Many eviscerations of this film are absolutely unwarranted. Its a solid western sci-fi action film.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 29, 2020 - 11:49 PM   
 By:   Xebec   (Member)

Troop Zero
6.5/10

A whimsical little comedy about a misfit Girl Scout group trying to get their names into the gold record that was fired into space. Likeable child actors and heartwarming story.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2020 - 1:20 AM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)

Two Guns and a Coward. 6/10 with Anthony Steffen. A bit different than the usual. Steffen plays a circus trick shot who can't shoot people for real ( due to childhood trauma). He gets the credit for killing the villain's gang ( when he did it himself). Thus he's none too happy and gives hero some agro. Can the hero find his mojo in time? Nice to see Nello Pazzafini playing the circus ringmaster instead of a heavy. The young kid playing second fiddle wasn't as annoying as usual. Not a lot of gunplay, which was also a change. It was more story! Music by Rustichelli was a bit bellow par, at least for me.

 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2020 - 1:41 AM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

A Few Good Men (1992) ... 8/10

Multiple viewings have not diminished my enjoyment of this film. I did own the DVD which I gave to a neighbour a few years ago but last evening, a TV broadcast caught me (just to see the start, you understand ...) and so, this morning I'm bleary-eyed after another late night. And it wasn't even in widescreen!!!

A great cast, an enjoyable military courtroom drama ... I can recite a lot of the dialogue. It may not be a great film when compared with others but in that it keeps my attention throughout even after four or five viewings means I rate it highly.

Marc Shaiman's score is not one I've ever wanted to own ... it works in the film and there's some nice melodic work accompanying Tom Cruise/Kaffee in contemplative mood.

We watch a lot of the long-running TV series N.C.I.S. and this story is almost a follow-on ... what happens to those marines who go off-piste ... the few, that is, that Gibbs and his team don't kill smile
Mitch

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2020 - 10:45 AM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

HIGH SPIRITS (1988) - 6/10

In Ireland, "Peter Plunkett" (Peter O'Toole) manages the hotel at Castle Plunkett, a dilapidated castle that has been in his family for generations. He is told by the castle’s current owner, an American named Jim Brogan, that if the money owed on Castle Plunkett’s mortgage is not paid in three weeks it will be foreclosed and relocated to Malibu, California. Peter decides that to make Castle Plunkett profitable, he needs to advertise it as a haunted tourist attraction, with the staff playing the "ghosts." But when the staff bungles the operation for the first group of tourists that arrive, the castle's real ghosts begin to appear.

This mildly amusing comedy evolves into romantic entanglements between the primary living couple (Steve Guttenberg and Beverly D'Angelo) and the main ghost couple (Liam Neeson and Daryl Hannah). The pre-digital effects may evoke some nostalgia among older viewers, but they are crude by today's standards. George Fenton's lively score was released by GNP Crescendo.

The film's budget was reported as anywhere from $10 million to $17 million, but it pulled in less than $9 million at the U.S. box office. Director-writer Neil Jordan revealed that the film’s producers did not allow him to be involved with the final edit of the film, “making a bland comedy out of what was meant to be a biting satire.”

 
 Posted:   Aug 30, 2020 - 9:34 PM   
 By:   Warlok   (Member)

Fat Man And Little Boy
6/10

Watched this DVD last night. Good show, wished it had a little more run time consisting of more scientist debates on the bomb. Still good. Paul Newman did an excellent job as General Groves, smart but stubborn, with a mission. Impervious to humanitarianism. Dwight Schultz is also impressive as Dr. Oppenheimer. A character actor who plays the main base doctor is good as well, owing to the fact I genuinely like him (normally plays a flawed ass in stuff I've seen... nice to see him as a decent being!).

Morricone's score is effective. You could say he crafted a "General Groves theme". It strikes me now as it did on the score CD years ago: kind of odd, but probably apt to the film. Not something I would listen to though.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2020 - 2:38 AM   
 By:   Prince Damian   (Member)

Tarzan and the slave girl 6/10 with Lex Barker ( so mum was happy). Watchable and easy on the brain. Music by Paul Sawtell was ok. For a change it wasn't wall to wall.

Also The Magnificent Texan 2/10 with Glenn Saxson. Almost rubbish. It came on and then went off,what happened? Don't know, nothing? It was decently made. Francesco DeMasi's music was probably the best thing in it. Glad I didn't buy it.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2020 - 4:02 AM   
 By:   Rick15   (Member)

Gemini Man

Ummm....not sure what to make of this one. The film wasn't exactly what the trailers made it out to be.....Will Smith looked bored throughout most of it.....

I think it was a good concept done badly.

I may be kind giving it a 5/10.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2020 - 11:18 AM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

LET'S GET HARRY (1986) - 7/10

One thing raises this picture above the run-of-the-mill, mid-1980s action film--the presence of Robert Duvall in the cast. Mark Harmon is "Harry," an engineer / plumber from the Midwest who gets kidnapped by a version of the Colombian Cartel. His brother, played by Michael Schoeffling, leads a group of his plumber buddies (Tom Wilson, Glenn Frey, Rick Rossovich) into Colombia to rescue Harmon, who was employed as a pipeline worker. Also held captive by the guerrilla drug dealers is the U.S. Ambassador (Bruce Gray). Gary Busey is a fast-talking, trigger-happy, coke fiend--a car dealer who bankrolls the rescue mission and insists on going along. Since these guys are all amateurs, they need some help. They hire gung-ho veteran mercenary "Norman Shrike" (Robert Duvall), the only one who knows how to take down the guerrillas.

The film was written by Charles Robert Carner, from a story by Samuel Fuller and Mark Feldberg. Fuller was originally slated to direct, but opted-out to direct the ill-fated WHITE DOG. Stuart Rosenberg directed, but he was not satisfied with the film and had his name removed from the credits. The studio asked him to do re-shoots with greater screen time for Mark Harmon, who became a TV star on the "St. Elsewhere" series while the film was being shot. Even so, Harmon's role is limited.

Despite these behind-the-scenes issues, the film is competently made, the action is plentiful and not cheap-looking, and Robert Duvall makes everyone in the cast seem a little better. Brad Fiedel's score was released on LP by Varese Sarabande, who re-issued it on CD in 2015 as part of their LP-to-CD subscription series. LET'S GET HARRY barely had a release, taking in only $141,000 at the box office, but there are many worse action films out there.

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2020 - 1:51 PM   
 By:   MusicMad   (Member)

Gunn (1967) ... 2/10

I know of this film and its origin, the TV series Peter Gunn (1958-61), only from the fabulous music score by Henry Mancini. That said, the score to this film is no patch on the score to the TV series and perhaps that should have been a warning.

This film is nothing more than a glorified (no: make that an extended) episode of a very weak TV show of the 1960s. Only Ed Asner carries any acting weight ... the cast, including star Craig Stevens, are no better than walk-on parts for run-on-the-mill episodes of long-forgotten shows. Question: did Craig Stevens act as understudy/stand-in for Cary Grant? He appeared to model himself on that star ... lacking every quality apart from build and looks.

The script is awful, the plot rubbish and director Blake Edwards was having a very bad day. Apart from Mr. Asner, and a few attractive ladies, the best thing about this mess was Mancini's weak score (surely re-used atmospheric cues from earlier scores) and his very brief on-screen scene (non-credited) at the piano. The score includes a lovely melody, typical Mancini, but it is arbitrarily used and seems out of place. On the album there is a great track (A Quiet Happening) but this is heard only as a brief clip. A couple of vocals pass the time.

A poor quality 4:3 TV broadcast image didn't help, but this is rubbish ... big time!
Mitch

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.