Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Nov 15, 2015 - 12:11 PM   
 By:   arthur grant   (Member)

As promised in this month's "Now Listen To Me..." I've posted my review of this film and would love to receive your comments here or after the review itself, on the film or my review, + or - on either or both. http://thecinemacafe.com/the-cinema-treasure-hunter/2015/11/14/opening-up-a-treasure-the-night-of-the-hunter

 
 Posted:   Nov 15, 2015 - 3:22 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

Nice review with equally nice pics from the film, but I'm not convinced this movie is at the same level of signifigance as Battleship Potemkin and Citizen Kane. Certainly the most important movie Charles Laughton had anything major to do with, though.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 16, 2015 - 12:55 AM   
 By:   Preston Neal Jones   (Member)

FWIW, a few years before his death, Roger Ebert reported on his website a then-recent all-time favorite film poll which had named HUNTER to the top, Number One spot.

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 17, 2015 - 12:44 AM   
 By:   arthur grant   (Member)



Well I did mean in terms of its innovative approach, but honestly the more times I watch it, the more I boost it up my list of all time great American film masterworks. Perhaps as Ebert did.

Thanks Preston for the vote of confidence. I was hoping you would see my review but I was worried (and perhaps still am) that it might have disappointed you somewhat. Anyway I hope you liked it. I mentioned your excellent book on the making of the film in this month's 'Now Listen To Me..." here: http://thecinemacafe.com/the-cinema-treasure-hunter/2015/11/5/now-listen-to-me

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 17, 2015 - 5:16 PM   
 By:   Preston Neal Jones   (Member)

Hi, Arthur --

I haven't had time to do more than skim your HUNTER treatise so far, because I'm trying to catch up on everything that piled up while I was gone for 6 weeks. So I will read it, but I'm already certain it won't disappoint me. You've never let me down yet. (I guess THAT is a vote of confidence!)

BTW, if I wasn't clear about it, Ebert wasn't expressing his own (high) opinion of HUNTER, he was reporting the results of some poll or other. It led to quite an extensive set of comments, (some of them from me, naturally.)

 
 
 Posted:   Nov 18, 2015 - 12:39 AM   
 By:   arthur grant   (Member)

Hi, Arthur --

I haven't had time to do more than skim your HUNTER treatise so far, because I'm trying to catch up on everything that piled up while I was gone for 6 weeks. So I will read it, but I'm already certain it won't disappoint me. You've never let me down yet. (I guess THAT is a vote of confidence!)

BTW, if I wasn't clear about it, Ebert wasn't expressing his own (high) opinion of HUNTER, he was reporting the results of some poll or other. It led to quite an extensive set of comments, (some of them from me, naturally.)


Hey, thanks for letting me know. The "vote of confidence" I was referring to was specifically in regards to placing 'Hunter' in the ranks of the others I mentioned in terms of being "innovative", suggesting that it did in fact belong in the company of such well regarded cinematic achievements as the ones I mentioned. But I do appreciate your clarifications and am resting much easier now as to your thoughts on my review, which I will look forward to hearing about. Maybe I was just a little paranoid. It is after all entitled "Opening Up a Treasure".

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.