Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   May 19, 2014 - 8:28 AM   
 By:   Ron Hardcastle   (Member)

Francis: I agree with you about Killer Joe and felt that it was another excellent (and brave) recent performance by Matthew McConaughey.

Yesterday (Sunday) was a strange day for me. I had already watched Star Trek: The Motion Picture months ago from my boxed set of the Blu-rays ( Star Trek: Original Motion Picture Collection)) and decided to put on Star Trek II (The Wrath of Khan), which looked and sounded wonderful. While watching some of its special features, I was captivated by writer/director Nicholas Meyer tribute to Ricardo Montalban and wanted to hear more, so I re-watched the entire movie with Meyers' audio commentary. Then I watched Star Trek: The Search For Spock with director Leonard Nimoy's commentary, and ended with Star Trek: The Voyage Home with the commentary by Nimoy and William Shatner. All the movies looked and sounded wonderful on Blu-ray, and the audio gave my big Klipsch speakers a good workout. I never expected to watch so much of those movies yesterday, but it was a delight and this is one boxed set I'm glad I bought. Back in the mid 1970s I used to work out at the Bruce Conner gym in the Westwood/West L.A. area, and would often chat with Montalbam while we used adjoining stationary bikes, and he was very charming. In his tribute (as well as in his audio commentary)l, director Meyer makes the point that those were Montalban's real pecs and not movie magic. Incidentally, I agree with Meyer: Montalban would have made a great King Lear!

 
 Posted:   May 19, 2014 - 8:36 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Star Trek Into Darkness 3-5

I thought the first film in this reboot series was cringe worthy. One of the worst films I have ever seen. For this outing I passed on seeing the sequel in the theater. Not caring about spoilers I became aware of the Wrath of Khan elements liberally stolen for this picture. With that in mind, I was able to put aside my issues with this approach, nor was I surprised when these elements appeared in the film.

Into Darkness story is all too familiar nowadays. Ripped right from current headlines we have elements of terrorism, first strike, and a secret lawless military organization.

The plot itself was nonsensical, full of plot holes, easy outs, perfect timings, and really stretched my suspension of disbelief. As is typical today, we go from point "a" to point "b" because that is where the writers need us to go, regardless of the lack of logic involved.

All that said, this film was a great improvement over its predecessor. Into Darkness has heart, focusing on family, friendship, duty, and flawed ideology. Something missing from most blockbuster films nowadays. The chemistry between the main characters, especially Kirk, Spock and Pike were evident and the acting was quite good. There were a few times I actually felt for the characters and the situations they were in.

It also helped that they concentrated on the better characters and actors this time around. I always felt McCoy, Scotty, and Chekov came across as Saturday Night Live shticks in the first film. They are more like parodies than real people. Luckily they were more or less in the background for most of this picture, because their outing isn't much better the second time around. (Though Scotty is growing on me)

At the end of the day I would recommend this film. It is well crafted, moves along briskly, has some nice character interplay and was generally well filmed. Ignoring my issues with the script it was entertaining despite it's many flaws.

Edit: A side note, the Klingon's looked more like Ferengi! confused

 
 Posted:   May 19, 2014 - 10:46 AM   
 By:   PhiladelphiaSon   (Member)

Been watching lots of movies. This past weekend:

GODZILLA - 0/out of 10 - complete waste of time and money.

STEP UP 3D - 5/out of 10 - As pedestrian a film as you are ever likely to see, but the dancing is impressive and the use of 3D, excellent. Beautifully rendered on Blu-ray 3D.

OKLAHOMA! - 10/out of 10 for the film, 8/ out of 10 for the Blu-ray - Better than I remembered it. Perfectly cast, scored, directed film version of the Rodgers and Hammerstein hit Broadway show. The Todd-AO version on Blu-ray looks remarkable, except for one screw-up during a scene that was filmed day-for-night, and should be dusk, but is rendered on Blu-ray as broad daylight. Also, the soundtrack has been denoised, making for a less than exciting presentation, when compared to the incredible laserdisc track.

 
 Posted:   May 19, 2014 - 4:28 PM   
 By:   DeputyRiley   (Member)

Neighbors (2014) -- 9/10

This movie was HILARIOUS! Best comedy I've seen in years. Seth Rogen, Zac Efron, Dave Franco and especially the awesome Rose Byrne were all totally awesome and had me laughing my ass off. See this movie!!!

 
 Posted:   May 19, 2014 - 4:48 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

Godzilla (2014) - 9/10
When you think about franchises like Godzilla, it comes with certain expectations. Though there were many ways to approach a new Godzilla film, this film decided to take an approach that leads to something closer to reality than has ever been seen in previous movies. I don’t claim to be an expert on what it means to create a Godzilla film. I haven’t seen very many of the movies in the series. But what I do know, is that this film succeeds at creating an engrossing world.

This version of “Godzilla” avoids any attempt to modernize it to fit within the current action movie framework. It could have been an incoherent mess caused by quick cuts and editing. Thankfully, the movie is easy to follow and yet artfully executed. It felt many times as if I was watching “Jurassic Park” for the first time. The film has that classic approach that allows for the major focus of the film to occasionally be presented in the background while still keeping the focus on it.

Alexandre Desplat wrote a fantastic dark orchestral soundtrack for “Godzilla” that blends together elements of Ligeti's Requiem and Japanese instruments to create a musical palate that fits the film perfectly. Desplat's Godzilla theme has the perfect amount of majestic flair to fit the great monster while the action music matches the frantic emergency facing so many people during moments of ultimate destruction.

Though there have been many complaints about certain characters failing to capture attention as much as they should, I found all of the characters to fit well within the story as presented. Though Aaron Taylor-Johnson isn't the most capable actor for the role here, he didn't seem to me to miss the mark significantly at any time. Through the combination of long shots for the action and larger-than-life spectacle presented masterfully, “Godzilla” succeeds at bringing the classic franchise to a new generation of viewers. This is one film you will have a hard time looking away from.

 
 Posted:   May 19, 2014 - 4:52 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

In Harm's Way (1965) - 6/10
Not a bad film but problematic in parts. It feels a bit too drawn out and over-long for one. Also, some of the action sequences are not very easy to follow. A notable showdown near the end of the film was especially confusing because the ships fighting each other all looked the same. I couldn't tell who was shooting at whom at any given time.

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2014 - 1:03 AM   
 By:   Ron Hardcastle   (Member)

solium: Re: At the end of the day I would recommend this film (Star Trek: Into Darkness). It is well crafted, moves along briskly, has some nice character interplay and was generally well filmed. Ignoring my issues with the script it was entertaining despite it's many flaws.

I'm a huge Chris Pine fan and happened to enjoy his first foray as Capt Kirk and bought it on Blu-ray. But I took my time with Darkness and was glad that I did, because I didn't feel that Benedict Cumberbatch as the villain worked at all and have no desire to see the movie again, so it's the first Star Trek I've NOT bought on either DVD or Blu-ray.

As you may have noticed, I watched Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan yesterday and enjoyed the writer/director's tribute to Ricardo Montalban on the Blu-ray

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2014 - 1:05 AM   
 By:   Ron Hardcastle   (Member)

I recently received the elaborate boxed set of the entire 8 season run of Showtime's Weeds, which, a day or so after I placed the order, regretted doing so. But I watched the final (special features) disc today, and was simply delighted by the cast and crew's affectionate look back on the show, and found myself glad that I had bought it. And what an attractive set it is, with the 15 Blu-ray discs in a hard book-like holder with lots of photographs and itself inside a very sturdy electric green plastic holder. Been a long time since I've seen many of these seasons and am looking forward to watching them. (But, unfortunately, it's like pulling teeth to extract a disc from the tight pages!)

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2014 - 8:43 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

solium: Re: At the end of the day I would recommend this film (Star Trek: Into Darkness). It is well crafted, moves along briskly, has some nice character interplay and was generally well filmed. Ignoring my issues with the script it was entertaining despite it's many flaws.

I'm a huge Chris Pine fan and happened to enjoy his first foray as Capt Kirk and bought it on Blu-ray. But I took my time with Darkness and was glad that I did, because I didn't feel that Benedict Cumberbatch as the villain worked at all and have no desire to see the movie again, so it's the first Star Trek I've NOT bought on either DVD or Blu-ray.

As you may have noticed, I watched Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan yesterday and enjoyed the writer/director's tribute to Ricardo Montalban on the Blu-ray


I was fine with Cumberbatch as a generic villain. Never once did I think he successfully emulated Khan to be honest. Kinda reminds me of the commercial on television right now where they say, "Why are the Brits always the villain in American movies?" LOL

Anyway I've read quite a few people say they liked the first but not the second, and vice-versa. I liked the second with great reservations.

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2014 - 9:21 AM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

I recently received the elaborate boxed set of the entire 8 season run of Showtime's Weeds, which, a day or so after I placed the order, regretted doing so. But I watched the final (special features) disc today, and was simply delighted by the cast and crew's affectionate look back on the show, and found myself glad that I had bought it. And what an attractive set it is, with the 15 Blu-ray discs in a hard book-like holder with lots of photographs and itself inside a very sturdy electric green plastic holder. Been a long time since I've seen many of these seasons and am looking forward to watching them. (But, unfortunately, it's like pulling teeth to extract a disc from the tight pages!)

I've recently started watching Weeds on Netflix. I'm still in Season 1 but largely enjoying it. Seems my husband took a little longer to get into it but he enjoyed the last few episodes.

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2014 - 11:17 AM   
 By:   PhiladelphiaSon   (Member)

HANSEL AND GRETEL: WITCH HUNTERS 3D - 8/out of 10

Lots of fun, and excellent use of 3D, beautifully rendered on the Blu-ray.

 
 
 Posted:   May 20, 2014 - 11:23 AM   
 By:   tarasis   (Member)

Wild Hogs 3/10 a poor mans City Slickers. Ray Liotta is awful, the script meh but William H Macy is great as always. (18th)

I Spy (Owen Wilson) - dreadful, turned it off after 10 minutes. (18th)

Lethal Weapon 1 - 9/10 Still really enjoyable after all these years and not a single piece of CGI in sight. Practical stunts are superb (though you see a few obvious bits like the roof jump they aren't really handcuffed) (19th)

 
 
 Posted:   May 20, 2014 - 11:57 AM   
 By:   Timmer   (Member)

RED TAILS ( 2010 )

Based on the true exploits of the African American Tuskegee US airforce pilots in Italy during WW II, aside from some very good aerial combat sequences* there isn't much to recommend and I couldn't help thinking that George Lucas had a hand in the utterly trite, clichéd dialogue. The real life pilots and ground crews this film makes homage to deserved far better than this patronising bullshit!

File under Pearl Harbor ( 2001 )

*THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN ( 1969 ) remains the benchmark for great aerial combat sequences. The real thing beats CGI everytime.

 
 Posted:   May 21, 2014 - 9:45 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Godzilla (2014) 3-5

A film that doesn't know what it wants to be. Deadly serious or a summer action romp. Early previews and teasers suggested this Zilla would take it's inspiration from the original 50's incarnation. Later teasers suggested a lighter comic book style monster on monster smash up.

This unevenness gave us drastically different sequences which just didn't gel together. The reactor leak and tragedy in the films opening along with the Halo jump were powerful sequences which ultimately felt jarring and out of place in context to the scenes right before and afterwards. I felt like I was watching two different films. The acting was generally fine. The cinematography (Of the Halo jump) and sound design were exceptional.

Much has been said about how little we see Zilla. I didn't mind the building up of suspense. But it was increasingly frustrating when each time I thought we were going to see a battle, the scene changes. It was like someone remotely changing channels on your television while your watching the climax of a film! In the end it was too little too late. The grand final was not all that impressive. And don't get me started on this mutated over weight Rottweiler that is supposed to be Godzilla. Truly hideous in design. It's almost laughable watching him walk. Though I will say his atomic breath is a sight to see.

There are many plot holes, and not little ones.

Spoilers:

Zilla was supposed to hunt the Muto for food, not kill them for the fun of it and walk away. The Muto's were supposed to mate. But the female was already with eggs!

Finally the score was excruciating. I can't remember the last time I watched a film where the score was so out of place. A total misfire. No it wasn't droning, nor was it thematic. But it ruined many action sequences for me. The end credits were headache inducing.

I give it a 3 out of 5 for the film it could have been. Such potential lost among mediocrity.

 
 Posted:   May 21, 2014 - 11:49 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

I don't understand. What parts of the film made it hard to take serious? It seemed to me to flow nicely together. It seems to me that a lot of people are too quick to find some small thing that makes them unable to take a movie seriously.

 
 Posted:   May 22, 2014 - 12:30 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

I don't understand. What parts of the film made it hard to take serious? It seemed to me to flow nicely together. It seems to me that a lot of people are too quick to find some small thing that makes them unable to take a movie seriously.

The navy riding the tail of a giant monster like its a dolphin. The fabricated nonexistent ancient ecosystem they created. Godzilla acting like a superhero instead of a wild animal on a hunt, as set up in the script.

Where was the sense of dread? The cute girl in Hawaii and her parents survive. The dog appeared to survive. Instead we got Avengers like action sequences, buildings falling everywhere, but no real carnage. No sense of an unstoppable force.

They should have made a choice of either doing a 50's Zilla movie or a 90's Zilla movie. This one seemed almost as cartoonish as the 98 version.

 
 Posted:   May 22, 2014 - 12:39 AM   
 By:   Ron Hardcastle   (Member)

Sirusjr: Re your I've recently started watching Weeds on Netflix. I'm still in Season 1 but largely enjoying it. Seems my husband took a little longer to get into it but he enjoyed the last few episodes.

Oh, it gets better and better! Some of the later seasons are simply outrageous! What a hoot! I hope you stick with it! I had the the first of the 15 Blu-ray discs for the entire series sticking out of its tight page, not wanting to put it back in if I was going to have to force it out again, but finally put it away, and hope to start watching it again from the beginning very soon.

Earlier today I watched I, Frankenstein starring Aaron Eckhart and Miranda Otto, which I liked a lot, though I didn't love it. Interesting premise and fascinating execution. It's not perfect, but I still recommend it. Always reliable Bill Nighy was the cold and evil one, and it was good to see the lovely Yvonne Strahovsky, who some of you may remember as the killer love interest of Dexter Morgan in the final 2 seasons of that Showtime series that will still be around long after we are all gone!

 
 Posted:   May 22, 2014 - 6:29 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

I don't understand. What parts of the film made it hard to take serious? It seemed to me to flow nicely together. It seems to me that a lot of people are too quick to find some small thing that makes them unable to take a movie seriously.

The navy riding the tail of a giant monster like its a dolphin. The fabricated nonexistent ancient ecosystem they created. Godzilla acting like a superhero instead of a wild animal on a hunt, as set up in the script.

Where was the sense of dread? The cute girl in Hawaii and her parents survive. The dog appeared to survive. Instead we got Avengers like action sequences, buildings falling everywhere, but no real carnage. No sense of an unstoppable force.

They should have made a choice of either doing a 50's Zilla movie or a 90's Zilla movie. This one seemed almost as cartoonish as the 98 version.


I don't know, I thought it had a pretty constant sense of dread. The whole ancient ecosystem was pretty interesting to me. Do characters really need to die in order for the threat to seem real? What the hell do you expect? I don't even want to consider what you would require for this to seem realistic. It is Godzilla for crying out loud!

 
 Posted:   May 22, 2014 - 6:58 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

What the hell do you expect? I don't even want to consider what you would require for this to seem realistic. It is Godzilla for crying out loud!

Very easy. Watch Godzilla 1954.

 
 Posted:   May 22, 2014 - 8:02 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

What the hell do you expect? I don't even want to consider what you would require for this to seem realistic. It is Godzilla for crying out loud!

Very easy. Watch Godzilla 1954.


yeah and I would laugh at the guy in a suit. Just like watching the original King Kong these days.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.