Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Jan 15, 2018 - 1:36 PM   
 By:   Rick15   (Member)

What I find most amusing are the otherwise eloquent and intelligent FSMers' verbose TLJ analyses which fail to note the blatant social agenda now attached to this once-great film franchise. I could--almost--forgive the forcing of that agenda down our throats if only those beloved characters were not sacrificed to said agenda.

Wha...???? There is a social agenda now?

Does it involve Chewbacca almost eating a roasted CGI creature in front of its offspring in the name of comedy??

 
 Posted:   Jan 15, 2018 - 4:30 PM   
 By:   Sean Nethery   (Member)

What I find most amusing are the otherwise eloquent and intelligent FSMers' verbose TLJ analyses which fail to note the blatant social agenda now attached to this once-great film franchise.

P'raps not everyone agrees with the premise, and so nothing to say about it.

[Call this post "verbose" - I dare you! smile]

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 16, 2018 - 5:06 AM   
 By:   Expat@22   (Member)

What I find most amusing are the otherwise eloquent and intelligent FSMers' verbose TLJ analyses which fail to note the blatant social agenda now attached to this once-great film franchise. I could--almost--forgive the forcing of that agenda down our throats if only those beloved characters were not sacrificed to said agenda.

Well, I had a bit of a time trying to marry 'eloquent' with 'verbose'. But I suppose I mustn't rule anything out. Suffice to say that I prefer the use of plenty of words to explain someones reasoning rather than too few words so that misunderstanding arises or you can't discuss or respond because there is nothing to get your teeth into. smile

I said somewhere that the SJW angle was new to me. I remember I was shell-shocked by what I perceived TLJ be - an incoherent mess. Personally, I agree that there was a blatant SJW agenda inserted into the film at the expense of the narrative.

 
 Posted:   Jan 16, 2018 - 5:14 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

I also referred to those verbose analyses as being eloquent and intelligent. smile

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2018 - 10:37 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Has anyone asked the director WTH was the "Jesus Leia" moment all about? What exactly happened? What was the point? Was it a set up for something yet to come?

 
 Posted:   Jan 27, 2018 - 2:21 PM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

Do any longtime FSMer Star Wars fans love the Rose character? What about Admiral Gender Studies? (I've already forgotten her name)

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2018 - 12:34 AM   
 By:   Rick15   (Member)

Do any longtime FSMer Star Wars fans love the Rose character? What about Admiral Gender Studies? (I've already forgotten her name)

OK Mr Phelps. I'll bite....

Like many, I grew up on the Original Trilogy and while I loved them all as a kid, I started to realise that ROTJ did not hold up well over time.

The prequels left me cold. Can't stand them.

Then JJ came and gave us The Force Awakens. Which I loved on first viewing. On repeat viewing my opinion of it has soured because for all its spectacle....it never really gave us anything new. It did leave us with questions about new characters and what happened inbetween ROTJ and TFA which I was looking forward to exploring in the The Last Jedi. Sadly, that didn't eventuate.

Didn't like Rogue One because I didn't give a shit about any of the characters. (A major flaw that I find with many high budget films these days)

I only give that background to acknowledge that while I grew up loving Star Wars...for the most, I've been disappointed with what it has delivered since.

So. The Last Jedi. I'm not going to go into great detail as to why I found the film a great disappointment but I will answer your question about the new characters.

Rose. Couldn't give a shit. She could have been a CGI character called Dexter Jettster for all I cared. She was on screen. She delivered her lines. Didn't connect with the character or her story at all. Was it the actress? The acting? The threadbare reason for her to be there? I don't know. All I know is that I didn't care and that is not a great positive in the film making 101 playbook.

Admiral what's her face. Didn't care either. Then again, I never really cared about Admiral Akbar or Niet Numb in ROTJ. They were simply characters that were there. I never understood the love for Admiral Akbar - he shouted "It's a trap". Memorable.

I don't think it's a matter of "I'm getting older and these are kids movies". I think it's more a case of not giving a shit about characters because they are placed in a movie to try and satisfy a demographic or are just not developed enough for the audience to care. And if you don't care about the characters, it's hard to invest yourself in the story.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2018 - 4:50 AM   
 By:   Hurdy Gurdy   (Member)

I think either Rick 15 has been cloned from me, or I'm a clone of his wink
Either way, saved me a lot of typing.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2018 - 10:20 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Do any longtime FSMer Star Wars fans love the Rose character? What about Admiral Gender Studies? (I've already forgotten her name)

I don't care for any of these characters. Rey, Finn, Rose, Starbuck guy, they have no personality. That's what made Star Wars TOS and Star Trek TOS so good, personality and chemistry.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2018 - 8:53 PM   
 By:   Jeyl   (Member)

Why do people think this film is trying to incorporate some feminist agenda? If it was trying to somehow showcase that women can be the center of a Star Wars story, it didn't do a good job at it. I mean, look at this list.

Paige Tico = Dead
Tallissan Lintra = Dead
Holdo = Dead
Leia = Alive, but fans now want her dead because they think that somehow honors Carrie Fisher's passing.
Rose = Could still die from her injuries if Disney believes enough fans don't like her. Even Lucas toned down Jar Jar "the key to all of this" Binks in his prequel sequels.
Rey - One more movie and done. She said it herself. And it's not like it would make a different anyways since all the dudes writing and directing Star Wars are way more infatuated with telling Kylo's story than Reys. If the best that Rian Johnson could come up with for her character is literally nothing, what staying power could she possibly have? Speaking of...

How about that ending scene with the stable boy? I can't imagine a more fitting scene that practically apologizes for implying that women could ever carry a Star Wars movie. The stable boy isn't inspired by Leia or Rey. He's inspired by Luke Freaking Skywalker. When you factor in how the whole entire galaxy ignored Leia's call for help and how Rey failed to persuade Luke to join the fight, the message of The Last Jedi is pretty clear. Women can't get anything done until the guy steps in. It's Yoda who tells Luke to join the fight and it's Luke who comes in and saves everyone. And at the end of the day, it's Luke and ONLY Luke that anyone ever talks about. You think Rey is going to amount to anything when two dead men do a better job at inspiring others?

And don't forget! We're getting Solo: A Star Wars Story in a couple of months. Disney is literally dedicating an entire movie towards a character who is very vocal in his sexist views towards women.

Feminist agenda. Pfft.

 
 Posted:   Jan 28, 2018 - 10:05 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Why do people think this film is trying to incorporate some feminist agenda? If it was trying to somehow showcase that women can be the center of a Star Wars story, it didn't do a good job at it. I mean, look at this list.

Paige Tico = Dead
Tallissan Lintra = Dead
Holdo = Dead
Leia = Alive, but fans now want her dead because they think that somehow honors Carrie Fisher's passing.
Rose = Could still die from her injuries if Disney believes enough fans don't like her. Even Lucas toned down Jar Jar "the key to all of this" Binks in his prequel sequels.
Rey - One more movie and done. She said it herself. And it's not like it would make a different anyways since all the dudes writing and directing Star Wars are way more infatuated with telling Kylo's story than Reys. If the best that Rian Johnson could come up with for her character is literally nothing, what staying power could she possibly have? Speaking of...


Feminist agenda. Pfft.


They also killed Han, Luke, and Ackbar. So I don't what the death of these characters have to do with it. It's kinda weird the one actor who sadly passed away in real life, and actually died in the film comes back to life. I mean they had an out for a very awkward situation.

The fact the female characters are terribly written is a huge part of the problem. Simply put, Star Wars and Rogue One are girl centric. There all about girl power without putting any effort into it and besting men at everything. (Rey) Kylo is right out of the "Twilight handbook" for female loving villains. And it appears young girls love these films. Even the commercials for the films and Star Wars products are geared towards the young female demographic.

I wouldn't call it a feminist agenda from Disney, more a demographic agenda from Disney. I'm sure their plan was to get girls into Star Wars the cheapest way possibly without alienating the male demographic. And the girls are better than boys "feminist agenda" was the easiest way to accomplish that.

 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2018 - 8:05 AM   
 By:   Jeyl   (Member)

They also killed Han, Luke, and Ackbar. So I don't what the death of these characters have to do with it.

Han was killed because Harrison wanted out of this gig FAST. Luke can still come back in more ways than just being a force ghost since it's now been established that they can now physically interact with the living world. Even Alec Guiness who reportedly hated these movies still came back for the sequels.

And Ackbar? Yeah. That was a big disappointment. The story needed a decorated admiral to take over from Leia while she recovers and instead of using what they have, they go for an entirely new character instead. And Holdo's introduction is an annoying one since we're only told that she's done awesome things where compared to Ackbar, we've actually seen him do important things. It's almost like Star Wars wants to go back to alien characters being nothing more than mere set decorations instead of treating them as genuine characters who can carry scenes. Just watch how many shots in ROTJ feature close up shots of Ackbar and compare that to his three total close up shots in these last two new movies.

The fact the female characters are terribly written is a huge part of the problem. Simply put, Star Wars and Rogue One are girl centric. There all about girl power without putting any effort into it and besting men at everything.[/quote]

I wouldn't go that far. The problem I find is that these female leads are the ONLY female characters in these rag tag teams. Jyn Erso is the only female character in an ensemble of six characters and her entire arc is to do what her daddy tells her to do. With her very brief interactions with Leia, Rey has no other interactions with any other female characters in this new series. All of Disney's leading females are essentially isolated.

(Rey) Kylo is right out of the "Twilight handbook" for female loving villains.[/quote]

Key difference. Did Edward ever violate Bella against her will? Kylo Ren certainly did to Rey when he captured her in TFA. So when Rey tells Luke that the man who violated her is the galaxy's 'last hope', that was the moment I knew this series didn't really care for it's leading ladies. When you look at all the news involving all the horrendous things that men have been doing to women, how does that scene not come off as bad taste? While I'm sure many will point out that the scene was probably written and shot before the Weinstein debacle exploded, I would not have been comfortable leaving it as it was.

 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2018 - 8:39 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Ford wanted to be killed off in Empire. If he didn't want to play the character anymore he didn't have to come back at all. Money speaks I guess. It was a colossal failure that Luke and Han were never reunited.


Key difference. Did Edward ever violate Bella against her will? Kylo Ren certainly did to Rey when he captured her in TFA. So when Rey tells Luke that the man who violated her is the galaxy's 'last hope', that was the moment I knew this series didn't really care for it's leading ladies. When you look at all the news involving all the horrendous things that men have been doing to women, how does that scene not come off as bad taste? While I'm sure many will point out that the scene was probably written and shot before the Weinstein debacle exploded, I would not have been comfortable leaving it as it was.

A lot of mental gymnastics there and I don't even know where to go with all of that. And what about all the horrendous things women have done to men over the ages? And again what does any of that have to do with girl centric Star Wars? You do know the franchise is run by a woman, right? All I see are ads and commercials of little girls wielding light sabers. Probably beating up their little brothers with them too.You totally left out Rey is a Mary Sue and bests every man in the films without effort.

 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2018 - 10:49 AM   
 By:   Jeyl   (Member)

You totally left out Rey is a Mary Sue and bests every man in the films without effort.

I don't believe Rey is a Mary Sue. Mary Sues are characters who are self-inserted into the narrative as a means of wishful fulfillment for the person who's writing them. A better example of a Mary Sue would b e Wesley Crusher from Star Trek TNG. Not only is he portrayed as the smartest and most amazing thing to ever exist in Star Trek, but the Mary Sue status is taken to the next level by having his name be Wesley. Why does that matter? Because his creator is none other than Gene 'Wesley' Roddenberry. Yep. He named this super over-powered character after himself. Who is self-inserting themselves as Rey? JJ Abrams? Lawrence Kasdan? Rian Johnson? I don't think so.

I don't even think Rey could be described as a creator's pet considering all the things she fails to do in the movie. And she certainly couldn't hold her own against Snoke or over-power Kylo when trying to take back Anakin's lightsaber from him.

And what about all the horrendous things women have done to men over the ages? And again what does any of that have to do with girl centric Star Wars?

If you're going to have a girl centric Star Wars, you're not doing the girl side of things any favors when they believe that men who captured and violated them are the best hope for the galaxy. Not a good message.

You do know the franchise is run by a woman, right?

The studio may be run by a woman, but everything on the creative end has been done by men. Sure, Kathleen Kennedy may ask for a film with a female lead, but that doesn't mean the men in charge of bringing that goal to life are going to do a good job at it.

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2018 - 12:54 PM   
 By:   mikecee1   (Member)

The problem with Awakens and the Last Jedi is that it marginalized all of the old characters to support roles.

You can edit out almost all of the scenes of Han, Leia, Luke, R2, and C3PO and you would still have a coherent
story. They were pretty useless.

Had Disney just started anew with only new characters they would not have alienated a decent part of the Star Wars fan base.

 
 Posted:   Jan 29, 2018 - 9:32 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

The problem with Awakens and the Last Jedi is that it marginalized all of the old characters to support roles.

You can edit out almost all of the scenes of Han, Leia, Luke, R2, and C3PO and you would still have a coherent
story. They were pretty useless.

Had Disney just started anew with only new characters they would not have alienated a decent part of the Star Wars fan base.


Right on point. Rey should've been doing more observing and learning and finally take over the reins by the third film. This would've allowed a proper send off for the classic characters, and proper character development for Rey.

 
 Posted:   Jan 30, 2018 - 5:19 PM   
 By:   Jeyl   (Member)

Rey should've been doing more observing and learning and finally take over the reins by the third film. This would've allowed a proper send off for the classic characters, and proper character development for Rey.

Proper development for Rey = Make sure she doesn't do anything for 2/3 of the trilogy.

This is one horrendously flawed way of introducing new characters. Now it's true that some actors will accept a small role in a film with the promise of having a larger role in the sequel. That stuff happens even in Star Wars (ex. Bail Organa). But that's just one movie though. If you took this idea as a pitch to actors, you're telling them to essentially not do anything for two whole movies before they're allowed to take part in the story.

Why would actors want to do that? Star Wars isn't exactly a franchise where every actor goes on to become incredibly popular as a result. Why commit to a three picture deal when you're being told that the one movie that will show off your talents as an actor will only happen years down the line?

 
 Posted:   Jan 30, 2018 - 9:08 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Rey should've been doing more observing and learning and finally take over the reins by the third film. This would've allowed a proper send off for the classic characters, and proper character development for Rey.

Proper development for Rey = Make sure she doesn't do anything for 2/3 of the trilogy.

This is one horrendously flawed way of introducing new characters. Now it's true that some actors will accept a small role in a film with the promise of having a larger role in the sequel. That stuff happens even in Star Wars (ex. Bail Organa). But that's just one movie though. If you took this idea as a pitch to actors, you're telling them to essentially not do anything for two whole movies before they're allowed to take part in the story.

Why would actors want to do that? Star Wars isn't exactly a franchise where every actor goes on to become incredibly popular as a result. Why commit to a three picture deal when you're being told that the one movie that will show off your talents as an actor will only happen years down the line?


I didn't say do nothing, I said evolve from a supporting character to a major character. And if you want to argue your point, please tell me what Rey has done in two complete films where she was the focus of the story? I'll tell you, nothing. The first 9 films were supposed to be about the original cast. Instead the Luke, Leia and Han got cameos. You think a nobody actor or actress is gonna pass on being part of a multi billion dollar franchise because the part isn't big enough?

 
 
 Posted:   Jan 31, 2018 - 6:32 AM   
 By:   Expat@22   (Member)

Why do people think this film is trying to incorporate some feminist agenda? If it was trying to somehow showcase that women can be the center of a Star Wars story, it didn't do a good job at it.

I suppose it depends on how you define 'feminine agenda' and also what meaning you derive from the death of a character in the film, as one poster pointed out.

IMO, the narrative meaning of the female characters in the film may be derived from their actions as well as the interplay between them and the male characters.

There are some excellent videos on youtube that outline the case for what they describe as a SJW focus that was inserted into the plot.

 
 Posted:   Feb 5, 2018 - 7:47 AM   
 By:   Jim Phelps   (Member)

A question for anyone who cares to answer it:

Which scenes in TFA, TLJ, and Rogue One would you rank as being "up there" with the most famous and beloved scenes in the original trilogy?

Darth Vader's intro in Rogue One? Maybe for me, yes.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.