Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2015 - 10:22 AM   
 By:   dragon53   (Member)

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 27

BLADE RUNNER---Harrison Ford was confirmed as returning as Rick Deckard in the sequel. Denis Villeneuve (INCENDIES, PRISONERS) is in negotiations to direct the sequel which is set several decades after the original movie.





SPECTRE---photos released of Lea Seydoux and Dave Bautista co-starring in the latest James Bond movie. Seydoux said about playing Dr. Madeleine Swann, "I don't consider myself a Bond girl. I think I'm not really the stereotyped Bond girl. I feel quite different. You can't be like, 'Oh, James.' You have to find something else. She's not a fighter, she's a doctor. She fights in another way."
Bautista said about playing villain Mr. Hinx, "When I came over to meet Sam [Mendes], I only asked two questions. I asked him if Mr. Hinx was a badass. He said, 'Yes, he's a badass.' I said, 'Well, is Mr. Hinx intelligent?' He said, 'Very.' That's what I like about Mr. Hinx. He's very well-dressed and very well-mannered. I'm not just here to fight people. He has a sense of humor. He definitely knows what a metaphor is."







THE DEEP BLUE GOOD-BY---Rosamund Pike (GONE GIRL) is in talks to co-star with Christian Bale in the 20th Century Fox movie based on the Travis McGee novel.





THE DANISH GIRL---photo released of Eddie Redmayne (THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING) starring as Danish artist Einar Wegener who had one of the first sex change operations in 1930. Alicia Vikander will play his wife, and Amber Heard also co-stars.





ALIEN---Neill Blomkamp clarified his earlier comment about his sequel, “I’m not trying to undo ALIEN 3 or ALIEN RESURRECTION…My favorites are the first two movies. I want to make a film that’s connected to ALIEN and ALIENS. That’s my goal.”

JEM AND THE HOLOGRAMS---photo released from the Universal Pictures movie that stars Aubrey Peeples, Stefanie Kimber, Aurora Perrineau and Hayley Kiyoko. Jon M. Chu is the director.





MINORITY REPORT---the Fox sequel pilot to the Tom Cruise movie will have Stark Sands (INSIDE LLEWYN DAVIS) playing the dual role of precog twins Arthur and Dash. Meagan Good (ANCHORMAN 2: THE LEGEND CONTINUES) will play a police detective with a troubled past.

SUPERGIRL---new cast additions for the CBS pilot are David Harewood (HOMELAND) who will play Hank Henshaw, head of the Department of Extra-Normal Operations and Chyler Leigh (GREY'S ANATOMY) who will play Alex Danvers.

DC COMICS---a new spinoff series from ARROW and THE FLASH is being developed at the CW which will star Brandon Routh, Caity Lotz, Victor Garber and Wentworth Miller. Speculation is the spinoff is based on THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD.

THE CROW---Jack Huston (BOARDWALK EMPIRE) is in talks to replace Luke Evans in the reboot movie.

RED SONJA---Christopher Cosmos will write the script for the long-gestating reboot movie.

THE CORRESPONDENCE---Jeremy Irons and Olga Kurylenko star in this movie in which a professor falls in love with a younger member of his field.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2015 - 2:39 PM   
 By:   Mike_J   (Member)

Hmmmm.... trying to decide which movie I'm less excited by, the Blade Runner sequel or Spectre. To be honest, it's a tough call given that I'm anticipating both movies about as much as ai am my next visit to the dentist.

One is a sequel to a movie I have always found dull as hell and absurdly over-rated, starring an actor who is well past his sell by date, the other stars an actor who has less charisma than a big poo I flushed away this morning.

Think I'll look forward to Ant-Man and Avengers instead.

 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2015 - 2:45 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

JEM AND THE HOLOGRAMS---photo released from the Universal Pictures movie that stars Aubrey Peeples, Stefanie Kimber, Aurora Perrineau and Hayley Kiyoko. Jon M. Chu is the director.

I don't know who Stefanie Kimber is but one of the band members is played by actress Stefanie Scott.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2015 - 4:05 PM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

BLADE RUNNER---Harrison Ford was confirmed as returning as Rick Deckard in the sequel. Denis Villeneuve (INCENDIES, PRISONERS) is in negotiations to direct the sequel which is set several decades after the original movie.

It's an excellent director choice!

ALIEN---Neill Blomkamp clarified his earlier comment about his sequel, “I’m not trying to undo ALIEN 3 or ALIEN RESURRECTION…My favorites are the first two movies. I want to make a film that’s connected to ALIEN and ALIENS. That’s my goal.”

That doesn't clarify anything. It just confirms that he's ignoring the storylines of ALIEN 3 and 4.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2015 - 6:09 PM   
 By:   Cooper   (Member)


It's an excellent director choice!



...And would seem to indicate Ridley Scott's decided to stay aboard Prometheus 2.



That doesn't clarify anything. It just confirms that he's ignoring the storylines of ALIEN 3 and 4.



If Blokamp wants to utilize Ripley, his choices are awkwardly shoehorning some action in after AlienS, working with the Ripley mutant/clone 200 years later (after 'Resurrection')--for a whopping 257 year jump from ALIEN!--or asking the audience to forget about the latter two films entirely. What a mess! Remember when the story and characters of ALIEN seemed so grounded, so real? Prometheus had the latitude of re-setting the table, but the new ALIEN will be a state of the art exercise in applying timeline--and cloning!--stress to a narrative.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 27, 2015 - 7:37 PM   
 By:   Thgil   (Member)

I'd honestly say Aliens reset the table on realistic characters. Hudson, man. Hudson.

With regard to the timeline, I guess Blomkamp's Alien will be in a parallel universe.

 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 1:48 AM   
 By:   CindyLover   (Member)

Hmmmm.... trying to decide which movie I'm less excited by, the Blade Runner sequel or Spectre.


Personally, I'd take Jem And The Holograms over either of them.

Here's hoping Christian Bale has more luck with Travis McGee than Rod Taylor and Sam Elliott did.

 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 2:13 AM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

ALIEN---Neill Blomkamp clarified his earlier comment about his sequel, “I’m not trying to undo ALIEN 3 or ALIEN RESURRECTION…My favorites are the first two movies. I want to make a film that’s connected to ALIEN and ALIENS. That’s my goal.”

That doesn't clarify anything. It just confirms that he's ignoring the storylines of ALIEN 3 and 4.


He's said nothing of the sort.

The original interview quote doesn't even mention Alien 3 or 4, it's only the buzzfeed "logic of omission" that creates the concept.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 3:37 AM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

If Blokamp wants to utilize Ripley, his choices are awkwardly shoehorning some action in after AlienS, working with the Ripley mutant/clone 200 years later (after 'Resurrection')--for a whopping 257 year jump from ALIEN!--or asking the audience to forget about the latter two films entirely. What a mess! Remember when the story and characters of ALIEN seemed so grounded, so real? Prometheus had the latitude of re-setting the table, but the new ALIEN will be a state of the art exercise in applying timeline--and cloning!--stress to a narrative.

I would have preferred it if he contined the storyline after ALIEN: RESSURECTION, where we encounter Ripley (or "Ripley-clone") some 20 years after they arrive on Earth at the end of that film. At that point, they could be on Earth or back in space again. Lots of possibilities, and it would have made everything neat and tidy for a continuity junkie like myself.

However, I'm now starting to prepare myself for having a schizophrenic relationship to the timeline. There's the official timeline, which is what exists, and an alternative experiment-type timeline that can hopefully also be enjoyed for what it is. In either case, I can't wait to return to the universe again.

 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 6:41 AM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

Considering Alien 4 is two centuries ahead - why not make the film between the Alien 3 and 4 stories and just have it be a "normal" clone instead of the hybrid?

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 6:59 AM   
 By:   Francis   (Member)

I don't subscribe to the notion that an Alien movie needs Sigourney Weaver. Noomi Rapace is an equally strong actress and the story I want to see continued is that of her character and not Ripley's, who if they continue Aliens in all fairness was over. She made it to the ship, if they are to disregard Alien³, Ripley and Hicks live on happily ever after and go eat icecream with Newt in the park. Why be so cruel to involve these people in another alien nightmare? That would be like sending Sam Neill back to Jurassic Park for the gazillionth time. smile

The character of Ripley that did get the misfortune of having an alien on board had a great send off in Alien³, powerful finale. Cloned Ripley wasn't the heroine that fans cheered on and the events of Resurrection are certainly not worth revisiting IMO.

I don't get the love for Hicks. His character was expendable. That they killed him and Newt in Alien³ was not the end of the world for me and the link with Aliens was strong enough by having Lance Henriksen play a significant role in the movie.

If an Aliens sequel is what we'll get, dismissing Ripley's outcome, it will be as relevant to me as those AvP movies.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 7:07 AM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

Considering Alien 4 is two centuries ahead - why not make the film between the Alien 3 and 4 stories and just have it be a "normal" clone instead of the hybrid?

A possibility, absolutely, although it would be hard to imagine why any company would want to clone just Ripley without the 'extra benefit' of the alien.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 7:10 AM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

I don't subscribe to the notion that an Alien movie needs Sigourney Weaver. Noomi Rapace is an equally strong actress and the story I want to see continued is that of her character and not Ripley's, who if they continue Aliens in all fairness was over. She made it to the ship, if they are to disregard Alien³, Ripley and Hicks live on happily ever after and go eat icecream with Newt in the park. Why be so cruel to involve these people in another alien nightmare? That would be like sending Sam Neill back to Jurassic Park for the gazillionth time. smile

The character of Ripley that did get the misfortune of having an alien on board had a great send off in Alien³, powerful finale. Cloned Ripley wasn't the heroine that fans cheered on and the events of Resurrection are certainly not worth revisiting IMO.

I don't get the love for Hicks. His character was expendable. That they killed him and Newt in Alien³ was not the end of the world for me and the link with Aliens was strong enough by having Lance Henriksen play a significant role in the movie.

If an Aliens sequel is what we'll get, dismissing Ripley's outcome, it will be as relevant to me as those AvP movies.


Well, the AvP movies (at least the first one) are at the very least possible to integrate with the existing timeline if you nudge a bit here and there.

I agree with you re: Rapace. She's a great 'fresh start' in the franchise (without losing continuity), and I think she will continue adding her stamp to the PROMETHEUS films. But there's a part of me that actually wants to see the end of the existing Ripley timeline. Lots of great potential at the end of RESSURECTION.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 9:34 AM   
 By:   Thgil   (Member)

A huge problem I have with Resurrection is that Ripley isn't Ripley. She's a bastardized clone, used to shoehorn Weaver in to perpetuate the series.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 10:05 AM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

A huge problem I have with Resurrection is that Ripley isn't Ripley. She's a bastardized clone, used to shoehorn Weaver in to perpetuate the series.

That's rather on the cynical side, IMO.

It's true that she isn't Ripley, but I think that is its strength -- the mix of the alien and Ripley. She has a personality of her own (and of course, one does not clone personalities in the first place, only bodies).

 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 10:49 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Aliens, Shmelliens. I can't wait for Jem!

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 2:39 PM   
 By:   Hurdy Gurdy   (Member)

Holy Moly!
I didn't know Jessica Chastain was playing Eddie Redmayne in a biopic about him. wink

 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 6:20 PM   
 By:   Viscount Bark   (Member)


SPECTRE---photos released of Lea Seydoux and Dave Bautista co-starring in the latest James Bond movie. Seydoux said about playing Dr. Madeleine Swann, "I don't consider myself a Bond girl. I think I'm not really the stereotyped Bond girl. I feel quite different. You can't be like, 'Oh, James.' You have to find something else. She's not a fighter, she's a doctor. She fights in another way."


I guess it's de rigeur for a new Bond girl to state that she's the one who will be different from the ditzy Bond girls who came before her. She will finally be THE real-woman Bond girl at last! I've been hearing this line since I was a kid when they were saying Lois Chiles in MOONRAKER was the first intelligent & womanly Bond girl. And so was Carole Bouquet in FOR YOUR EYES ONLY. And Carey Lowell was finally going to put an end to that bimbo Bond girl stereotype. She was a bad-ass! And so was Michelle Yeoh. And Halle Berry. And with the new Daniel Craig era, Eva Green was not going to do any of that "Oh, James" nonsense, no sir! And now thank God for Lea Seydoux. The dumb Bond girl stereotype is finally dead! Ya-hoo!!! Truth is, there have been all sorts of Bond girls from the begining: bimbos, smart ones, sensitive ones, bad-ass ones, femme fatales, sacrificial lambs, etc. But I guess we'll always get the "Finally! A Bond girl truly worthy of Bond" line with every new movie. big grin

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 6:34 PM   
 By:   Thgil   (Member)

A huge problem I have with Resurrection is that Ripley isn't Ripley. She's a bastardized clone, used to shoehorn Weaver in to perpetuate the series.

That's rather on the cynical side, IMO.

It's true that she isn't Ripley, but I think that is its strength -- the mix of the alien and Ripley. She has a personality of her own (and of course, one does not clone personalities in the first place, only bodies).


That doesn't make it a good thing. She was dead. End of story. Then they cloned her for another sequel. Whedon didn't have her in his initial story, but Fox demanded it. My tone may seem cynical, but that's what happened.

At least they didn't have her go toe-to-toe with an alien as in the original script. That would have been a total joke.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 28, 2015 - 8:02 PM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

IÆM GONNA gie a more sensible answer tomorrow. now i'm too dunrk.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.