|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, I have looked back in my collection and found the releases you were referring to.... I have been attempting to compare both versions and am at a loss to figure out which version is the better sound. Any observations would be of help. Many prefer the non-Dolby, though a few disagree. The newer ones are certainly greatly detailed. But think ... they're both good releases, and if you can't personally tell the difference, does it matter? Would you really have someone tell you what to prefer?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
Sep 10, 2017 - 7:20 AM
|
|
|
By: |
Expat@22
(Member)
|
Actually, I have looked back in my collection and found the releases you were referring to.... I have been attempting to compare both versions and am at a loss to figure out which version is the better sound. Any observations would be of help. Many prefer the non-Dolby, though a few disagree. The newer ones are certainly greatly detailed. But think ... they're both good releases, and if you can't personally tell the difference, does it matter? Would you really have someone tell you what to prefer?! Well, I was being a little vague I do suffer from tinnitus but having it for the past 30 years I have usually managed to ignore it, thank god. But sometimes it does creep in to my listening experience, particularly when tired or after having coffee. Those tend to be the moments when my critical faculties are dampened somewhat. When not plagued by that annoyance I have listened to the Dolby and non Dolby versions of Lost Horizon and find that the non Dolby version has a mid range that is detailed and expansive so that the entire soundstage is enhanced, compared to the Dolby version which sounds, as someone put it, muddied to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|