 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly. Patton has been rerecorded (with Tora Tora Tora) by Varese...though I didn't care much for it. In Harm's Way relates to the Pacific side of WWII, like Inchon and MacArthur, and it hasn't been rerecorded beyond a track or two. It also hasn't been released in complete form...
Yavar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why on earth Tadlow have seen fit to re-record music we all ready have in complete form and conducted by Jerry Goldsmith himself I will never understand. Utterly bizarre. Can't wait to see the awful artwork.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As James Fitz keeps saying it's not a re-recording, it's a NEW recording. Just like the many, many, many, many, many
new recordings that come out all, all, all, all, all, all the time in the Classical world.
It's another way of keeping music alive and vital, in ADDITION to having classic recordings. Those who don't want it are welcome to pass on it, but those of us who will be happy to have it will, um, be happy to have it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why on earth Tadlow have seen fit to re-record music we all ready have in complete form and conducted by Jerry Goldsmith himself I will never understand. Utterly bizarre. Can't wait to see the awful artwork.
I hope you never find out how many recordings there are of "The Rite of Spring." (And the composer only conducted about three of them.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
May 1, 2015 - 5:41 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
Spymaster
(Member)
|
As James Fitz keeps saying it's not a re-recording, it's a NEW recording. Just like the many, many, many, many, many
new recordings that come out all, all, all, all, all, all the time in the Classical world.
It's a little different to the classical world. The original film soundtrack recording is easily considered "definitive" because it's locked forever into the film, and engrained that way into our consciousness. An updated recording may bring new life to the music, but it's always going to be subject to direct comparison - and will always be seen as an alternative rather than the real deal. New recordings of a classical work can, I guess, be traced back to the very first recording of that work, but the "definitive" recording is far more open to interpretation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why on earth Tadlow have seen fit to re-record music we all ready have in complete form and conducted by Jerry Goldsmith himself I will never understand. Utterly bizarre. Can't wait to see the awful artwork.
'Jerry Goldsmith Online is not officially endorsed by the Jerry Goldsmith estate' ....
from Golddigger's website.
No bleedin' surprise.
(I had to transcribe that quote because the site won't allow right-clicking. So vital and important that script is, don't y'know ....)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why on earth Tadlow have seen fit to re-record music we all ready have in complete form and conducted by Jerry Goldsmith himself I will never understand. Utterly bizarre. Can't wait to see the awful artwork.
I mean, when I read that, I thought it was ironic.
Imagine a devotee of a composer, who wants to further said composer's profile on the planet for posterity, COMPLAINING ABOUT RECORDINGS OF THAT COMPOSER'S WORK!!!!!!!
This is what happens when the film-music buff's absurd little microcosm of subculture oozes its silly puss of values out into the rest of his psyche. Leap off the pinnacle of the Temple and lose touch with reality.
I mean c'mon ... I really thought it was ironic. What quasi-cultural refracted perversity is going on here?
By the way, readers of this post may not right-click. We don't want anyone stealing this divinely inspired material and passing it off as a Booker Prize entry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
... Can't wait to see the awful artwork.
What, like the inspired tat on your website?
I'm one of those who doesn't love original movie-poster art, it's on a tackier plane than the movies it 'celebrates'. Tadlow's artwork is fine. The Prometheus 'Quo Vadis?' was a bit odd, with all those funny and conceptually inapt swords, but that was not a Tadlow decision.
Ingrate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why on earth Tadlow have seen fit to re-record music we all ready have in complete form and conducted by Jerry Goldsmith himself I will never understand. Utterly bizarre. Can't wait to see the awful artwork.
Troll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As James Fitz keeps saying it's not a re-recording, it's a NEW recording. Just like the many, many, many, many, many
new recordings that come out all, all, all, all, all, all the time in the Classical world.
It's a little different to the classical world.
How exactly?
Who Decided this yet exactly?
Some fanboys who pulled that opinion out of their asses?
The original film soundtrack recording is easily considered "definitive" because it's locked forever into the film, and engrained that way into our consciousness.
Ah, so this is fanboy at it's worst...
It's also called MUSIC and it shouldn't just die with a single recording.
Also the soundtrack was recorded with the film in mind, sometimes it's nice to hear other artists present their own take on it using modern recording methods that allow on to hear details that were no clear in the original recording which wasn't designed to be heard apart from the film.
An updated recording may bring new life to the music, but it's always going to be subject to direct comparison - and will always be seen as an alternative rather than the real deal.
So using your fanboy logic, the only REAL thing is the soundtrack recording for the film all others are worthless and FAKE.
Is that what you saying?
That a very myopic way to live one's life.
INew recordings of a classical work can, I guess, be traced back to the very first recording of that work, but the "definitive" recording is far more open to interpretation.
According to FANBOY..
Some of the other folks don't mind hearing a new recordings film scores, it's can be very enjoyable if you are open to different takes on music.
some folks are just way to anal to do so.
That's sad.
Ford A. Thaxton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
