Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 9:51 AM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

I urge you to get therapy.


Nonsense.
LOL

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 9:53 AM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

... and Octoberman is a flawed canine.


You betcha, Bubbie.
big grin

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 9:55 AM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

I urge you to get therapy.

Nonsense.
LOL


So often, its the people that need it most that avoid it.

I'd urge you to consider what is looking back at you when you lock your phone or turn your computer off.

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 9:57 AM   
 By:   Yavar Moradi   (Member)

One thing I do feel is getting lost in this discussion is what Jerry Goldsmith himself wanted. Some folks seem to be acting like this book being released would be against HIS wishes and would be disrespectful to HIM. Well... from all accounts of this time from people who knew him, he may have been dying of cancer but he was in good control of his mental faculties. (His long interview with Jon Burlingame from 2003 bears this out as well.) And *he knew that his daughter was dedicating this time of her life to interview him for a book, to be published.* If he was overly frank with her when it came to opinions about people, he did it with the knowledge that she had the intent to publish. He wasn't tricked into saying those things "off the record" as far as I can tell. He knew he was dying of cancer, and he knew that his daughter was recording what he said with the intention of sharing it with the world afterwards. If he didn't want his unvarnished thoughts out there, he could have easily chosen to hold them back.

Yavar

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 9:58 AM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)


So often, its the people that need it most that avoid it.
I'd urge you to consider what is looking back at you when you lock your phone or turn your computer off.



Come to a few conclusions about yourself, have you?
Your self-sanctimony and projection is noted, thanks.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:06 AM   
 By:   LRobHubbard   (Member)

One thing I do feel is getting lost in this discussion is what Jerry Goldsmith himself wanted. Some folks seem to be acting like this book being released would be against HIS wishes and would be disrespectful to HIM. Well... from all accounts of this time from people who knew him, he may have been dying of cancer but he was in good control of his mental faculties. (His long interview with Jon Burlingame from 2003 bears this out as well.) And *he knew that his daughter was dedicating this time of her life to interview him for a book, to be published.* If he was overly frank with her when it came to opinions about people, he did it with the knowledge that she had the intent to publish. He wasn't tricked into saying those things "off the record" as far as I can tell. He knew he was dying of cancer, and he knew that his daughter was recording what he said with the intention of sharing it with the world afterwards. If he didn't want his unvarnished thoughts out there, he could have easily chosen to hold them back.

Unless someone has a Ouija board, NOBODY knows what Goldsmith wanted, since he (to my knowledge) didn't leave written instructions. And frankly, once you're dead, what YOU wanted is immaterial unless you set things up legally for things to be carried out.

I do agree that whatever he said to his daughter, who was recording it to be used in material to published, he just put it all out there, warts and all, because - 'why not?'

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:28 AM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)

This is getting weirdly personal between members, but that’s kinda how it goes here.

Was this situation any of our business? Not until Lukas kinda made it our business by putting it out there. Nobody actually asked. “I'll hit "publish" and see how this is received. Eeeek.” Meaning: here, tell me what you think.

The only person here who has a dog in this race is Lukas. It doesn’t really matter what we think. In the end, he keeps his own counsel, as do we all.

Personally, I really don’t care of the material is published or not. I most likely wouldn’t read it anyway. I don’t care what made Goldsmith tick or his relationships with other composers or his own family. What matters to me is the music Goldsmith left behind. Maybe the book shouldn’t be published. Perhaps it served its purpose in the writing. Perhaps Carrie used it as therapy. I think we could all use some.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:33 AM   
 By:   CCOJOE   (Member)

This is getting weirdly personal between members, but that’s kinda how it goes here.

Was this situation any of our business? Not until Lukas kinda made it our business by putting it out there. Nobody actually asked. “I'll hit "publish" and see how this is received. Eeeek.” Meaning: here, tell me what you think.

The only person here who has a dog in this race is Lukas. It doesn’t really matter what we think. In the end, he keeps his own counsel, as do we all.

Personally, I really don’t care of the material is published or not. I most likely wouldn’t read it anyway. I don’t care what made Goldsmith tick or his relationships with other composers or his own family. What matters to me is the music Goldsmith left behind. Maybe the book shouldn’t be published. Perhaps it served its purpose in the writing. Perhaps Carrie used it as therapy. I think we could all use some.


This right here.

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:35 AM   
 By:   Nicolai P. Zwar   (Member)



Personally, I really don’t care of the material is published or not. I most likely wouldn’t read it anyway. I don’t care what made Goldsmith tick or his relationships with other composers or his own family.


Actually, I would buy such a book in a minute and gobble it all up. I'd be very curious about stuff like that. But at the same token I'd agree that it's basically none of my business.

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:36 AM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

This is getting weirdly personal between members, but that’s kinda how it goes here.


Heh.
You may have a point.
But I would think that getting personal with the actual owner of this website is the weird part!

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:38 AM   
 By:   Yavar Moradi   (Member)

Personally, I really don’t care of the material is published or not. I most likely wouldn’t read it anyway. I don’t care what made Goldsmith tick or his relationships with other composers or his own family. What matters to me is the music Goldsmith left behind. Maybe the book shouldn’t be published. Perhaps it served its purpose in the writing. Perhaps Carrie used it as therapy. I think we could all use some.

I mean... the part of the book that was put online had a lot of stuff about his actual career, including details of his work in the 50s (and connecting with directors like Schaffner) which are fascinating and more detailed than other extant sources: http://www.jerrygoldsmithonline.com/spotlight_biography_preview.htm

This isn't just a gossipy tell-all or anything.

Yavar

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:41 AM   
 By:   The Shadow   (Member)

deleted

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:48 AM   
 By:   jackfu   (Member)

This is getting weirdly personal between members, but that’s kinda how it goes here.


Heh.
You may have a point.
But I would think that getting personal with the actual owner of this website is the weird part!


Surely you don't mean that some folks here might have some issues with Lukas and would use this opportunity to take some shots at him knowing there would be none of the ususal repercussions for making it personal, do you?

eek


 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:57 AM   
 By:   babbelballetje   (Member)

You do know how to launch a website!

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 10:59 AM   
 By:   Stephen Woolston   (Member)

There's some interesting comments here.

I think many of us assume we know what our favorite composers must be like in real life because we feel like we know them through their music.

For the vast majority of us, we do not, and I think most readers here know that.

We do not even know them because we met them once, or because they signed our CDs.

I've heard of some pretty asshole behavior from composers whose fans would be shocked by it. It would destroy the idealistic Disney image of who they were.

Then again, there is also hearsay.

I have no opinion on what Jerry Goldsmith, or his family members, were like in real life because I simply don't know. And for most of you reading this, you do not either.

Anyway, I understand where Lukas is coming from when he says he will not destroy what may be the only document of its kind on the composer. Should the information be lost to the ages? It's hard to say it should.

I also understand why Carrie and others fell out with him over it and got mad.

Yeah, it's a shit show alright.

Lukas screwed up and he has apologized.

Unless we think Jerry Goldsmith's one and only oral history and memoirs should be destroyed forever—and I can't bring myself to think it should—I don't see what more he can do.

Cheers

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 11:04 AM   
 By:   ryanpaquet   (Member)

Well I enjoyed the story Lukas thanks for sharing. Looking forward to future posts.

Writing something down and putting it out there in a way is healthy in my opinion. Sometimes it helps to share it so you can stop thinking about it, I see it as therapeutic and we all know the Internet isn't the best shrink, but it's free.

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 11:17 AM   
 By:   jackfu   (Member)

I don't know if Lukas has any legal obligation to return or destroy, especially if there were no expectations expressed as to Carrie's wishes before/when she entrusted him with the manuscript. Ethically perhaps, yes. But he has neither published nor "leaked" any of it - how many in our corporate media would be as ethical nowadays?

And if he did return/destroy the manuscript, as far as Carrie knows it's his word that he did so without keeping any copies for his own personal perusal. She would just have to take his word for it. And what's to prevent some lawyer from trying to raise a stink that they believe Lukas did not do as he said he would?

So, there's a kind of M*A*S*H 22 - type catch, isn't there?





*Apologies to the late Norm Crosby

 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 11:32 AM   
 By:   Nedmerrill   (Member)

You do know how to launch a website!

I think that was the point. Create a bit of controversy and watch the magic happen. That trick is as old as the hills but still works like a dream, especially in today's media fixated world. Although today's controversy can quickly be forgotten, you do have to stoke the fire now and again.


 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 12:05 PM   
 By:   haineshisway   (Member)

A few points—



3) To Bruce's point above, the problem is that even if Carrie was legally OK to publish her memories, if Carol sued anyway, it didn't matter who would win, the legal fight would be catastrophic.



Lukas


Well, Carol... and there you have it. Lawsuits that can't be won but are done anyway to cause harm and drain someone's finances. Been there, done that. And in the end, the person suing, knowing they cannot win, keep it going anyway. It is a huge flaw in our justice system, sadly.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 31, 2021 - 12:32 PM   
 By:   .   (Member)

d/p

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.