 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of folks like me want to see/hear samples of the final product before putting out our hard earned money. There's also the impulse buyers and random buyers, neither of which come into factor with crowd funding.
OK, then this is not for you. It is for people who already know and like the music and are very confident in James's proven ability to produce great film music recordings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Jan 10, 2015 - 4:25 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
Tall Guy
(Member)
|
And, while I will admit music taste is an entirely subjective matter, I think it is plain classless and poor education to force debate here about what Tadlow should or should not be recording. Start your own thread, for goodness' sake...
Alex
What a brilliant, mature and cogent argument you have put forward there Alex. You've certainly showed your education and class. Did you write that all on your own or did you get a grown up to help you with the big words?
Sarcasm aside, as one who has questioned why Tadlow would want to record Moonraker (which I feel I did in a polite way) I happen to think that your comment about class and education is just idiotic and frankly insulting. This forum would be pretty damn dull if eveyone only ever posted in threads they agreed with. I don't think anyone has been rude about James' Kickstarter project, but have simply queried the merits of the enterprise and also whether there might be better projects to pursue. Personally ive found that quite an interesting debate and whilst I would personally rather stick needles in my eyes than buy another recording of Moonraker (I have the OST and never play it) I have no malice or ill- will towards the project at all. And Ive not seen any post from anyone else that suggests they are against the project.
But anytime you want to compare education, class and respective lifestyles built on those factors, then perhaps we could indeed start our own thread. As long as we clear it with you first I take it?
So, Mike - you in or out? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You entirely missed my point. Companies are erroneously setting up Kickstarter campaigns as a way to gauge interest in a product. There are too many missing variables with this tactic.
This Kickstarter campaign is about actually creating a product. I assume it does not exist without this £25,000 in funding, hence the campaign. You want to go into the future and get sound clips of some thing that does not exist yet.
Fans say they want this product. One option is to put $30 or whatever in the pot and see how it comes out. The other option is to sit on the sidelines and hope other people do it so you can check out a few sound clips if it gets funded and comes to Screen Archives later this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
