 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...will I be able to use them when I go to see ID Resurgence?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Apr 23, 2016 - 7:35 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
Metryq
(Member)
|
3D sucks
I've never been impressed by any "3D" technology, and I've played with many systems. The big problem is that there's more to our spatial perception than parallax. Our eyes also track (come together, or move apart) depending on how close something is, and they refocus for distance. With any parallax system—anaglyphic, Pulfrich, polarized, shutter, video visor—everything is at the same distance. So while your eyes are getting cues that something is closer or farther, the tracking and focus of your eyes is telling you something different. After a while your eyeballs begin to hurt from the conflict.
Until a truly holographic system comes along (and that doesn't mean the image has to float out in open space), parallax 3D will remain a gimmick that brings very little to movies dramatically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of COURSE the theatre provides the glasses, but if I still have all the pairs I've ever gotten from the 3D movies I've seen... might as well use them.
And RoryR.... while I wouldn't go as far as to say 3D sucks, I'll be honest with you... I'm just as happy seeing a film the NORMAL way! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh no... that's just the last film I saw in 3D(Actually, it's the LAST film I've seen... rarely go to the movies, since most movies SUCK! ), and to be honest with you, if I hadn't had three free passes to the theatre, I would've seen the film in 2D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
Apr 24, 2016 - 2:40 AM
|
|
|
|
By: |
Mike_J
(Member)
|
It does NOTHING for movies dramatically and is without question a gimmick, the desperate ploy of a dying industry, that being the theatrical distribution of movies.
Well a bunch of guys including Ridley Scott, James Cameron, Martin Scorsese, Alfonso Cuaron, Robert Zemeckis, Peter Jackson, Jean Luc Goddard and Steven Spielberg would disagree with that view.... and with all due respect, I think they know just a lil' bit more about cinema than you do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
Apr 24, 2016 - 7:39 AM
|
|
|
|
By: |
RoryR
(Member)
|
It does NOTHING for movies dramatically and is without question a gimmick, the desperate ploy of a dying industry, that being the theatrical distribution of movies.
Well a bunch of guys including Ridley Scott, James Cameron, Martin Scorsese, Alfonso Cuaron, Robert Zemeckis, Peter Jackson, Jean Luc Goddard and Steven Spielberg would disagree with that view.... and with all due respect, I think they know just a lil' bit more about cinema than you do.
Bullshit. They're just in business. It's not about an aesthetic, it's about making $$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
