|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Between Conti and Horner, which I like more? No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other.
|
|
|
|
|
These things always move in waves. Yes, the actual "favorite" composer of any given moment is the one I prefer to listen to at any given moment, may be anyone from Mozart to Madonna, depending on the moment. As far as film composers are concerned, I'm currently listening to a lot of Poledouris, Morricone, and Silvestri... but that's obviously going to change again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
Dec 9, 2016 - 12:37 AM
|
|
|
By: |
Ray Worley
(Member)
|
It's Horner for me...mainly because he has a larger body of top-notch scores. However, IMHO, neither one of them touches the greatness of Goldsmith, Morricone, E. Bernstein, Rozsa, J. Williams, Fielding, Moross, Herrmann, Waxman, Barry, North, Poledouris, A. Newman, Jarre, Delerue, Korngold, Goodwin, Rosenman, Rosenthal, M. Arnold, Frankel, or even among the newest contemporary composers, Desplat. Zimmer might be a toss-up with Horner...but I'd have to really think about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|