Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2017 - 8:32 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Our Moon is tidal locked. They believe gravity from the Earth pulled magma to the surface from the near side.


But there are competing theories within the "mainstream."

http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/07/01/the_moon_s_two_faces_why_are_they_so_different.html

My point was, it's very hard to arrive at certainty when the matter is so complicated and the events are so far in the past.


I have heard of the "two Moons" theory. And it's certainly plausible. smile A similar theory has been presented for Mars.

 
 Posted:   Apr 4, 2017 - 8:53 AM   
 By:   Grecchus   (Member)

Mars does have two natural satellites, only, they're clearly fragments of something. Their orbits are not quite co-planar, however, you wouldn't expect them to be. If they were part of a larger object which fragmented due to interaction with the larger body of Mars, then the reaction forces which broke them apart can account for their slightly different orbital planes. They basically comprise a smaller and a larger splinter. That's my 2 cents.

Edit: I think they originated in the nearby asteroid belt. That means, in turn, the asteroid belt has to be very, very old. So now, you have to figure out how the asteroid belt got to be there. Fun, isn't it? wink

There's this from the DM: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4378550/Remains-ancient-planet-spotted-orbiting-Mars.html

A more scholarly treatment of olivine content/distribution on the surface of Mars:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2012JE004149/full

And this short article:

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7463-cold-dry-and-lifeless-a-new-take-on-mars/

 
 Posted:   Apr 5, 2017 - 8:06 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)


Edit: I think they originated in the nearby asteroid belt. That means, in turn, the asteroid belt has to be very, very old. So now, you have to figure out how the asteroid belt got to be there. Fun, isn't it? wink


The asteroid belt is believed to be a failed planet that never totally formed, or one that broke apart when Jupiter and Saturn did their dance and traded places in the solar system.

 
 Posted:   Apr 5, 2017 - 8:13 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

@ Grecchus- Did you see these images? I did a fast picture search.



 
 Posted:   Apr 5, 2017 - 9:36 AM   
 By:   Grecchus   (Member)

I've seen various 'portraits' of what the Martian surface may have resembled sometime in the distant past. It seems likely the north western cliff edge of Olympus Mons is the way it is today because of how it was yesteryear, and the erosional qualities of a fast moving fluid are a prime candidate for making it that way.

If there really was a large body of water on Mars back then, the tragedy of its loss is of a magnitude beyond contemplation. I just read Lovelock's Ages Of Gaia, and the state of Mars today is a stark warning to us of what is probably in store for earth as the Sun's heat output rises inexorably. We have a problem because we are the problem.

Lovelock believes that ice ages are the natural, more comfortable state of the earth for, believe it or not, the totality of life on its surface. The ice ages last for hundreds of thousands of years. He thinks our current period is an "interglacial" period, and that Gaia will eventually readjust the internal controls to bring on the next ice age. Humans have appeared in the interglacial period when there is naturally more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. And we are putting even more carbon dioxide in and wildly rocking the boat at this fragile juncture in the Gaian cycle. With the destruction of the habitat Gaia would normally employ to bring down the temperature to more comfortable levels, we are destroying the infrastructure this normalizing process needs to bring environmental temperature balance back. Things will get hotter and hotter and there is nothing we can do about it.

 
 Posted:   Apr 5, 2017 - 10:09 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

I've seen various 'portraits' of what the Martian surface may have resembled sometime in the distant past. It seems likely the north western cliff edge of Olympus Mons is the way it is today because of how it was yesteryear, and the erosional qualities of a fast moving fluid are a prime candidate for making it that way.

If there really was a large body of water on Mars back then, the tragedy of its loss is of a magnitude beyond contemplation. I just read Lovelock's Ages Of Gaia, and the state of Mars today is a stark warning to us of what is probably in store for earth as the Sun's heat output rises inexorably. We have a problem because we are the problem.

Lovelock believes that ice ages are the natural, more comfortable state of the earth for, believe it or not, the totality of life on its surface. The ice ages last for hundreds of thousands of years. He thinks our current period is an "interglacial" period, and that Gaia will eventually readjust the internal controls to bring on the next ice age. Humans have appeared in the interglacial period when there is naturally more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. And we are putting even more carbon dioxide in and wildly rocking the boat at this fragile juncture in the Gaian cycle. With the destruction of the habitat Gaia would normally employ to bring down the temperature to more comfortable levels, we are destroying the infrastructure this normalizing process needs to bring environmental temperature balance back. Things will get hotter and hotter and there is nothing we can do about it.


Totally agree.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.