 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread 3,700,001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because it helps people keep track; they may want to know the answers, too, and the thread titles are so anonymous. He's got literally maybe over three dozen threads.
Because it would help him and everybody else keep track; surely he doesn't remember what's in all these individual threads?
And because when I helpfully pointed that out to him, he said he'd create a thread. That was like two years ago. That must be some mightily super impressive work of are to yet be unveiled.
And, of course, I counter you with the same: if you don't like what I post, put me on your ignore list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Jun 20, 2017 - 6:08 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
OnyaBirri
(Member)
|
Because it helps people keep track; they may want to know the answers, too, and the thread titles are so anonymous. He's got literally maybe over three dozen threads.
Because it would help him and everybody else keep track; surely he doesn't remember what's in all these individual threads?
And because when I helpfully pointed that out to him, he said he'd create a thread. That was like two years ago. That must be some mightily super impressive work of are to yet be unveiled.
And, of course, I counter you with the same: if you don't like what I post, put me on your ignore list.
I don't need to put you or anyone else on my ignore list. I am not afraid of opinions that differ from mine.
No one is suggesting that we lock or delete your catch-all identification thread, yet you seem to be intolerant of others' example-dedicated, descriptive threads. It would seem to me that both approaches have their validity, based on how individual members interface with the content. If one approach is generally preferred over the other, it will become apparent based on responses and thread bumps.
I can't speak for others, but the example-specific threads posted by mucrim (and others) work very well for me, because I can quickly determine which ones to visit and which to avoid. If mucrim says, "Identify this heroic Williams-like 80s theme," I don't need to click on it, because I will be utterly useless in that context. If mucrim, on the other hand, posts "Identify this jazzy 1960s theme" or "Identify this 70s Italian theme," I am drawn in, because I may know the answer, or at the very least may want to hear the music.
That's just me. This approach may not work for others, and those users are free to use the catch-all thread.
Regardless, we don't need interwebz police telling us how to organize our thoughts or structure our posts. We are all free to express our opinions and start or contribute to the kinds of threads that are meaningful to each of us.
Having said all this, I don't recognize the sax theme, and sadly, I don't think I've ever identified a single example that mucrim has posted thus far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
