|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
Jun 19, 2013 - 6:45 AM
|
|
|
By: |
mastadge
(Member)
|
Seriously? Don't be so gullible. What does Disney have to do with this anyway? She went to a party. Their not law enforcement. Her lawyers see a multi billion dollar company and see $$$$ signs. Would this lady even mention her employer otherwise? Disney's part in the story is that when she, as a Disney employee, turned to a counselor in their Disney's Employee Assistance Program -- also a Disney employee -- for guidance after having been raped, she received no support but rather some victim-blaming. Then, when she decided to follow-up on that inappropriate encounter, she found that there was no formal procedure for a Disney employee to report sexual assault to the company. She's not blaming Disney for her rape; she is condemning Disney for a failure to do anything but blame her when she, as one of their employees, was raped by another employee in housing that was, apparently, on company property. And you accuse me of gullibility(?) even as you make things up wholesale. Is there anywhere that she mentions lawyers or any sort of litigation? If she was filing a lawsuit, I guarantee you her lawyers would very strongly advise against a piece like this, which leads me to believe she is not. She states that she expected that Disney, a family-friendly business employing many young adults, would be interested in dealing with it when their employees are assaulted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After reading her account, I was struck by the number of mixed signals that were given. She goes to the party, she and he both drink, they go back to his place, they drink more. At any moment during all that, she could have stopped. Reminds me of how people in the 50's used to react when drunk drivers caused deaths: they used to say, "It was the alcohol."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|