|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
Sep 27, 2010 - 4:21 PM
|
|
|
By: |
OnyaBirri
(Member)
|
Let the soundtrack labels do what they're good at: releasing soundtracks. When I'm listening to music, I could care less about the medium for which it was composed. Good soundtracks are better than bad jazz LPs. And vice versa. I listen to music, not soundtracks, so I honestly don't get where you're coming from. I'm pointing out a gaping hole in the catalog of an artist who composed many, many soundtracks, 9 of which have been released in the past year or so, 4 of which have supposedly sold out. So the notion of a "film score" label releasing what many believe to be the best of his output is so outlandish? This simply does not make sense - especially when they've all just been re-mastered for iTunes. Which is better, moving 1,000 units to 1,000 soundtrack fans, or moving 1,500 units to a combination of soundtrack fans and beyond? Sorry that I used a soundtrack-focused message board to express enthusiasm for a composer of soundtracks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|