 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any discernable differnces? Which is the better album?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you joking? The Intrada is a re-recording and how good is open to interpretation - I for one cannot get past the out of tune french horn at the beginning.
The FSM is from the film - the original tracks in pristine sound - a great recording and I don't think it's much of a decision as to which you would want, although I never cease to be amazed at what people want 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Jul 21, 2014 - 10:26 PM
|
|
|
|
By: |
Brad Wills
(Member)
|
And I certainly enjoy sharing this fun fact with all of you fans: Goldsmith wrote a particularly interesting clarinet line for a couple of cues but had to drop the parts during his actual film recording sessions. He always stated he regretted having done this. For our re-recording, he was actually excited about finally recording the clarinet parts as written. In my opinion it makes sense to enjoy both his 1977 and 1986 performances!
--Doug
He put his clarinet line back in, but then took out the bongos from IS TEN TOO OLD. The gong, too, maybe. There are many subtle - but to me, significant changes - that totally change the flavor of the score. To me, the re-recording is indicative of an era where Goldsmith was shying away from intense and varied emotional interpretation and conducting, and started leaning toward a softer, smoother, more introspective reading. The punch and fire of the original speak more to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the Intrada actually. The English horn is out of tune on the first track but I can live with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
