Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Aug 2, 2015 - 12:17 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Interesting overview of the FF franchise.



 
 
 Posted:   Aug 2, 2015 - 1:46 PM   
 By:   riotengine   (Member)

Thanks for posting that. Seems to be an excellent summation of everything I've read so far about this impending cinematic superhero trainwreck.

Greg Espinoza

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 2, 2015 - 1:47 PM   
 By:   Mike_J   (Member)

I have to say I'm rather intrigued about all the controversies about the new FF movie and I can't wait to see if the film turns out to be rubbish, as is the groundswell of opinion at the moment it seems, or if it actually comes good.

Personally I'd love it to be great but at the moment nothing I've seen even remotely gets me rooting for this film.

I really don't care that Johnny Storm is now African-American or that the team are a bunch of youngsters. I can even get past the fact that Jamie Bell seems hopelessly miscast as Ben Grimm.

And certainly I thought Trank's first movie Chronical was superb - actually saw it twice at the cinema I enjoyed it so much.

But the trailers are uniformly dull, dull, dull. It looks incredibly studio-bound and very limited in scope. Say what you will about the Tim Story FF movies but at least they got into the outside world, in daylight. It looks like a TV movie, and not a very expensive one either. And don't even get me started on th fact that, yet again, they seem to have got the Thing wrong.

Now I accept that Fox may have been holding back with the trailers and thee may be some absolutely stunning action set pieces in the finished movie. But the fact they have put an embargo on any reviews right up to the point of release in North America (somewhat pointless given the film opens theatrically in France on Tuesday) does not bode well.

I'll try and keep an open mind but for now, colour me unexcited.

 
 Posted:   Aug 2, 2015 - 2:09 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

A lot of "troubled" productions end up being very good films. So that alone won't necessitate a bomb. But there are plenty of red flags.

What gets me are studios that refuse to give up movie rights to a property they have no interest in. They rather crank out a cheap product at the eleventh hour, just to hold onto the rights. Egotism and greed at it's height.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 3, 2015 - 6:20 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

That is an extremely thorough take apart you posted there.

Interestingly the studios gambled on giving two novice young directors very expensive blockbusters this year.

The first one was Colin Treverrow, who had directed a little movie called Safety Not Guaranteed. I thought it was overly quirky and did not go much of anywhere. But then Jurassic World fell into his lap and it has made a fortune, and with good reviews.

The second is Josh Trank, who directed the overpraised Chronicle. Then Fox gave him Fantastic Four, and apparently he was in way - way over his head. Lots of studio fix it guys have forced through this picture which they apparently have no confidence in. It is so bad that the actors doing PR are telling us they have not seen the picture yet, and Fox has embargoed all reviews.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 3, 2015 - 9:26 AM   
 By:   CinemaScope   (Member)

I enjoyed the first two movies, they were bright & breezy & colourful & fun. I don't know what the new one is going to be like.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 3, 2015 - 9:57 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

I enjoyed the first two movies, they were bright & breezy & colourful & fun. I don't know what the new one is going to be like.


It looks like bad news, because the new IN style is angst, shadows, darkness and turmoil.
They are making these movies with a grey color palette and then grading them with some blue hues nowadays. You can thank Nolan and Zack Snyder for the ugly fest.


 
 Posted:   Aug 3, 2015 - 11:06 AM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

They are making these movies with a grey color palette and then grading them with some blue hues nowadays. You can thank Nolan and Zack Snyder for the ugly fest.

That didn't start with Nolan and Snyder. That started with Payback.

FWIW, Interstellar is a beautiful film. Snyder got Larry Fong (cinematographer) back for Batman v. Superman, and the teaser/trailer and Empire article stills look amazing. Plenty of color.

 
 Posted:   Aug 3, 2015 - 12:13 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)


FWIW, Interstellar is a beautiful film. Snyder got Larry Fong (cinematographer) back for Batman v. Superman, and the teaser/trailer and Empire article stills look amazing. Plenty of color.


I don't know about that. The Bat and Sup scenes all look blue tinted and the Wonder Women scenes look brown tinted.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 3:09 AM   
 By:   Rick15   (Member)

They are making these movies with a grey color palette and then grading them with some blue hues nowadays. You can thank Nolan and Zack Snyder for the ugly fest.

That didn't start with Nolan and Snyder. That started with Payback.

FWIW, Interstellar is a beautiful film. Snyder got Larry Fong (cinematographer) back for Batman v. Superman, and the teaser/trailer and Empire article stills look amazing. Plenty of color.


Hey DF,,,you mentioned this before in another thread as well. Guess it;s hard to compare because one movie seems to be set primarily at night (Bats V Supes) and one is just.....bright...

But BvS seems to me to be tonally and visually....dark. And there's nothing wrong with that...it features the Dark Knight after all. Not that that's a bad thing. The more I watch MoS, the more I enjoy it. I'm really looking forward to the BvS movie. But it does seemed drained of colour.





Dammit...I'm trying to post pictures to compare....but nothing is working!!

 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 8:13 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

They are making these movies with a grey color palette and then grading them with some blue hues nowadays. You can thank Nolan and Zack Snyder for the ugly fest.

That didn't start with Nolan and Snyder. That started with Payback.

FWIW, Interstellar is a beautiful film. Snyder got Larry Fong (cinematographer) back for Batman v. Superman, and the teaser/trailer and Empire article stills look amazing. Plenty of color.


Hey DF,,,you mentioned this before in another thread as well. Guess it;s hard to compare because one movie seems to be set primarily at night (Bats V Supes) and one is just.....bright...

But BvS seems to me to be tonally and visually....dark. And there's nothing wrong with that...it features the Dark Knight after all. Not that that's a bad thing. The more I watch MoS, the more I enjoy it. I'm really looking forward to the BvS movie. But it does seemed drained of colour.


Dammit...I'm trying to post pictures to compare....but nothing is working!!


It's not just dark. Contrast are to the extremes. It looks like something that needs to be adjusted except its made that way on purpose.

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 8:33 AM   
 By:   CinemaScope   (Member)

I think there's a lot of showings today, so some online reviews should start coming in.

 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 8:35 AM   
 By:   Charles Thaxton   (Member)

Roger Corman should re-do his FF film using all the live actor footage and upgrade the bad efx with current CGI. wink

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 10:33 AM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

A couple things.

You notice that the director, Josh Trank has not been in the press at all this week.
The producer Simon Kinberg was sent out to do some interviews and talk it down. It is really obvious between Trank being removed from directing duties on a future Star Wars movie, to not showing up in Anaheim, and not running any press - that Fox has shut this guy down completely.

I think that the worse the pre-release hate is the better. for Fox. If the film is marginal, or grade C, when the expectation are that it is a complete disaster, people go see it and think "it was way better than I thought". If there was no pre release rumor about all the production trouble and disasters then people would see the movie and be really disappointed, but the pre-release negative talk, if anything, only helps Fox - unless it is stunningly bad. The fact is that for most movie goers in the US, a mediocre movie is often regarded as 'pretty good'. Last year saw some really mediocre movies, or worse, make a whole lot of money. So if the worst condition of FF is that it is stitched together mediocrity, then it is hardly a disaster. Other than Mission Impossible, or further back, Ant Man, there is probably audience to go see a mediocre action movie, so they might get lucky with the calendar on this one, whereas a few months ago it would be barely a blip.

 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 12:00 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

A couple things.

You notice that the director, Josh Trank has not been in the press at all this week.
The producer Simon Kinberg was sent out to do some interviews and talk it down. It is really obvious between Trank being removed from directing duties on a future Star Wars movie, to not showing up in Anaheim, and not running any press - that Fox has shut this guy down completely.

I think that the worse the pre-release hate is the better. for Fox. If the film is marginal, or grade C, when the expectation are that it is a complete disaster, people go see it and think "it was way better than I thought". If there was no pre release rumor about all the production trouble and disasters then people would see the movie and be really disappointed, but the pre-release negative talk, if anything, only helps Fox - unless it is stunningly bad. The fact is that for most movie goers in the US, a mediocre movie is often regarded as 'pretty good'. Last year saw some really mediocre movies, or worse, make a whole lot of money. So if the worst condition of FF is that it is stitched together mediocrity, then it is hardly a disaster. Other than Mission Impossible, or further back, Ant Man, there is probably audience to go see a mediocre action movie, so they might get lucky with the calendar on this one, whereas a few months ago it would be barely a blip.


My line of thought was similar. The prepress is so bad, I wonder if it might actually have a great opening weekend because everyone wants to see the "disaster", so they can make fun of it afterwards. Much like "50 Shades Of Grey".

 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 2:39 PM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

Hey DF,,,you mentioned this before in another thread as well. Guess it;s hard to compare because one movie seems to be set primarily at night (Bats V Supes) and one is just.....bright...

But BvS seems to me to be tonally and visually....dark. And there's nothing wrong with that...it features the Dark Knight after all. Not that that's a bad thing. The more I watch MoS, the more I enjoy it. I'm really looking forward to the BvS movie. But it does seemed drained of colour.





Dammit...I'm trying to post pictures to compare....but nothing is working!!


I saw the pics in another window. You posted the close-up of Cavill with the S-curl (a night pic) during the confrontation with an armored Batman, and the Empire cover. Yes, there will be a lot of night/dusk/haze action in the movie, which I'm all for. Not every scene has a filter.




 
 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 3:58 PM   
 By:   Rick15   (Member)



I saw the pics in another window. You posted the close-up of Cavill with the S-curl (a night pic) during the confrontation with an armored Batman, and the Empire cover. Yes, there will be a lot of night/dusk/haze action in the movie, which I'm all for. Not every scene has a filter.


Point taken.

My next wish is that they release a trailer that has Henry Cavill actually speaking...

 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 5:11 PM   
 By:   Charles Thaxton   (Member)

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie/fantastic-four/review/813140?facebook_20150804

 
 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 5:36 PM   
 By:   Ado   (Member)

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie/fantastic-four/review/813140?facebook_20150804

This is pretty rare for me, but this sounds actually worse than I thought. It sounds like a real chore to watch.

 
 Posted:   Aug 4, 2015 - 6:29 PM   
 By:   drop_forge   (Member)

I just read the same review on Yahoo. He had absolutely nothing good to say about it. I'm not surprised. I expect more reviews like it to roll in. If the movie tanks, Fox will hold off on solo FF films until 2022 and do the FF/X-Men crossover film(s) Singer's hinted at.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.