Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   May 8, 2015 - 1:54 PM   
 By:   Mr. Popular   (Member)

Instead, it is controlled by contracts and licences and bureaucracy by a few business people.

I think we should aim our energy at this. Contracts and licences ar based on a method of music distribution soon to be archaic and should be changed quickly. Grasping on to cd's or any old medium and keeping a secondary market alive, won't ultimately change anything. It will be a downward spiral, where our beloved music won't be more available in the end.

The problem is protectionist laws, not the medium.


I don't care if labels are involved or the artists themselves, contracts will ALWAYS exist between parties.

 
 
 Posted:   May 8, 2015 - 8:06 PM   
 By:   Smaug   (Member)

This has turned into about what art is?!

art is created for all sorts of reasons, but about 90% of what we know of as art (music, painting, sculpture, etc.) was created for money.

 
 Posted:   May 9, 2015 - 3:14 AM   
 By:   johnbijl   (Member)

I don't care if labels are involved or the artists themselves, contracts will ALWAYS exist between parties.

Indeed. But the parties that should be the most involved are the artist (or craftsmen) and the consumer (listener, in this case). Middle men should be there to easy the contract between them, not to make it more difficult, let alone impossible.

 
 Posted:   May 9, 2015 - 6:30 AM   
 By:   Stephen Woolston   (Member)

Limited downloading is understandable for the reasons cited.

However, downloading will, I think, eventually be superseded by streaming, where you pay your subscriptions and have open access to a wide range of content (more than you'd be able to 'buy' with the same money) without the burden of having to download it and manage your own storage and backups.

In the streaming world, the withdrawal of content would be much more problematic.

Cheers

 
 Posted:   May 9, 2015 - 6:50 AM   
 By:   The Thing   (Member)

Limited downloading is understandable for the reasons cited.

However, downloading will, I think, eventually be superseded by streaming, where you pay your subscriptions and have open access to a wide range of content (more than you'd be able to 'buy' with the same money) without the burden of having to download it and manage your own storage and backups.

In the streaming world, the withdrawal of content would be much more problematic.

Cheers



I've never used any of these streaming services.

Do they all have the same content?

Or would you end up having to pay subscriptions to multiple service providers to have access to a wider range of titles than you would get from just one of them?

What happens when one of the providers you don't use has exclusive rights to distribute titles you want to hear.

 
 
 Posted:   May 9, 2015 - 7:07 AM   
 By:   TerraEpon   (Member)

That's pretty much how it's been for video games since the early 70s. Want to play game X? You need a console that plays game X. Too bad game Y you also want to play is on a different console...

Though, granted, consoles are a one time purchase, not monthly.

 
 Posted:   May 9, 2015 - 7:11 AM   
 By:   The Thing   (Member)

I figured that would be the case.

Still, at least the next generation of consumers will be more accepting to these changes, because they won't be used to the "old" way.

 
 
 Posted:   May 9, 2015 - 9:10 AM   
 By:   jkannry   (Member)

But there's no record it was ever there. Vanishes from wish lists.Talk about without a trace. Soundtrackcollector does not track or follow digital releases especially digital only releases.

I wonder when used market will catch up and people will be allowed to sell digital albums they purchased. Impossible without some digital signature to prove if copy or original purchase. Meaning we will need that signature.



There is a digital signature. If you buy music off of iTunes check the "Get Info" the purchasers name is listed in the meta tags under "Purchased Buy". (Including date of purchase)


Okay then why isn't there a used market? Especially out of digital print titles?

 
 Posted:   May 9, 2015 - 9:55 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

But there's no record it was ever there. Vanishes from wish lists.Talk about without a trace. Soundtrackcollector does not track or follow digital releases especially digital only releases.

I wonder when used market will catch up and people will be allowed to sell digital albums they purchased. Impossible without some digital signature to prove if copy or original purchase. Meaning we will need that signature.



There is a digital signature. If you buy music off of iTunes check the "Get Info" the purchasers name is listed in the meta tags under "Purchased Buy". (Including date of purchase)


Okay then why isn't there a used market? Especially out of digital print titles?


Not lawful I guess. Not only can't you sell your digital collection, your family can't gain ownership of your digital collection (via inheritance) when you die. A man tried to fight for that right in court and lost.

 
 Posted:   May 10, 2015 - 12:00 AM   
 By:   Adventures of Jarre Jarre   (Member)

  • This has turned into about what art is?!

    art is created for all sorts of reasons, but about 90% of what we know of as art (music, painting, sculpture, etc.) was created for money.


  •  
     Posted:   May 10, 2015 - 12:11 AM   
     By:   Adventures of Jarre Jarre   (Member)

  • Limited downloading is understandable for the reasons cited.

    However, downloading will, I think, eventually be superseded by streaming, where you pay your subscriptions and have open access to a wide range of content (more than you'd be able to 'buy' with the same money) without the burden of having to download it and manage your own storage and backups.

    In the streaming world, the withdrawal of content would be much more problematic.

    Cheers


    For that to become the status quo, two matters must occur:

    1. The genocide of all digital piracy and hackery. Sony paid its cloud-loving price recently (twice, in movie and videogame form), and the day we have a fully streaming world of entertainment is the day we finally democratically vote for our legislature online, American Idol style.

    2. People would have to evolve in a manner of eschewing the ownership of physical objects, at least in terms of media. They may do so out of convenience, there will be resistance (people may start pirating physical media using 3d printing, especially hipster, because ironic detatchment), but it's not as impossible an instance as #1.

  •  
    You must log in or register to post.
      Go to page:    
    © 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
    Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.