Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
This is a comments thread about Blog Post: Film Music Is Dead by Kjell Neckebroeck
 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 10:13 AM   
 By:   ArjanOudekerk   (Member)

Double post.

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 10:51 AM   
 By:   DavidCoscina   (Member)

Well, I've listened to Evil Dead twice in a row now and I'm sure of one thing: modern film music isn't for me.

Evil Dead. The Roque Banos one? Well, that's actually a contemporary example of a sound, well-made "traditional" score by one of the best of today's film score practicioners in recent memory.


That's the insidious irony of it. It IS well crafted. Everything David Coscina said about it was true. It's melodic and compositionally rock solid. Baños IS a gifted composer and I can recognize that intellectually. Emotionally, I just couldn't connect with his score. I just... couldn't.


At least you tried. the piano theme reminds me of vintage JN Howard (a hero of Banos supposedly) and I really like how he shapes the score over all. There are maybe 5 minutes of stuff that raises my eye brow saying "did he use Project Sam's Symphobia for that technique?" but aside from that, well done stuff.

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 11:06 AM   
 By:   Tom Servo   (Member)

I don't find this discussion any different than older fans of rock music not connecting to current bands. It's still the same genre and is influenced by earlier rock music, but I have heard people in my generation state that they can't connect emotionally to new rock bands. They can objectively appreciate it but what affects them most still are the bands, albums and songs from their youth. Why would film music fans be exempt from this same situation?

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 11:10 AM   
 By:   OnlyGoodMusic   (Member)

I don't find this discussion any different than older fans of rock music not connecting to current bands.

Of course YOU don't.

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 11:11 AM   
 By:   Vincent Bernard   (Member)

Well, I've listened to Evil Dead twice in a row now and I'm sure of one thing: modern film music isn't for me.

Evil Dead. The Roque Banos one? Well, that's actually a contemporary example of a sound, well-made "traditional" score by one of the best of today's film score practicioners in recent memory.


That's the insidious irony of it. It IS well crafted. Everything David Coscina said about it was true. It's melodic and compositionally rock solid. Baños IS a gifted composer and I can recognize that intellectually. Emotionally, I just couldn't connect with his score. I just... couldn't.


At least you tried. the piano theme reminds me of vintage JN Howard (a hero of Banos supposedly) and I really like how he shapes the score over all. There are maybe 5 minutes of stuff that raises my eye brow saying "did he use Project Sam's Symphobia for that technique?" but aside from that, well done stuff.


I know. Those "Project Sam" moments are the parts that are most off-putting to me. I LIKED the four-note piano motif and the air-raid siren—reminded me of vintage Goldsmith—the best it's just the whole of it didn't click despite his technique and structure.

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 11:18 AM   
 By:   Vincent Bernard   (Member)

I don't find this discussion any different than older fans of rock music not connecting to current bands. It's still the same genre and is influenced by earlier rock music, but I have heard people in my generation state that they can't connect emotionally to new rock bands. They can objectively appreciate it but what affects them most still are the bands, albums and songs from their youth. Why would film music fans be exempt from this same situation?

It's funny, I don't have that problem. My daughter is 21 years old now and all through her adolescence we swapped music back and forth. I'd introduce her to Led Zep, Pink Floyd and The Rolling Stones and she'd give me Avenged Sevenfold, My Chemical Romance and Lacuna Coil! We both like each other's taste in rock. Except The Beatles. She can't connect with The Beatles!

Hmmmm… come to think of it, maybe this type of problem runs in the family!

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 11:48 AM   
 By:   Tom Servo   (Member)

I don't find this discussion any different than older fans of rock music not connecting to current bands.

Of course YOU don't.


Well, seriously, why is it any different than how other genres of music change over time? And how fans of those genres, whether rock, classical or Broadway, might lament the passing of an earlier style or sound?

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 12:57 PM   
 By:   Doctor Shatterhand   (Member)

I have to laugh when you wrote that you are old because you came into film music with Back to the Future. Love for music scores is subjective and comparing the 80s to the 90s and to present day is similar to apples and oranges. They're different but they both taste great.

I was born in 1960 and I find the silver age of film music to be the best overall, but that's just me. My parents would say their music is better and my children will say the music they hear today is better. The debate continues and no one age group will win over another.

As for the 80s, I personally feel that film music from this decade began to decline from the silver age in and around 1985, the same year when BTTF came out. Not that BTTF is a bad score, ...it isn't. However, the way scores were being produced for films was beginning to go the way of "cheap". More films were adding rock bands, new age bands or whatever bands to the soundtrack over the usual thematic score the older generation of composers were use to doing. Composers such as John Barry were being pushed to the sidelines while hard rock scores polluted the theater's sound system. Younger composers were using synthesizers over the traditional orchestra because films were costing far more with actors taking huge paychecks. The list is endless to the way film music declined during this period.

However, I'm not completely upset with some music scores of late. Michael Giacchino is brilliant in his work on The Incredibles and Up, as well as Brian Tyler on Iron Man 3 and Thor 2. And despite the negativity Hans Zimmer gets at this website, he came up with a catchy theme for Sherlock Holmes which I though was very good as well as The Lone Ranger. So, as time goes on, I'm sure we will again have a period of wonderful film scores from gifted talent waiting in the wings.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 1:33 PM   
 By:   desplatfan1   (Member)

This is why I barely come to this forum. You people talk of the same thing every two minutes. I've lost the count of how many times this stuff was posted. You put all the scores around in the same bag, proving how narrow minded you people are. The less you do is actually enjoy a score, or at least appreciate their work in a film.

Film music isn't dead, it's never going to die. Because it's expanding, from a piano solo into a orchestra, to the use of different sounds (three of 2013's scores had the unusual use of skulls as percussion, buzzing insects, and computer noises), and genres.

If you keep expecting that everything will reverse into having a full orchestra playing every 5 seconds with no variations on style, themes, or genres, keep dreaming.

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 1:46 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)


Don't drink the Kool-Aid! A lot of modern music is ineffective. Some here praised William's "The Book Thief". The score brought nothing to their scenes, and he knows how to write effective music.
Think of all the lovely music in E.T. or Jurassic Park. I'm not talking about the action music, but the underscore that spoke about the characters feelings. "The Book Thief" soundtrack lacked that kind of emotional pull.


It is all a matter of what touches someone emotionally. For you the themes in The Book Thief don't have the emotional pull. For me, both The Book Thief and War Horse had gorgeous themes that really touched me.

One can go on and on about scores they found interesting but in the end it comes down to personal connection. Sometimes that personal connection doesn't come until you watch the film. Other times it never comes. A theme is only as good as the emotions it brings out in a person.

There are just as many classic scores from all eras that I just don't get into for whatever reason. It doesn't mean the scores are bad necessarily, just that they aren't for me. Though sometimes when a score is both musically lacking and emotionally lacking it becomes easier to call that score bad (Man of Steel, Inception).

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 1:56 PM   
 By:   PFK   (Member)

This is why I barely come to this forum. You people talk of the same thing every two minutes. I've lost the count of how many times this stuff was posted. You put all the scores around in the same bag, proving how narrow minded you people are. The less you do is actually enjoy a score, or at least appreciate their work in a film.

Film music isn't dead, it's never going to die. Because it's expanding, from a piano solo into a orchestra, to the use of different sounds (three of 2013's scores had the unusual use of skulls as percussion, buzzing insects, and computer noises), and genres.

If you keep expecting that everything will reverse into having a full orchestra playing every 5 seconds with no variations on style, themes, or genres, keep dreaming.




"use of skulls as percussion, buzzing insects and computer noises"


Now you know why I pretty much stay with films scores from 1930 to 1970! smile

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 2:06 PM   
 By:   Erik Woods   (Member)

This is why I barely come to this forum.

And we are better for it thank you.

You people talk of the same thing every two minutes. I've lost the count of how many times this stuff was posted.

I've lost count of the number of scores you are bootlegging and sharing on film music blogs, YouTube and such. How did everything go with Quartet Records and La La Land Records, Yonathan? Sharing any more of their scores lately?

http://www.youtube.com/user/yonythemoony1/videos

You put all the scores around in the same bag, proving how narrow minded you people are.

You are pissing off the wrong people, Yonathan.

-Erik-

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 2:14 PM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

I stuck that guy on block after reading two of his posts, Erik. You'll get less agita if you do the same.

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 2:22 PM   
 By:   Erik Woods   (Member)

I stuck that guy on block after reading two of his posts, Erik. You'll get less agita if you do the same.

Probably a good idea but someone has to let the rest of the group know that this guy is poison!

-Erik-

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 2:42 PM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)

You put all the scores around in the same bag, proving how narrow minded you people are.

Damn, my douche meter f**king exploded. Again!

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 2:53 PM   
 By:   GoodMusician86   (Member)

I get the general feeling that not only is film music "dead" or some other descriptor, it's the film industry itself.

I remember there being a time, maybe 2-3 years ago, where I couldn't go a month without going to see a movie in the theatre. The last movie I saw, is a personal favourite that got re-released, but was "Jurassic Park in 3D."

I saw the first "Hunger Games" film and wasn't blown away by it (I never read the novel so perhaps that has a play in it but I never read the Harry Potters, LOTR, or Hobbit and I liked those).

I did miss Hobbit 1 in theatres, and I plan to see Hobbit 2 and Hunger Games 2 in theatres, but past that, I can't say many movies have come out that have interested me.

And perhaps the issue isn't necessarily film music, but perhaps film music is the symptom.

We claim music today is rather uninspired, but looking at some film scores from smaller films such as "Escape from Tomorrow" and the same composers work which replaced James Horner in "Romeo & Juliet" I have to say is VERY inspiring. I've enjoyed his scores lately.

But perhaps that's the difference today between "industry" vs "independent."

I know that most of the big names out there haven't delivered anything that has interested me in quite some time (I'm still even 75/25 on Avatar and about the same with Hobbit 1).

I mention all this because even Spielberg and Lucas have claimed the industry is dying and perhaps it is. With the economy being what it's been, I can imagine that films and such are sticking with "Safe" over "new" and this can be very strangling to an industry which lives on new ideas and inspiration.

I think we're just seeing symptoms of an "ill" system which is in need of reviving.

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 3:38 PM   
 By:   Grecchus   (Member)

I think that is more or less along the lines criss-crossing my own thoughts. There's a critical limit beyond which no amount of overload can exceed.

I can't say what the latest recording dates are for the youngest score in my collection. But it's not from this year or the one before it. And if I see a movie it's because I picked it up for next to nothing. I won't pay a penny extra for more of the same.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 3:42 PM   
 By:   dan the man   (Member)

TO TOM SERVO- You hit it on the nail it is mostly bias emotions that effect one's viewpoints on things sad but true. The people who are constantly complaining about the state of film music the past decade or so are the same people who would condemn years ago[early 70's ] when a lot of music just used songs not full scores. It fills up magazines , newspapers and creates long threads like these in which a wise man after awhile might say. what is the point. But the best way to prove our point is to have a constant thread going that will have people talk about a new soundtrack you heard if it's this decade or another. The only way to expand your limited world is to listen to as much as you can.This way many people will find plenty to enjoy and keep one's interest busy.I have already heard a few nice new scores from the unknown small gem thread. Keep it coming.

 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 4:02 PM   
 By:   DavidCoscina   (Member)

I put my iPod on shuffle through JN Howard's music yesterday. Between Unbreakable and The Village, I was just amazed and genuinely moved by the music. Especially The Village. How lyrical and lovely. Just gorgeous. I don't hear this kind of writing from him any more though Parts of his fare from 2013 harken back to it. For now, Hollywood doesn't believe these types of scores are marketable. Pity.

 
 
 Posted:   Dec 12, 2013 - 4:10 PM   
 By:   joan hue   (Member)

Maybe the title of this "opinion essay" was a bit too radical, but I really admire Kjell's essay. At the end he acknowledges that there are still good current film scores. (He mentions Shore and Koreniowski as examples.) He just feels that currently good scores are "too few and far between."

Some of you agree with him and some don't. It certainly generated discussion.

What I admire about this essay are his examples of "tunes" and "dramatist." I've never seen nor heard Goldsmith's Under Fire. I loved his analysis, and now I want to track down that movie to match up the visuals with the score. Kjell's examples may be subjective, but he provides us with details and examples from several scores to support his opinion. Bravo!! He didn't say he listened to one Golden CD and decided all old scores sucked. Nor did he say he listened to one current score and decided all current scores were reprehensible. He provides some details and examples to support his personal opinion. Nice lesson for ALL of us to learn.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.