So I like the Twilight series scores, as music, because I'm a fan of Shore, Desplat, and Burwell...but I *really* don't want images of the stupid characters from those terrible movies ruining my iTunes cover flow. Has anyone tried tackling more classy and abstract covers for each of these five movies, by chance?
So I like the Twilight series scores, as music, because I'm a fan of Shore, Desplat, and Burwell...but I *really* don't want images of the stupid characters from those terrible movies ruining my iTunes cover flow. Has anyone tried tackling more classy and abstract covers for each of these five movies, by chance?
Yavar
Well, I suppose the natural solution to that would be, once again, to return to the designs from the books... TWILIGHT ECLIPSE NEW MOON BREAKING DAWN PART I BREAKING DAWN PART II
Alternate cover for that vexing problem when splitting 2-discers.
Fantastic work as ever, rafer. Just wondering why you opted to leave the composer credit off for TGATD, and if I could twist your arm to add it in?
Also, if possible could you please do two covers for The Lonely Guy using the same art as Intrada's? , but in higher resolution? Can't understand why Intrada seems reluctant to venture beyond 600x600?
Alternate cover for that vexing problem when splitting 2-discers.
Fantastic work as ever, rafer. Just wondering why you opted to leave the composer credit off for TGATD, and if I could twist your arm to add it in?
Also, if possible could you please do two covers for The Lonely Guy using the same art as Intrada's? , but in higher resolution? Can't understand why Intrada seems reluctant to venture beyond 600x600?
I'd assumed many people like to print them out and slot them into the jewel case for their legitimately-bought CDs, to supplant what they see as suboptimal original designs. That's certainly what I've done with a few – think about all those Michael J Lewis and John Scott discs with meh covers. Note Bruce mentioned making printouts. On that basis people would want 12cm square at, let's say 300dpi, which equates to somewhere in the region of 1400 pixels along each side.
(I could only imagine people trying to pass CDRs off as real CDs if we were producing not just fronts but the rest of the booklet (at least the reverse) AND the tray inlay too...)
Can't understand, why people need something more than 600x600? It's rather enough for iTunes or any other pc/mac library.
Or you use them for something else?
(unless some people want to sell CDr as usual CD, and this is bad thing!!!)
Yeah you don't need it bigger for iTunes. But bigger is better for viewing your collection on your computer in "cover flow". If you listen to music on Apple TV thru your big screen TV you'll want as big of an image and as possible also.
