Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Oct 29, 2016 - 3:31 PM   
 By:   Mike_J   (Member)

As a kid growing up in the 70s I was a huge, huge Marvel comics fan. I pretty much loved every title they put out, with the exception of two, namely Thor and Dr Strange, both of which I found totally dull.

Flash forward to the era of the Marvel Studios. and Kenneth Branagh's Thor, which I went to see purely because my son wanted to - and man alive, was I impressed. What a great movie.

And so to Dr Strange - again, I went in with very low expectations and again, I was simply blown away. Marvel Studios have done it again, producing not just a great comic book movie but a terrific film, period. I don't think i've had so much fun in a cinema for a long time.

The film pretty much nails it on every level. The acting by Cumberbath and Swindon is superb, the action is brilliantly choreographed, the production design fabulous. Hell, I even loved the score, something of a first for me given that I have found pretty much everything else Giacchino has done to be entirely unmemorable.

But far and away the best bit of the film are the entirely bonkers distorted reality visuals. Comparisons to Inception are inevitable but Dr Strange out-does Nolan's movie by a country mile. Buildings and landscapes shift and spin, while the characters run up, under and over them, with the camera snaking around spectacularly whilst never out of control. Some of the sequences are simply gob-smacking and one shot in particular actually made me feel a slight dizzy vertigo, something I have never experienced in a cinema before.

See it in Imax 3D if you can - the visuals demand it.

Cannot wait to see it again.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 2, 2016 - 8:59 PM   
 By:   Bob DiMucci   (Member)

Saw the film yesterday, in regular widescreen 3-D. It's one of the few films that really benefits from 3-D. This promises to be one of the better additions to the Marvel film universe. And Giacchino's score one of the few current scores going on my want list.

 
 Posted:   Dec 3, 2016 - 4:59 PM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

But far and away the best bit of the film are the entirely bonkers distorted reality visuals. Comparisons to Inception are inevitable but Dr Strange out-does Nolan's movie by a country mile.

Advances in CGI are inevitable. But they relied on the Inception building-bending a bit much. I think that was the plan all along, because MCU showrunner Kevin Feige wants to keep everything pared down to that "magic is really advanced science the average dimwit cannot comprehend" stuff we first encountered in Thor. I was hoping for some weird stuff because Strange is one of Marvel's best characters, but they kept to the middle of the road. They even made the Eye of Agamotto the Time Stone. The only thing they seemed content with not providing an empirical explanation for was the Cloak of Levitation. And the villain was, again, forgettable. Kaecilius is a poor man's Mordo. They should have just had Mordo be the villain, per the comics.

In a nutshell, the film was entertaining, but it could have been much better. They also should have left Dormammu out of this one.

Some of the sequences are simply gob-smacking and one shot in particular actually made me feel a slight dizzy vertigo, something I have never experienced in a cinema before.

Watch Koyaanisqatsi and wait for the L.A. skyline flyover.

 
 Posted:   Mar 4, 2017 - 2:46 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

Has anyone seen that hilarious "Honest Trailers" vid. on the web?
Makes me even more likely to avoid this film

FUnniest bit: a collage of BC doing bad 'foreign accents" includng USA southern.
Let Cumberbatch be Cumberbatch, dammitt!

 
 Posted:   Mar 4, 2017 - 4:30 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

I really enjoyed the film. Not necessarily ground breaking, but entertaining and just different enough to differentiate it from the other MCU films. But yes, it could have been far more psychedelic like the scene where he grows fingers on his fingers. Could have used more of that.

 
 Posted:   Mar 4, 2017 - 5:06 PM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

I really enjoyed the film. Not necessarily ground breaking, but entertaining and just different enough to differentiate it from the other MCU films. But yes, it could have been far more psychedelic like the scene where he grows fingers on his fingers. Could have used more of that.

Exactly. We barely got enough to qualify as a parsley sprig. Derrickson did away with the incantations, too. He thought gestures would be much more cool. Too bad I didn't notice any. Strange ran around and waved his hand over the Stone. And talked down Dormammu.

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 8:35 AM   
 By:   Sean Nethery   (Member)

The movie worked very well for this bona fide fan of Doctor Strange in comics since the 70s. By the Vishanti, the incantations would have distanced the audience far too much - my guess is current audiences, especially the important young audience, would have found them ridiculous. Because, um, most of them are.

And I did see the good doc do his classic rabbit ears/devil ears (take your pick) hand gesture. And for heavens sake, he's wearing the yellow gloves in the mid-credits scene!

I thought the updates were sensible while keeping true to the spirit of the original character and milieu, and just enough of the old surrealism to be weirder than usual. My hope with a movie like this is that new audiences would groove to the character, not that they make a fan film for us duffers. I thought they did just that, and so did my 18 year old daughter. And I loved how they brought in Dormammu, thought that worked great.

Though I do wish Doc had said "Curse me for a novice!" Just once.

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 10:13 AM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

And I did see the good doc do his classic rabbit ears/devil ears (take your pick) hand gesture. And for heavens sake, he's wearing the yellow gloves in the mid-credits scene!

Fleeting nods to we comics fans. I could've forgiven everything had they at least not done away with the Cloak's magnificent collar.

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 11:18 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

While I thought the bending kaleidoscope effects were really cool, I bet they were deceptively cost effective to do. Once you got a particular pattern down, they probably just copied and mirrored the effect however many times needed for a scene.

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 11:38 AM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

While I thought the bending kaleidoscope effects were really cool, I bet they were deceptively cost effective to do. Once you got a particular pattern down, they probably just copied and mirrored the effect however many times needed for a scene.

Yep, that's why they OD'd on it.

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 11:57 AM   
 By:   Sean Nethery   (Member)

Whereas I have always kind of unconsciously hated the comics collar and so didn't even notice the more conservative or one might say coherent approach. I mean, man, that original collar would play hell with one's peripheral vision!

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 2:03 PM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

Not really. Rogers drew it with more of a curve but Ditko's was flat/straight. Either way, it's a part of his signature look.

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 2:13 PM   
 By:   Sean Nethery   (Member)

Signature, schmignature - dude, when you got nasties coming at you from every direction and dimension, you don't need cape horns in your way as you look over your shoulder. wink

Also, I like that they made the cape quasi sentient, and when the collar curled to his face, I think they were indeed referencing the classic design, if fleetingly. So I'm good with it.

These days, I find it more fun and relaxing to just take things as they come. The minute I saw the early costume photos, I was ready for this Strange One.

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 3:06 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Whereas I have always kind of unconsciously hated the comics collar and so didn't even notice the more conservative or one might say coherent approach. I mean, man, that original collar would play hell with one's peripheral vision!

I haven't read comics since the mid 70's so costume changes don't bother me because I'm not all familiar with the look of the characters. Perhaps eye sight isn't as important in the comics. Maybe theres some "Force" thing going on.

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 4:15 PM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

Signature, schmignature - dude, when you got nasties coming at you from every direction and dimension, you don't need cape horns in your way as you look over your shoulder. wink

We're not talking about Hawkeye and his ridiculous purple half-mask. Strange has powers beyond those of Joe Average Superhero. Shields and spells and all that jazz. A flat collar isn't going to block his view of an approaching demon. LOL! big grin

 
 Posted:   Mar 6, 2017 - 4:17 PM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

I haven't read comics since the mid 70's so costume changes don't bother me because I'm not all familiar with the look of the characters. Perhaps eye sight isn't as important in the comics. Maybe theres some "Force" thing going on.

Funny you should say that. There was a bit too much of that Star Wars-Force crap in the movie.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.