You could probably substitute her for a lion tamer with whip and get the same visual effect (and then get uproar from animal welfare protesters).
I don't want to get political here. But no one listens to animal rights activists. But if something is considered to sexually suggestive it will get taken down in a second.
I remember a commercial a year or two back where a family were riding in their car. The daughter was named after their car, I think it was a Sierra. The daughter asked her parents why she had the same name and the parents gave the impression she was conceived while they had sex in the car. They not soon after censored that line and changed the joke.
I remember a commercial a year or two back where a family were riding in their car. The daughter was named after their car, I think it was a Sierra. The daughter asked her parents why she had the same name and the parents gave the impression she was conceived while they had sex in the car. They not soon after censored that line and changed the joke.
It's pathetic that they think that crosses the line. And it's not just me - my daughter Shopdoorway thinks so too.
I remember a commercial a year or two back where a family were riding in their car. The daughter was named after their car, I think it was a Sierra. The daughter asked her parents why she had the same name and the parents gave the impression she was conceived while they had sex in the car. They not soon after censored that line and changed the joke.
It's pathetic that they think that crosses the line. And it's not just me - my daughter Shopdoorway thinks so too.
I find it quite ironic that whilst certain boundaries have been stretched further over the decades (e.g. sex + nudity in films/TV), the "prudish" P.C. brigade also seem to increasingly interfere to censor what's right and wrong with anything and everything.
I wonder who these people that complain actually are, and whether they're in a dwindling minority that will have become completely extinct in a few generations time, as their up-and-coming replacements become more open-minded, and anything goes.
I find it quite ironic that whilst certain boundaries have been stretched further over the decades (e.g. sex + nudity in films/TV), the "prudish" P.C. brigade also seem to increasingly interfere to censor what's right and wrong with anything and everything.
I wonder who these people that complain actually are, and whether they're in a dwindling minority that will have become completely extinct in a few generations time, as their up-and-coming replacements become more open-minded, and anything goes.
It's a forever revolving door based on where the social barometer swings. Certain groups win out for certain decades then things swing back. The 60's and 70's started to open up boundaries then in the late 80's and 90's there was moral outrage and things got pushed back. Right now we are in the middle, in some ways we are more open minded as a society while in other ways we are not. This is true of human history over the centuries and in every part of the world.
