|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: |
Apr 4, 2017 - 8:53 AM
|
|
|
By: |
Grecchus
(Member)
|
Mars does have two natural satellites, only, they're clearly fragments of something. Their orbits are not quite co-planar, however, you wouldn't expect them to be. If they were part of a larger object which fragmented due to interaction with the larger body of Mars, then the reaction forces which broke them apart can account for their slightly different orbital planes. They basically comprise a smaller and a larger splinter. That's my 2 cents. Edit: I think they originated in the nearby asteroid belt. That means, in turn, the asteroid belt has to be very, very old. So now, you have to figure out how the asteroid belt got to be there. Fun, isn't it? There's this from the DM: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4378550/Remains-ancient-planet-spotted-orbiting-Mars.html A more scholarly treatment of olivine content/distribution on the surface of Mars: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2012JE004149/full And this short article: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7463-cold-dry-and-lifeless-a-new-take-on-mars/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|