|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
Mar 3, 2017 - 12:06 PM
|
|
|
By: |
Ron Pulliam
(Member)
|
This is interesting. Presumably Tadlow and the original session people were playing from the same scoresheets, so it goes without saying that any 'lean, angular dissonances' uniquely on the OST were the result, not of Goldsmith's intent, but rather of inaccuracies in the performance, creating a raw edge. So what are the purists in love with then, at bottom? I'll tell you what this OSR purist loves. Listening to an original recording, in this case one conducted by Goldsmith himself, offers something a re-recording, no matter how excellent, can't compete with, a portal to the past. There you are hearing across the expanse of time since it was recorded, Goldsmith right there conducting his own work. It's as close to that moment as one can now get. What's not to love? No offense Tadlow. AMEN!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|